Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:16:24.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative semen characteristics of Corriedale, Marwari and Jaisalmeri rams maintained under hot arid conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. P. Mittal
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Studies, Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur, India
P. K. Ghosh
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Studies, Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur, India

Summary

This paper describes the comparative semen characteristics (volume, motility, sperm density, number of sperms, percentage live and abnormal sperms) of Corriedale (exotic) and Marwari and Jaisalmeri (indigenous) rams during the summer and rainy seasons under the arid conditions of Jodhpur, in northwestern India. Except for sperm density, the semen of indigenous animals was superior to that of the Corriedale, although the differences recorded were not of a magnitude to cause the Corriedale sheep to be considered reproductively ineffective under hot arid conditions, if managed properly. The present findings do not conform to the earlier views of the prevalence of ‘summer sterility’ in Corriedale rams observed under hot humid conditions but there appears to be a negative relationship between semen quality and atmospheric humidity. The Corriedale sheep are recommended for improving the sheep sector in the desert areas of Rajasthan.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amir, D. & Volcani, R. (1965a). Seasonal fluctuations in the sexual activity of Awassi, German Mutton Merino, Corriedale, Border-Leicester and Dorset Horn rams. I. Seasonal changes in semen plasma volume and its fructose and citric acid concentrations. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 64, 115120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amir, D. & Volcani, R. (1965b). Seasonal fluctuations in the sexual activity of Awassi, German Mutton Merino, Corriedale, Border-Leicester and Dorset Horn rams. II. Seasonal changes in semen characteristics. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 64, 121125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutt, R. H. & Bush, L. F. (1955). The effect of low environmental temperature on initiation of the breeding season and fertility in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 14, 885896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E., Badreldin, A. L. & Darwish, Y. H. (1955). Seasonal variations in the semen characteristics of sheep in sub-tropics. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 45, 283292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaushish, S. K. & Sahni, K. L. (1976). Effect of feeding animal protein (egg + milk) and trace elements and provision of cooler climate on libido, semen quality and certain physiological reactions of Russian Merino rams during summer season. Indian Journal of Animal Science 46, 135139.Google Scholar
Meis Filho, A. & Ramos, De Almeda (1956). Semen production of rams in Brazil. Paper III. International Congress Animal Reproduction (Cambridge), section 3, 101.Google Scholar
Sahni, K. L. & Roy, A. (1967). A note on summer sterility in Romney Marsh rams under tropical conditions. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science 37, 335338.Google Scholar
Sahni, K. L. & Roy, A. (1969). Influence of season on semen quality of rams and effects of dilutors and dilutions on in vitro preservation. Indian Journal of Animal Science 39, 114.Google Scholar
Sahni, K. L. & Roy, A. (1972a). A note on seasonal variation in semen production of Corriedale and Corriedale × Bikaneri (half bred) rams under tropical conditions. Indian Journal of Animal Science 42, 99101.Google Scholar
Sahni, K. L. & Roy, A. (1972b). A note on seasonal variation in the occurrence of abnormal spermatozoa in different breeds of sheep and goats under tropical conditions. Indian Journal of Animal Science 42, 501504.Google Scholar
Salisbury, G. W. & Van Demark, N. L. (1961). Physiology of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination of Cattle, ch. 14, pp. 326358. San Francisco and London: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Singh, B. & Roy, A. (1963). Studies on certain aspects of sheep and goat husbandry. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science 3, 128132.Google Scholar
Tiwari, S. B. & Sahni, K. L. (1975). Semen quality of Rambouillet and its crosses with native during the hotter part of the year. Indian Veterinary Journal 52, 614619.Google Scholar