Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:48:42.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The chemistry of basic slags

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Ernest Vanstone
Ernest Vanstone
Affiliation:
The Seale-Hayne Agricultural College, Newton Abbot, Devon.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Two basic slags differing widely in solubility and phosphate content have been treated for long periods with boiling ammonium chloride solution.

2. The low-grade slag lost 70 per cent. of the total lime and very little phosphoric acid; a residue with nearly 40 per cent. phosphate was obtained from an 18 per cent. slag.

3. The high-soluble slag also lost a large percentage of the total lime but large amounts of phosphoric acid were also found in solution. The residue from the 30 per cent. slag after 24 hours' treatment contained nearly 46 per cent. phosphate.

4. It is shown that a silico-phosphate is present in the high-soluble slag, but not in the low-grade slag.

5. The solubility in citric acid of the phosphates in the various residues has been determined.

6. The value of basic slags in supplying exchangeable calcium is discussed.

7. The effect of hydrofluoric acid on the slag residues has been investigated.

8. Experiments with fluorspar slags are described which confirm the view that the phosphate present is fluorapatite of very low solubility in citric acid.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 1927 , pp. 143 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Williams, (1926). Journ. Agric. Sci. 16, Pt 2, 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Barnette, (1924). Soil Science, 17, 479.Google Scholar
(3)Voelcker, (1920, 1921). Journ. Roy. Agric. Soc. Eng. 274–5; 167.Google Scholar
(4)McArthur, (1923). Journ. Soc. Cliem. Ind. 42, 20, Transactions, 213.Google Scholar
(5)Stead, (1895). Journ. Iron and Steel Inst.Google Scholar
(6)Morrison, (1909). Journ. Agric. Sci. 3, Pt 2, 161.Google Scholar
(7)Vanstone, (1925). Journ. Agric. Sci. 15, Pt 4, 460.Google Scholar
(8)André, and Copaux, (1924). Bull, de la Soc. Chim. 4, 35, 1113.Google Scholar
(9)Bainbridge, (1920). Trans. Faraday Soc. 16, No. 2, 312.Google Scholar