Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:24:53.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compensatory growth in immature sheep: III. Feed utilization by sheep subjected to feed deprivation followed by realimentation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. R. Drew  and
J. T. Reid
K. R. Drew
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14850
J. T. Reid
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14850
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Experimental conditions and design were described in Part I. When compared with continuous growth, there was a 46% increase in rate of gain following refeeding, but no increase in intake per kg0·734 (MBS) per day. Part of the reason for this was the rapid accumulation of body water after realimentation. If the total cost of feed, including that of the weight-loss phase, is used to calculate the feed required per unit of gain, however, the sheep realimented at 26 kg to reach an empty body weight (EBW) of 45 kg had a requirement 27% higher than ad libitum continuously fed sheep taken to the same final EBW.

The only treatment effect on digestibility or metabolizability of the diet that was not accounted for by level of intake was a depression immediately after underfeeding commenced. The metabolizable energy (ME) value later decreased markedly as a result of the relatively high proportion of gross energy lost in the urine (14·4%).

There were no significant differences between normal growth and refeeding in maintenance requirement or efficiency of energy retention above maintenance. The combined figures were 107 ± 14 kcal ME/kg MBS/day and 52 ± 7% respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 85 , Issue 2 , October 1975 , pp. 215 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L. (1962). TheEnergy Metabolism of Ruminants. London: Hutchinson & Co.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Graham, N. McC. (1955b). Nutritive value for sheep of dried grass prepared in different ways. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 14, xv.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wood, W. A. (1951). Nutrition of the young Ayrshire calf. British Journal Nutrition 5, 11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth. New York: Reinhold.Google Scholar
Burton, J. H. (1967). The effects of age and weight on the body composition of sheep. M.S. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Burton, J. H. (1970). The efficiency of energy utilization and changes in adipose tissue during periods of growth, weight reduction and realimentation in sheep. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Drew, K. R. & Reid, J. T. (1975). Compensatory growth in immature sheep. I. The effects of weight loss and realimentation on the whole body composition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, E. & Lipner, H. (1971). Biochemical Endocrinology of the Vertebrates. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice·Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Han, I. K. (1965). Some physiological effects of frequency of meals on sheep and rats ingesting diets of equal amounts. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Keenan, D. M., McManus, W. R. & Freer, M. (1970). Voluntary intake of food by mature shesp and following restricted feeding. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, W. R., Reid, J. T. & Donaldson, L. E. (1972). Studies of compensatory growth in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. H. & Clawson, W. J. (1964). Undernutrition and subsequent realimentation in rats and sheep. Journal of Animal Science 23, 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paladines, O. L. (1963). Energy utilization by sheep as influenced by physical form, composition and level of intake of diet. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Paladines, O. L., Reid, J. T., Van Niekerk, G. D. H. & Bensadoun, A. (1964). Relationship between the nitrogen content and the heat of combustion of urine. Journal of Animal Science 23, 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quimby, F. H. (1948). Food and water economy of the young rat during chronic starvation and recovery. Journal of Nutrition 36, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeds, P. J., Munday, K. A. & Turner, M. R. (1971). Action of insulin and growth hormone on protein synthesis in muscle from non-hypophysectomised rabbits. Biochemical Journal 125, 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehy, E. J. & Senior, B. J. (1942). Storing cattle at different levels of nutrition. Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Eire 39, 245.Google Scholar
Swift, R. W. & French, C. E. (1954). Energy Metabolism and Nutrition. Washington, D.C.: Scarecrow Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
Trenkle, A. (1972). Radioimmunoassay of plasma hormones: Review of plasma insulin in ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science 55, 1200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trenkle, A. (1974). Hormonal and nutritional interrelationships and their effects on skeletal muscle. Journal of Animal Science 38, 1142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, P. N. & Osbourn, D. F. (1960). Compensatory growth after undernutrition in mammals and birds. Biological Reviews 35, 324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wool, I. G., Stirewalt, W. S., Kurihara, K., Low, R. B., Bailey, P. & Dyer, D. (1968). Mode of action of insulin in the regulation of protein biosynthesis in muscle. Recent Progress in Hormone Research 24, 139.Google ScholarPubMed