Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T07:35:19.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carbohydrate levels and regrowth in perennial rye-grass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Alison Davies
Alison Davies
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a series of experiments in which variations in the level of carbohydrates in the plant have been brought about by means of short-term exposures to darkness and raised temperatures, it has been shown that:

1. The yield of leaf material after cutting is affected by pretreatments. This effect seems to be at least partly associated with the level of carbohydrates present in the stubble at the time of cutting.

2. The rate of growth of the plants is independent of the pretreatments imposed once growth is fully established.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , October 1965 , pp. 213 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberda, Th. (1956). Versl. Inst. landb. Onderz., Wageningen, over 1955, p. 48.Google Scholar
Alberda, Th. (1957). Plant & Soil, 8, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldous, A. E. (1930). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 22, 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, H. K. (1957). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 12, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, H. K. & Gabwood, E. A. (1961). J. Brit. Orassl. Soc. 16, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidwell, R. G. S., Barr, R. A. & Steward, P. C. (1964). Nature, Lond., 203, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. (1962). Rep. Welsh PL Breed. Sta. 1963, p. 68.Google Scholar
Graber, L. F., Nelson, N. T., Ltjekel, W. A. & Albert, W. B. (1928). Exp. Stn. Bee. 58, 326.Google Scholar
Harrison, C. M. (1934). Plant Physiol. 9, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoaqland, D. R. & Broyer, T. C. (1936). Plant Physiol. 11, 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, D. A. (1963). Bot. Bev. 29, 532.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. (1955). The Advanced Theory of Statistics, vol. n, 239. London: Charles Griffin.Google Scholar
Kbotkov, G. (1960). Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, vol. XII, 47. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Gottingen-HeidelburgGoogle Scholar
May, L. H. (1960). Herb. Abstr. 30, 239.Google Scholar
May, L. H. & Davidson, J. L. (1958). Aust. J. Agric. Bes. 9, 767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccarty, E. & Pbice, R. (1942). U.S.D.A. Tech. Bull. 818, 51 ppGoogle Scholar
Mcilvanie, S. K. (1942). Plant Physiol. 17, 540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Deb Plank, J. E. (1936). Biochem. J. 30, 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Pozo, I. M. (1963). Versl. Inst. landb. Onderz., Wageningen, 69 (17), 74 pp.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. A. & Hunt, I. V. (1936). Welsh J. Agric. 12 656Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. T. & Spbague, V. G. (1943). Plant Physiol. 18, 656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, J. T. & Sprague, V. G. (1953). Plant Physiol. 28, 304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troughton, A. (1957). The Underground Organs of Herbage Grasses. O.A.B. Bull. pp. 44, 49, 94.Google Scholar
Ward, C. Y. & Blaser, R. E. (1961). Crop Sci. 1, 366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinmann, H. (1948). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 3, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinmann, H. (1961). Herb. Abstr. 1, 255.Google Scholar