Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:51:35.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The cobaltinitrite (volumetric) method of estimating potassium in soil-extracts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. Milne
Affiliation:
(University of Leeds1.)

Extract

The cobaltinitrite method, in the volumetric form here described in detail, enables known amounts of potassium to be accounted for quantitatively, independently of the presence of alkaline earth sulphates, or phosphates, provided that the amount of potassium is not varied over too great a range. The factor 0·000830 gm. K2O per c.c. N/10 KMnO4 suits the procedure described over a range of about 3 to 50 mg. K2O. Outside this range, or for highly accurate work within it, it may be desirable to calibrate the method.

The method may be applied, in plant-ash analyses, indifferently to the original extracts containing other bases and phosphates, or to the mixed sulphates weighed for sodium and potassium together. It is applicable to small-quantity work upon soils with greater exactness and speed than is the perchlorate method. Citric acid extracts can be handled, with a relatively short manipulation, to give satisfactory results.

Some analyses of ammonium chloride extracts have been unsatisfactory, and attention is called to the desirability of setting exchangeable potassium determinations upon a firmer analytical basis, by investigation of methods of freeing the extracts from ammonium salts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Drushel, Amer. J. Sci. (1907), 24, 433; and (1908), 26, 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Mitscherlich, and Fischer, Landw. Versuchs. Stat. (1912), 76, 139; and (1912), 78, 75.Google Scholar
(3)Christensen, and Feilberg, Landw. Versuchs. Stat. (1920), 97, 27.Google Scholar
(4)Morgulis, and Perley, J. Biol. Chem. (1928), 77, 647; seen in Chen. Abstracts (1928), 22, 2763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Leitch Morris, R.. Analyst (1923), 48, 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Haff, and Schwartz, . J. Ind. Eng. Chem. (1917), 9, 785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Davis, W. A.. J. Agric. Sci. (1912), 5, 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Dodd, A. H.. J. Agric. Sci. (1924), 14, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar