Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:59:57.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The composition and nutritive value of sugar beet pulp

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. E. Woodman  and
W. E. Calton
H. E. Woodman
Affiliation:
(The Institute for the Study of Animal Nutrition, School of Agriculture, Cambridge University.)
W. E. Calton
Affiliation:
(The Institute for the Study of Animal Nutrition, School of Agriculture, Cambridge University.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The object of the investigation which has been described in the present communication has been to secure information concerning the feeding value of sugar beet pulp as produced at the present time in this country. Data have been obtained respecting:

(1) The composition and digestibility of wet sugar beet pulp.

(2) The composition of dried sugar beet pulp and the digestibility of this feeding stuff when fed to ruminants (a) in the dry condition, and (b) after preliminary soaking in water.

(3) The composition of molasses-sugar beet pulp.

Data have been given showing the amounts of sugar beet by-products which are becoming available for use on the farm.

The commercial processes of drying wet sugar beet pulp, and the method of manufacture of molasses-sugar beet pulp, have been described.

It has been shown that crude fibre (20.3 per cent.) and N-free extractives (65.7 per cent.) constitute together more than four-fifths of the dry matter of sugar beet pulp, the latter being deficient in respect of protein, ash and oil. The carbohydrate of sugar beet pulp is invested with, special interest, being mainly in the form of pectose. A short account of the chemistry of the pectic substances has been given.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , July 1928 , pp. 544 - 568
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Farmer and Stockbreeder, Aug. 22, 1927.Google Scholar
(2)Farmer and Stockbreeder, Feb. 13, 1928.Google Scholar
(3)Woodman, (1922). J. Agric. Sci. 12, 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Woodman, and Stewart, (1927). J. Agric. Sci. 17, 60.Google Scholar
(5)Ehrlioh, (1917). Chem. Zentr. 41, 197.Google Scholar
(6)Fellenberg, (1918). Biochem. Z. 85, 45.Google Scholar
(7)Sohryver, and Haines, (1916). Biochem. J. 10, 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Wood, and Woodman, (1924). J. Agric. Sci. 14, 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Woodman, (1925). J. Agric. Sci. 15, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Wood, Rations for Live Stock, 1927 ed.Google Scholar
(11)Crowther, and Woodman, (1917). J. Agric. Sci. 8, 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Woodman, Blunt and Stewart, (1927). J. Agric. Sci. 17, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Kellner, . Ern. d. landw. Ntdzt. 1905 ed.Google Scholar
(14)Woodman, (1927). J. Agric. Sci. 17, 333.Google Scholar
(15)Pfeiffer, and Lehmann, (1885). J.f. Landw., p. 387.Google Scholar
(16)Woodman, and Hanley, (1926). J. Agric. Sci. 16, 24.Google Scholar
(17)Hansson, . Fütterung der Haustiere, 1926 ed.Google Scholar
(18)Wood, . “The Farmer's Sheet-Anchor,” The Nineteenth Century and After, Aug. 1927.Google Scholar
(19)Woodman, Blunt and Stewart, (1926). J. Agric. Sci. 16, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20)Woodman, Norman and BEE, (1928). J. Agric. Sci. 18, 266.Google Scholar