Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:32:18.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of the vegetative growth, development and seed yield of three varieties of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

O. Ojeaga Ojehomon
Affiliation:
Federal Department of Agricultural Research, Moor Plantation, Ibadan, Nigeria

Summary

The vegetative growth, flowering and seed yield of three cowpea varieties—Adzuki, Mala and New Era—with contrasting yields, were compared in one field and two greenhouse experiments. In the field the plants were spaced so far apart that they did not form a closed stand, but were effectively individuals, like the potted plants used in the greenhouse experiments. In all experiments New Era yielded most followed by Mala, although the differences between these two varieties were not significant, and Adzuki least.

Seed yield and vegetative growth were not simply related. New Era with the highest seed yield had the largest vegetative dry weight, leaf area and leaf area duration (D), followed by Mala, with Adzuki always least in each parameter. However, the superiority of New Era in total dry weight and leaf area was much greater than in seed yield. Mala and Adzuki were more efficient than New Era in converting dry matter into seed. Large fractions of current assimilates moved from the leaves to the seed of Adzuki and Mala than of New Era.

Varietal differences in relative growth rate, net assimilation rate, or leaf area ratio were too small to account for varietal differences in seed yield.

New Era and Mala produced more flower buds than Adzuki. However, Adzuki developed the largest proportion of ripe fruits, but had more aborted seeds/fruit than New Era and Mala. Thus, increased flower production and fruit formation did not increase the production of mature seeds. Therefore, little would be gained by breeding or selecting for increased flower production. The heavier seeds of Mala and New Era compared with those of Adzuki contributed greatly to their larger yields. At the spacing of 3 ft x 1 ft used in the field, the leaf area index (L) and leaf area duration (D) were suboptimal, and closer spacing should increase yield.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ezedinma, F. O. C. (1967). Seasonal variations in the growth of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) seedlings in the humid tropical environment of Southern Nigeria. Jl W. Afr. Sci. Ass. 12, 45–9.Google Scholar
Federal Department of Agricultural Research (F.D.A.R.) (1964). Annual Report 19641965, p. 24. Federal Min. of Information, Printing Div., Lagos, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization (F.A.O.) (1966). Agricultural Development in Nigeria 19651980. 186–7.Google Scholar
Hughes, A. P. (1964). Some modifications of Schwabe's photometric apparatus for leaf measurement. Ann. Bot. 28, 473–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, A. P. & Freeman, P. R. (1967). Growth analysis using frequent small harvests. J. appl. Ecol. 4, 553–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, Y. (1965). Some relations between flower bud differentiation, flowering and fruiting in common beans. J. hort. Ass. Japan 24, 56–8.Google Scholar
Oyenuga, V. A. (1955). Nigeria's Feeding Stuff. Univ. College, Ibadan, Nigeria, Faculty of Agriculture Technical Bull. 1, 150.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. A. (1963). The field pests problem on cowpeas in Southern Nigeria. Proa. 1st Nig. drain Legume Conf., Samaru, 18.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1958). Factors limiting production. The Biological Productivity of Britain, pp.110. London: Institute of Biology.Google Scholar