Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:19:32.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The chemical buffer system in raw and digested animal slurry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. G. Sommer  and
S. Husted
S. G. Sommer
Affiliation:
The Danish Institute of Plant and Soil Science, Research Centre Foulum, PO Box 23, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
S. Husted
Affiliation:
The Danish Institute of Plant and Soil Science, Research Centre Foulum, PO Box 23, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Slurry pH is of great importance for the regulation of ammonia volatilization from livestock slurry, and therefore more knowledge of the buffer system controlling pH is urgently needed for modelling ammonia losses from stored and surface-applied slurry. The composition of 17 different Danish cattle, pig and biogas plant-digested slurries was studied. The results were used to describe the main buffer components in the slurries, and to discover the most important chemical components necessary for modelling slurry pH. The results showed that the pH of slurry was mainly controlled by the species NH4+/NH3, CO2/HCO3-/CO32- and CH3COOH/CH3COO-, and that ion pair formation did not change the ionic balance significantly. There were only trace amounts of Ca2+, Mg2+ and inorganic phosphates in solution due to precipitation of CaCO3 (calcite) and MgNH4PO4.6H2O (struvite). Measured electrical conductivities were found to be strongly correlated with the calculated ionic strength.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 124 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 45 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bril, J. & Salomons, W. (1990). Chemical composition of animal manure: a modelling approach. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 38, 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bristow, A. W., Whitehead, D. C. & Cockburn, J. E. (1992). Nitrogenous constituents in urine of cattle, sheep and goats. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 59, 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buijsman, E., Maas, H. F. M. & Asman, W. A. H. (1987). Anthropogenic NH3 emissions in Europe. Atmospheric Environment 21, 1009–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, P. & Cornforth, I. S. (1978). Volatile fatty acids in stored animal slurry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 29, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordham, A. W. & Schwertmann, U. (1977 a). Composition and reactions of liquid manure (güile), with particular reference to phosphate: I. Analytical composition and reaction with poorly crystalline iron oxide (ferrihydrite). Journal of Environmental Quality 6, 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordham, A. W. & Schwertmann, U. (1977 b). Composition and reactions of liquid manure (gülle), with particular reference to phosphate: II. Solid phase components. Journal of Environmental Quality 6, 136–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordham, A. W. & Schwertmann, U. (1977 c). Composition and reactions of liquid manure (gülle), with particular reference to phosphate: III. pH-buffering capacity and organic components. Journal of Environmental Quality 6, 140–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, A. E., Clesceri, L. S. & Eaton, A. D. (1992). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Edition. Washington DC: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
Griffin, R. A. & Jurinak, J. J. (1973). Estimation of activity coefficients from the electrical conductivity of natural aquatic systems and soil extracts. Soil Science 116, 26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husted, S., Jensen, L. S. & Storgaard Jørgensen, S. (1991). Reducing ammonia loss from cattle slurry by the use of acidifying additives: the role of the buffer system. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 57, 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Japenga, J. & Harmsen, K. (1990). Determination of mass balances and ionic balances in animal manure. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 38, 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S. C., Hatch, D. J. & Roberts, D. H. (1989). The effects of grassland management on nitrogen losses from grazed swards through ammonia volatilization; the relationship to excretal N returns from cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 112, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellerup, V. K. (1989). Husdyrgødning og dens anvendelse. Tidskrift for Plateavls Specialserie. Beretning nr. S1809. (In Danish).Google Scholar
Koefoed, N. & Hansen, B. (1990). Kvælstof- og fosfor balancer ved kvæg- og svinehold. NPo-forskning fra Miljostyrelsen No. AI (In Danish). Copenhagen, Denmark: National Agency of Environmental Protection.Google Scholar
Koster, I. W. (1989). Ammonia inhibition of methanogenesis during anaerobic digestion of concentrated manure slurries. PhD thesis, Agricultural University of Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Kroeker, E. J. (1979). Anaerobic treatment process stability. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 51, 718–727.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. L. (1979). Chemical Equilibria in Soils. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lundager Madsen, H. E. (1993). IONICS: Ionic Equilibrium Software for Personal Computers. Copenhagen, Denmark: The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University.Google Scholar
McGill, A. E. J. & Jackson, N. (1977). Changes in the short-chain carboxylic acid content and chemical oxygen demand of stored pig slurry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 424–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muck, R. E. & Richards, B. K. (1983). Losses of manurial nitrogen in free-stall barns. Agricultural Wastes 7, 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muck, R. E. & Steenhuis, T. S. (1982). Nitrogen losses from manure storages. Agricultural Wastes 4, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olesen, J. E. & Sommer, S. G. (1993). Modelling effects of wind speed and surface cover on ammonia volatilization from stored pig slurry. Atmospheric Environment 27A, 2567–2574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pain, B. F., Thompson, R. B., Rees, Y. J. & Skinner, J. H. (1990). Reducing gaseous losses of nitrogen from cattle slurry applied to grassland by the use of additives. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 50, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, J. W. & Beauchamp, E. G. (1989). Relationship between volatile fatty acids, total ammonia and pH in manure slurries. Biological Wastes 29, 313–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachhpal-Singh, & Nye, P. H. (1986). A model of ammonia volatilization from applied urea. I. Development of the model. Journal of Soil Science 37, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, M. & Self, P. G. (1988). Manipulation of powder X-ray diffraction data. CSIRO Division of Soils, Divisional Report 30.Google Scholar
Ringbom, A. (1963). Complexation in Analytical Chemistry. Chichester: Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar
Safley, L. M. Jr, Westerman, P. W. & Barker, J. C. (1986). Fresh dairy manure characteristics and barnlot nutrient losses. Agricultural Wastes 17, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (1988). SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 6.03 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Schulze, E.-D., De Vriers, W., Hauhs, M., Rosén, K., Rasmussen, L., Tamm, C.-O. & Nilsson, J. (1989). Critical loads for nitrogen deposition on forest ecosystems. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 48, 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, S. G. (1990). NH3-fordampning fra gyllebeholdere. NPo-forskning fra Miljostyrelsen No. A12 (In Danish). Copenhagen, Denmark: National Agency of Environmental Protection.Google Scholar
Stevens, R. J., Laughlin, R. J. & Frost, J. P. (1989). Effect of acidification with sulphuric acid on the volatilization of ammonia from cow and pig slurries. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 113, 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R. J., Laughlin, R. J. & Frost, J. P. (1992). Effects of separation, dilution, washing and acidification on ammonia volatilization from surface-applied cattle slurry. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 119, 383–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stumm, W. & Morgan, J. J. (1981). Aquatic Chemistry. An Introduction Emphasizing Chemical Equilibria in Natural Waters. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Tabatabai, M. A. (1982). Sulphur. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2 (Eds Page, A. L., Miller, R. H. & Keeney, D. R.), pp. 501–538. Wisconsin, USA: The American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
van der Molen, J., Beljaars, A. C. M., Chardon, W. J., Jury, W. A. & van Faassen, H. G. (1990). Ammonia volatilization from arable land after application of cattle slurry. 2. Derivation of a transfer model. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 38, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeeman, G., Sutter, K., Vens, T., Koster, M. & Wellinger, A. (1988). Psychrophilic digestion of dairy cattle and pig manure: start-up procedures of batch, fedbatch and CSTR-type digesters. Biological Wastes 26, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar