Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:47:40.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in soil properties of a newly-cleared Ultisol due to establishment of hedgerow species in alley cropping systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. R. Hulugalle  and
J. N. Ndi
N. R. Hulugalle
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Humid Forest Zone Station, BP 2008, Messa, Yaounde, Cameroon
J. N. Ndi
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Humid Forest Zone Station, BP 2008, Messa, Yaounde, Cameroon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study was initiated to evaluate the short-term (< 3 years) ability of some selected acid-soil adapted hedgerow species when planted in alley cropping systems to improve soil properties in a newly-cleared Ultisol (Typic Kandiudult) of southern Cameroon, 1990–92. The hedgerow species selected were Senna (Senna spectabilis), Flemingia (Flemingia congesta)and Acioa (Acioa barterii). A non-alley-cropped control was also included in the trial. The greatest quantities of prunings, and hence, mulch were produced by Senna and Flemingia. Exchangeable Ca, effective CEC and water infiltration were greatly increased in the alleys of plots where either Flemingia or Senna had been planted within 2·5 years of hedgerow establishment. The large amounts of mulch produced by Senna and Flemingia did, however, result in soil temperatures greater than those of the control or Acioa plots c. 1 year after application of the prunings as mulch. Root growth of Senna in the subsoil was significantly greater than that of either Acioa of Flemingia, but that of cassava was reduced by alley cropping with all three hedgerow species. Compared to the control or alley cropping with Acioa, maize and cassava yields were greater when alley cropped with either Flemingia or Senna hedgerows.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 122 , Issue 3 , June 1994 , pp. 435 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohm, W. (1979). Methods of Studying Root Systems. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, G. S. (1985). Soil Physics with BASIC: Transport Models for Soil-Plant Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. N. (1978). The physiology of plant tolerance to temperature extremes. In Crop Tolerance to Suboptimal Land Conditions(Ed. Jung, G. A.), pp. 173–191. Madison: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Federer, W. T. (1955). Experimental Design: Theory and Application. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Foy, C. D. & Fleming, A. L. (1978). The physiology of plant tolerance to excess available aluminium and manganese in acid soils. In Crop Tolerance to Suboptimal Land Conditions (Ed. Jung, G. A.), pp. 301–328. Madison: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Hauser, S. (1993). Distribution and activity of earthworms and contribution to nutrient recycling in alley cropping. Biology and Fertility of Soils 15, 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillel, D. (1980). Fundamentals of Soil Physics. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hulugalle, N. R. (1992). Contributory factors to soil spatial variability in an Ultisol. I. Burning vegetation residues in heaps during land clearing. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 23, 1859–1869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulugalle, N. R. & Kang, B. T. (1990). Effect of hedgerow species in alley cropping systems on surface soil physical properties of an Oxic Paleustalf in south-western Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 114, 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) (1990). Resource and Crop Management Program Annual Report for 1988. Ibadan: IITA.Google Scholar
Kang, B. T., Reynolds, L. & Atta-Krah, A. N. (1990). Alley farming. Advances in Agronomy 43, 315–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klute, A. (Ed.) (1986). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Madison: American Society of Agronomy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, R. (1987). Tropical Ecology and Physical Edaphology. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Lal, R. (1990). Soil Erosion in the Tropics: Principles and Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lal, R. & Ghuman, B. S. (1989). Biomass burning in windrows after clearing a tropical rainforest: effects on soil properties, evaporation and crop yields. Field Crops Research 22, 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michigan State University (1991). MSTAT-C: A Microcomputer Program for the Design, Management and Analysis of Agronomic Research Experiments. East Lansing: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Page, A. L., Miller, R. H. & Keeney, D. R. (Eds) (1982). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Madison: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Voorhees, W. B.,Allmaras, R. R. & Johnson, C. E. (1981). Alleviating temperature stress. In Modifying the Root Environment to Reduce Crop Stress (Eds Arkin, G. F. & Taylor, H. M.), pp. 217–266: St. Joseph: American Society of Agricultural Engineers.Google Scholar
Yamoah, C. F., Agboola, A. A., Wilson, G. F. & Mulonguy, K.. (1986). Soil properties as affected by the use of leguminous shrubs for alley cropping with maize. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 18, 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar