Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:04:42.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison between the mode of sction of organic matter and synthetic polymers in stabilizing soil crumbs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. W. Emerson
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts

Extract

Synthetic soil crumbs stabilized by the addition of small quantities of a polymer, and natural soil crumbs from old grassland, have been extracted with neutral sodium pyrophosphate and alkali and the strengths of the crumbs compared before and after extraction, using the sodium saturation technique. Three polymers were used: polyvinyl alcohol (a non-ionic polymer), sodium alginate, and a vinyl acetate-maleic anhydride co-polymer (Vama), the latter both carboxylated polymers. Pyrophosphate was able to displace the carboxylated polymers from the synthetic crumbs, but not the stabilizing fraction of the organic matter from the grassland crumbs. 0·5N-NaOH produced a much greater reduction on the strength of the alginate treated crumbs compared with Vama crumbs, which is attributed to the weaker hydrogen bonds formed by the former. Prolonged leaching with alkali removed a considerable part of the stabilizing organic matter in the grassland crumbs. Neither method of extraction affected the stability of the polyvinyl alcohol crumbs.

It is concluded that the grassland crumbs are stabilized by the formation of inter-lamellar complexes with the clay in the crumbs, and probably that the substance forming the complexes is a polymer and contains amino-groups.

Evidence is also given that phosphate ions and the carboxylated polymers are attached in the same manner to the edges of the clay crystals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Emerson, W. W. (1954). J. Soil. Sci. 5, 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, W. W. (1955). Nature, Lond., 176, 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, W. W. (1956). J. Agric. Sci. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Emerson, W. W. (1956 a). To be published.Google Scholar
Oplatka, A. (1954). Disc. Faraday Soc. 51, 464.Google Scholar
Saric, S. P. & Schofield, R. K. (1946). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 185, 431.Google Scholar
Scheffer, F. (1954). Trans. Vth Int. Congr. Soil Sci. Belgian Congo.Google Scholar
Talibureen, O. (1955). Trans. Faraday Soc. 51, 464.Google Scholar
Toogood, J. A. & Peters, T. W. (1953). Canad. J. Agric. Soc. 23, 159.Google Scholar