Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:00:40.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of field inoculation methods with Cercosporella herpotrichoides (Fron) on spring barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Gareth Jones  and
J. M. L. Davies
D. Gareth Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Botany, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
J. M. L. Davies
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Botany, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A comparison was made of six different methods of inoculation with Cercosporella herpotrichoidesFron on field plots of the spring barley variety Impala. All inoculation treatments produced significant differences in terms of disease incidence and grain yield compared with the uninoculated controls. Significant differences were found between treatments in terms of disease incidence, disease severity, mean yield/head and 1000 grain weights. The time of inoculation was also found to be significant. The earlier inoculation caused a reduction in yield of approximately 66 % compared with 50 % at the later inoculation. The application of these methods is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , December 1969 , pp. 437 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bockman, H. (1953). Untersuehungen über die Anfälligkeit verschiedener Weizensorten gegen die Halmbruchkrankheit des Getreides. Z. PflZücht. 32, 361–72.Google Scholar
Bockman, H. (1962). Künstliehe Freilandinfektionen mit den Erregern der Fuss-und Ährenkrankheiten des Weizens I. NachrBl. dt. PflSchutzdienst, Stuttg. 14, 153–8.Google Scholar
Bruehl, G. W. & Nelson, W. L. (1964). Techniques for mass inoculations of Winter wheat in the field with Cercosporella herpotrichoides. Pl. Dis. Reptr 48, 863–5.Google Scholar
Destroux, L. (1964). Methode pratique d'inoculation du piétin-verse (Cercosporella herpotrichoides Fron). Parasitica 2, 86–8.Google Scholar
Dickens, L. E. (1964). Eyespot footrot of winter wheat caused by Cercosporella herpotrichoides. Corncll Univ. agric. Exp. Stn. Memoir 390.Google Scholar
Diercks, R. (1965). Die Bekämpfung der Halmbruchkrankheit des Getreides (Cercosporella herpotrichoides) unter besonderer Berücksichtigung chemischer Verfahren. Bayer, landw. Jb. 42. Sonderheffc 4, 135.Google Scholar
Lange-De La Camp, M. (1960). Die durch Cercosporella herpotrichoides Fron hervorgerufenen Schäden. Albrecht-Thaer-Arch. 4, 91–119.Google Scholar
Lupton, F. G. H. & Macer, R. C. F. (1955). Winter wheats resistant to eyespot. Agriculture, Lond. 62, 54–6.Google Scholar
Macer, R. C. F. (1966). Resistance to eyespot disease (Cercosporella herpotrichoides Fron) determined by a seedling test in some forms of Triticum Aegilops, Secale and Hordeum. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 67, 389–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pang, Chang E. W. & Tyler, L. J. (1964). Sporulation by Cercosporella herpotrichoides on artificial media. Phytopathology 54, 6, 729–35.Google Scholar
Ponchet, J. (1959). La maladie du piétin-verse des cereales, Cercosporella herpotrichoides Fron; importance agronomique, biologie, épiphytologie. Annls Épiphyt. Series C, 10, 45–98.Google Scholar
S'Jacob, J. C. (1966). Verslagen van literatuuronderzoek op het gebied der graanzielkten ten dienste van de veredeling. II. Oogvlekkenziekte (voetziekte) (Cercosporella herpotrichoidea Fron) van tarwe. Wageningen: Stichting Nederlands Graan-Centrum.Google Scholar