Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:55:33.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confidence limits of expected monthly rainfall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. L. Manning
H. L. Manning
Affiliation:
Empire Cotton Growing Corporation, Uganda
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Precise confidence limits of expected monthly rainfall must be regarded as fundamental to the specification of the climatic regions of an agricultural region. The science of weather forecasting is necessarily based on extensive statistics of past experience. However, unless account is taken of such factors as skewness, the means and standard deviations calculated from such statistics will lack the necessary precision and may often be misleading.

This paper shows that frequency distributions of monthly rainfall, which were demonstrably skew, may be suitably transformed so that on the new scale they approximate closely to theoretical normal distributions. As a result precise fiducial or confidence limits—shown in fact to fit the data satisfactorily—may be estimated and afterwards reconverted to the original units.

Practical applications of these confidence limits include the more accurate representation of rainfall patterns, valuable guides to the vital question of optimum time of planting, and finally, better estimates of the range of mean monthly rainfall where data are available only from a limited number of years.

Application of these limits to some special cases is discussed in some detail.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 40 , Issue 1-2 , January 1950 , pp. 169 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bartlett, M. S. (1936). J. R. Statist. Soc. Suppl, 3, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. (1938). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 6, 157–75.Google Scholar
Goulden, C. H. (1939). Methods of Statistical Analysis, p. 14. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Hendricks, W. A. (1942). U.S.D.A., Agric. Marketing Service, WPA-OP 765–97–3–16.Google Scholar
Kenney, J. F. (1943). Mathematics of Statistics, Pt. 1, p. 104. New York: D. Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Kenney, J. F. (1943). Mathematics of Statistics, Pt. 2, p. 60. New York: D. Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Kleczkowski, A. (1949). Ann. Appl. Biol. 36, 139–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, H. L. (1949). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 17, 245.Google Scholar
Mills, F. C. (1938). Statistical Methods, p. 129. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar