Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:37:46.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of diploid and tetraploid Lolium perenne L. sown alone and in mixtures with particular reference to the effect of treading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. H. Charles  and
J. Valentine
A. H. Charles
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth
J. Valentine
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Diploid and tetraploid perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) cultivars were compared sown alone and in mixtures, with and without cattle treading for 4 years after the year of sowing. Data were also obtained on the survival of tetraploid ryegrass in mixtures under farm conditions.

The overall effect of treading was not large but annual yield of dry matter was reduced by cattle treading every year (mean 9%). Sheep grazing and treading also reduced yield below that of cut plots. The reduction depended on the sampling date and varied from 40% to nil. In two instances treading increased yield.

Interactions between cultivars/mixtures and treading occurred in 22% of the occasions when treading influenced yield. In the first harvest year the tetraploid Reveille was more resistant to treading than the diploid S. 24. In older swards (3rd and 4th harvest year) the situation was reversed. The occurrence of cultivar/mixtures × treading interactions and the effect of mixing diploid and tetraploid ryegrass on resistance to treading were unpredictable.

The evidence from the main trial and the farm survey showed that tetraploid ryegrass could persist for at least 3 years after the seeding year when exposed to periods of high stock density. In addition, in mixtures there was no initial domination of the sward by either component when cut or when subjected to severe treading. In the third harvest year of the experiment the proportion of tetraploid ryegrass decreased considerably. Total yield of the mixtures was not significantly different from that of pure swards of the components though seasonal distribution of yield could be modified. The contribution of tetraploid ryegrass to swards up to 4 years old was in proportion to the percentage of tetraploid in the seeds mixture. Evidence from both the experiment and farm survey demonstrates that it is possible to exploit advantages claimed for tetraploids in mixtures for three harvest years without detrimental effect on sward performance.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 91 , Issue 2 , October 1978 , pp. 487 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alcock, M. B. & Morgan, E. W. (1966). The effect of frequency of defoliation on the yield of mixtures of S. 22 (diploid) and Tetra (tetraploid) Italian ryegrass in early establishment. Journal of the British, Grassland Society 21, 62–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alder, F. E. (1964). Preliminary results of a comparison between tetraploid and diploid ryegrass. Nature, London 203, 546–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon. (1971). Recommended varieties of herbage grasses. National Institute of Agricultural Botany, Farmers Leaflet, No. 16, 1971–1972.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E. & Watson, J. N. (1971). Silage and milk production. A comparison between a diploid and a tetraploid ryegrass. Journal of the British Grassland Society 26, 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, A. H. (1961). Differential survival of cultivars of Lolium, Dactylis and Phleum. Journal of the British Grassland Society 16, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, A. H. (1964). Differential survival of plant types in swards. Journal of the British Grassland Society 19, 198–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, A. H. (1966). Variation in grass and clover populations in response to agronomic selection pressures. Proceedings of the Xth International Grassland Congress, Helsinki, pp. 625–629.Google Scholar
Charles, A. H. (1972). Ryegrass populations from intensively managed leys. III. Reaction to management, nitrogen application and Poa trivialis L. in field trials. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmond, D. B. (1958). The influence of treading on pasture – a preliminary study. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 1, 319–328.Google Scholar
Edmond, D. H. (1964). Some effects of sheep treading on the growth of 10 pasture species. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 7, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, H. (1967). Ergebnisse von Versuchen mit tetraploiden Raigrasen. Mitteilungen fur die Schweizerische Landwirtschaft, Zurich 15, 51–57.Google Scholar
Harkess, R. D. (1965/1966). The effects of sheep treading. Scottish Agriculture 45, 16–18.Google Scholar
Harkess, R. D. (1966/1967). Tetraploid grasses. Scottish Agriculture 46, 31–32.Google Scholar
Harries, J. H. & Norrington-Davies, J. (1974). Competition for phosphate between a diploid and a tetraploid perennial ryegrass. Journal of the British Grassland Society 29, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrington-Davies, J. & Crowley, J. G. (1969). Effect of density and fertility on the competitive interactions of diploid and tetraploid ryegrass during early growth. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 359–374.Google Scholar
Wit, F. (1966). Polyploiden en haploiden. In Ontwikkelingen in de Plantenveredeling (ed. Lange, W., Lamberts, H. & Wit, F.), pp. 107–131. Wageningen: S.V.P.Google Scholar