Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:19:40.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changes in faecal δ13C in response to changing proportions of legume (C3) and grass (C4) in the diet of sheep and cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. B. Coates
Affiliation:
Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, CSIRO, PMB, PO Aitkenvale, Townsville, Qld. 4814, Australia
A. P. A. Van Der Weide
Affiliation:
Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, CSIRO, PMB, PO Aitkenvale, Townsville, Qld. 4814, Australia
J. D. Kerr
Affiliation:
Biometrics Unit, CSIRO, Long Pocket Laboratories, Private Bag No. 3, Indooroopilly, Qld. 4068, Australia

Summary

Feeding studies were conducted in 1986 with penned sheep and cattle fed legume (C3) and grass (C4) hays mixed in different proportions. Large fluctuations in diet δ13C within or between days were associated with much smaller fluctuations in the δ13C of faeces. When the overall daily legume percentage in the diet was held constant, there was little variation in the δ13C of faeces irrespective of when during the day the legume, relative to the grass, was eaten.

Cattle set stocked on Stylosanthes/grass pastures in Queensland showed only minor variations in faecal δ13C within or between days in the short term. All animals within a group showed similar trends when the diet was changing. The changes in the δ13C of faeces from day to day reflected small but real changes in diet selection.

It was concluded that the δ13C of a single faecal sample reliably reflects the integrated diet over the previous 3–4 days of a free-grazing ruminant so that the frequency and pattern of faecal sampling for estimating diet composition may be determined by considerations other than reliability

Type
Animals
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balch, C. C. (1950). Factors affecting the utilization of food by dairy cows. 1. The rate of passage of food through the digestive tract. British Journal of Nutrition 4, 361388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, D. B., Schachenmann, P. & Jones, R. J. (1987). Reliability of extrusa samples collected from steers fistulated at the oesophagus to estimate the diet of resident animals in grazing experiments. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 27, 739745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, H. (1957). Isotopic standards for carbon and oxygen and correction factors for mass-spectrometric analysis of carbon dioxide. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Ada 12, 133149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haydock, K. P. & Shaw, N. H. (1975). The comparative yield method for estimating dry matter yield of pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 15, 663670.Google Scholar
Jones, R. J. (1981) The use of natural carbon isotope ratios in studies with grazing animals. In Forage Evaluation: Concepts and Techniques. (Eds Wheeler, J. L. & Mochrie, R. D.), pp. 227285. Armidale, NSW, Australia: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Jones, R. J., Ludlow, M. M., Troughton, J. H. & Blunt, C. G. (1979). Estimation of the proportion of C3 and C4 lant species in the diet of animals from the ratio of natural 12C and 13C isotopes in the faeces. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 91100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambourne, L. J. (1957). Measurement of feed intake of grazing sheep. 1. Rate of passage of inert reference materials through the ruminant digestive tract. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 48, 273285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Feuvre, R. P. & Jones, R. J. (1988). The static combustion of biological samples sealed in glass tubes as a preparation for δS13C determination. The Analyst 113, 817823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lourenço, A. J., Matsui, E. & Arcaro, I. (1984). Variações de valores de delta 13C nas fezes, leite e sangue de vacas em lactacao mantidas em pastagens exclusivas de gramineas ou consorciadas. Boletim de Industria Animal 41, 183192.Google Scholar
McManus, W. R. (1980). Oesophageal fistulation technique as an aid to diet evaluation of the grazing ruminant. In Forage Evaluation: Concepts and Techniques.(Eds Wheeler, J. L. & Mochrie, R. D.), pp. 249260. Armidale, NSW, Australia: CSIROGoogle Scholar
t Mannetje, L. & Haydock, R. P. (1963). The dry-weightrank method for the botanical analysis of pasture. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 268275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1966). The apparent retention of food in the reticulo-rumen at two levels of feeding by means of an hourly feeding technique. British Journal of Nutrition 20, 765773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed