Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:36:49.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative studies on the use of green manuring, organic manuring and Azolla and blue-green algal biofertilizers to rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. L. Singh ,
P. K. Singh  and
P. L. Singh
A. L. Singh
Affiliation:
Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack 753 006, Orissa, India
P. K. Singh
Affiliation:
Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack 753 006, Orissa, India
P. L. Singh
Affiliation:
Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack 753 006, Orissa, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Azolla and blue-green algae (BGA) biofertilizers in rice cultures were compared with farmyard manure (FYM), Azolla and Eichhornia compost, green manuring with Sesbania and chemical nitrogen fertilizer as urea. Growing Azolla crop in rice field once before transplanting and twice after transplanting produced a fresh biomass of Azolla of 46·7–47·6 and 36·4–40·6 t/ha, containing 83·4–92·2 and 64·7–70·4 kg N/ha, with the rice varieties IR-36 and Mahsuri, respectively. The BGA produced only 7·9–8·9 and 5·2–7·2 t fresh biomass/ha, containing 19·5–20·6 and 14·8–19·3 kg N/ha with IR-36 and Mahsuri, respectively.

In the 1st year of the experiment application of FYM, Eichhornia and Azolla compost and green manuring of Sesbania produced lower grain and straw yields and panicles than 60 kg N/ha as urea, but during the 2nd year all these treatments showed responses equal to that of 60 kg N/ha as urea. Nitrogen concentration and uptake by rice in these treatments were, however, lower than that of 60 kg N/ha as urea. Growing and incorporating Azolla once before and twice after transplanting produced higher grain and straw yields, and more panicles, and also showed higher nitrogen concentration and uptake by rice than those of organic and green manures. The BGA inoculation to rice with 30 kg N/ha as urea produced less grain and straw, and fewer panicles, and also showed lower nitrogen concentration and uptake by rice than 60 kg N/ha as urea and other organic manures. Of the two rice varieties, IR-36 produced more grain and panicles than Mahsuri, but Mahsuri produced more straw.

Total nitrogen, organic carbon and available phosphorus of soil after harvest of the rice increased owing to the application of organic manures, green manures and Azolla and BGA biofertilizers. The green manuring of Sesbania and using Azolla once before and twice after transplanting and FYM showed highest organic carbon and available phosphorus in soil after harvest.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 110 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 337 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jackson, M. L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India.Google Scholar
Rains, D. W. & Talley, S. N. (1979). Use of Azolla in North America. In Nitrogen and Rice, pp. 419–433. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Roger, P. A. & Kulasooriya, S. A. (1980). Blue-green Algae and Rice. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Singh, A. L. & Singh, P. K. (1986 a). Comparative studies on different methods of Azolla utilization in rice culture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 273–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, A. L. & Singh, P. K. (1986 b). Comparative effects of Azolla and blue-green algae in combination with chemical N fertilizer on rice crop. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences (Plant Science) 96, 147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, A. L. & Singh, P. K. (1987). The use of Azolla pinnata isolates as organic nitrogen sources for low land rice (Oryza sativa). Experimental Agriculture 23, 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, N. T. (1984). Green manures as sources of nutrients in rice production. In Organic Matter and Rice, pp. 217–228. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Singh, P. K. (1981). Use of Azolla and blue-green algae in rice cultivation in India. In Associative N2-fixation (ed. Vose, P. B. and Ruschel, A. P.), pp. 183–195. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Singh, P. K., Mishra, S. P. & Singh, A. L. (1984). Azolla biofertilization to increase rice production with emphasis on dual cropping. In Practical Application of Azolla for Rice Production (ed. Silver, W. S. and Schroder, E. C.), pp. 132–144. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff/W. Junk.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, P. K., Satapathy, K. B., Mishra, S. P., Nayak, S. K. & Patra, R. N. (1982). Application of Azolla in rice cultivation. In Proceedings of the National Symposium on Biological Nitrogen Fixation, pp. 423–450. New Delhi: Indian Agricultural Research Institute.Google Scholar
Tanaka, A. (1978). Role of organic matter. In Soils and Rice, pp. 605–620. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Watanabe, I. (1982). Azolla–Anabaena symbiosis its physiology and use in tropical agriculture. In Microbiology of Tropical Soils and Plant Productivity (ed. Dommergues, Y. R. and Diem, H. G.), pp. 169–185. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff/W. Junk.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, I. (1984). Use of green manures in North-East Asia. In Organic Matter and Rice, pp. 229–234, Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar