Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:27:28.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calcium and Hydrogen ion Concentration and the Interfacial Tension of Pyrethrum Extracts (With Four Text-figures.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. P. Hobson
R. P. Hobson
Affiliation:
Department of Insecticides and Fungicides, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The addition of a pyrethrum extract to a petroleum solvent, semirefined white spirit, considerably lowers its interfacial tension against water. The tension also depends upon the reaction of the aqueous phase, decreasing as the alkalinity increases.

2. The addition of agral W.B. to a solution of pyrethrum extract further lowers the interfacial tension more especially against acid solutions, thereby decreasing the sensitivity of the tension value to the pH of the aqueous phase.

3. The presence of calcium salts in the aqueous phase raises the interfacial tension of solutions of pyrethrum extract.

4. Alkaline salts counteract the effect of calcium salts, and the resulting tension values can be correlated with the ratio of calcium to hydroxyl ion concentration.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 1931 , pp. 101 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bancroft, W. D.J. Physical Ghem. (1913), 17, 501; (1915), 19, 275.Google Scholar
(2)Bhatnagar, S. S.J. Chem. Soc. (1920), 117, 542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Clowes, G. H. A.J. Physical Chem. (1916), 20, 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Donnan, F. G.Z. physikal Chem. (1899), 31, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Hardy, W. B.Proc. Roy. Soc. A (1913), 88, 306.Google Scholar
(6)Harkins, W. D. and Humphery, E. C.J. Amer. Chem. Soc. (1916), 38, 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Hartridge, H. and Peters, R. A.Proc. Roy. Soc. A (1922), 101, 348.Google Scholar
(8)Hastings, A. B., Murray, C. D. and Sendroy, J.J. Biol. Chem. (1927),71, 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Prideaux, E. B. R. and Ward, A. T.J. Chem. Soc. (1924), 125, 426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Sendroy, J. and Hastings, A. B.J. Biol. Chem. (1927), 71, 783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Staudinger, H. and Ruzicka, L.Helv. Chem. Act. (1924), 7, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Tattersfield, F. T., Hobson, R. P. and Gimingham, C. T.J. Agric. Sci. (1929), 19, 266. (Rothamsted Memoirs, 14.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Tattersfield, F. T. and Hobson, R. P.J. Agric. Sci. (1929), 19, 433. (Rothamsted Memoirs, 14.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar