Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:35:40.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brown manuring optimization in maize: impacts on weeds, crop productivity and profitability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2020

T. K. Das ,
S. Ghosh Open the ORCID record for S. Ghosh [Opens in a new window]  and
C. P. Nath
T. K. Das
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
S. Ghosh*
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
C. P. Nath
Affiliation:
Division of Crop Production, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India
*
Author for correspondence: S. Ghosh, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out in order to investigate if brown manuring (BM) using Sesbania plants can be used to control weeds in maize, especially Cyperus rotundus (Experiment I), and further to optimize the BM technology through appropriate Sesbania seed rate (S), 2,4-D application time (T) and dose (D) (Experiment II). Each BM treatment received a pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 1.0 kg a.i./ha. Experiment I showed that the BM practice using 15 kg/ha Sesbania seed and 2,4-D 0.50 kg a.i./ha applied at 25 DAS led to better control of weeds, especially C. rotundus and higher maize grain yield. Further optimization studies (Experiment II) indicated that among the factors S, T and D, the BM combination S~25 kg/ha, D~0.50 kg a.i./ha and T~25 DAS (i.e. S25T25D0.50) resulted in lowest weed density (3.1/m2) and dry weight (3.8 g/m2) and highest weed control index (89.2%) at 60 days after sowing (DAS) which was at par with another BM practice S15T25D0.50. However, the later BM combination led to significantly higher maize productivity (5.25 t/ha) and profitability (net returns (NR) $878/ha), which were 103 and 280% higher, respectively, than the weedy check (WC). The Sesbania seed rate S~15 kg/ha gave 7% higher maize grain yield and 12% higher NR than its corresponding level S~25 kg/ha. Therefore, Sesbania BM with 15 kg seeds/ha and 2,4-D at 0.50 kg a.i/ha applied at 25 DAS can be recommended for effective and eco-friendly weed management in maize, which would provide higher maize grain yield and enhance farmers' profitability.

Keywords

Cyperus rotundusintegrated weed managementmaize yield and economicsSesbania co-culturetank-mix atrazine + pendimethalin
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 157 , Issue 7-8 , October 2019 , pp. 599 - 610
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: ICAR-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Pune, India.

References

Asres, B and Das, TK (2011) Diversity and integrated management of weeds in highland wheat of Northern Ethiopia. Plant Protection Quarterly 26, 8–16.Google Scholar
Behera, B, Das, TK, Ghosh, S, Kaur, R and Singh, R (2018) Brown manuring in maize (Zea mays): effects on weed interference and crop productivity. Indian Journal of Agronomy 63, 524–527.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, R, Das, TK, Pramanik, P, Ganeshan, V, Saad, AA and Sharma, AR (2013) Impacts of conservation agriculture on soil aggregation and aggregate-associated N under irrigated agroecosystem of Indo-Gangetic Plains. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 96, 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharyya, R, Das, TK, Sudhishri, S, Dudwal, B, Sharma, AR, Bhatia, A and Singh, G (2015) Conservation agriculture effects on soil organic carbon accumulation and crop productivity under a rice–wheat cropping system in the western Indo-Gangetic Plains. European Journal of Agronomy 70, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, TK (1999) Is transformation of weed data always necessary?. Annals of Agricultural Research 20, 335–341.Google Scholar
Das, TK (2001) Towards better appraisal of herbicide bio-efficacy. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 71, 676–678.Google Scholar
Das, TK and Yaduraju, NT (2011) Effects of missing-row sowing supplemented with row spacing and nitrogen on weed interference and growth and yield of wheat. Crop & Pasture Science 62, 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, TK, Bhattacharyya, R, Sharma, AR, Das, S, Saad, AA and Pathak, H (2013) Impacts of conservation agriculture on total soil organic carbon retention potential under an irrigated agro-ecosystem of the western Indo-Gangetic Plains. European Journal of Agronomy 51, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, TK, Ahlawat, IPS and Yaduraju, NT (2014 a) Littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor) resistance to clodinafop-propargyl in wheat fields in north-western India: appraisal and management. Weed Biology and Management 14, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, TK, Paul, AK and Yaduraju, NT (2014 b) Density-effect and economic threshold of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) in soybean. Journal of Pest Science 87, 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, TK, Saharawat, YS, Bhattacharyya, R, Sudhishri, S, Bandyopadhyay, KK, Sharma, AR and Jat, ML (2018) Conservation agriculture effects on crop and water productivity, profitability and soil organic carbon accumulation under a maize-wheat cropping system in the North-western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research 215, 222–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dass, S, Jat, ML, Singh, KP and HK, RAI (2008) Agro-economic analysis of maize based cropping system in India. Indian Journal of Fertilizers 4, 49–62.Google Scholar
Gangaiah, B and Babu, MBB (2016) Brown manuring as a tool of weed management and contributor to nitrogen nutrition of direct wet seeded rice. ORYZA – An International Journal on Rice, 53, 415–421.Google Scholar
Gilreath, JP and Santos, BM (2004) Efficacy of methyl bromide alternatives on purple nutsedge control (Cyperus rotundus) in tomatoes and peppers. Weed Technology 18, 141–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, RK and Seth, A (2007) A review of resource conserving technologies for sustainable management of the rice–wheat cropping systems of the Indo-Gangetic plains (IGP). Crop Protection 26, 436–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, ML (1973) Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi, India: Prentice Hall of India Limited.Google Scholar
Jalota, SK, Buttar, GS, Sood, A, Chahal, GBS, Ray, SS and Panigrahy, S (2008) Effects of sowing date tillage and residue management on productivity of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system in northwest India. Soil and Tillage Research 99, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, M, Das, TK and Yaduraju, NT (2012) An integrated approach for management of Cyperus rotundus (purple nutsedge) in soybean-wheat cropping system. Crop Protection 33, 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladha, JK, Kumar, V, Alam, MM, Sharma, S, Gathala, MK, Chandra, P, Saharawat, YS, Balasubramanian, V (2009) Integrating crop and resource management technologies for enhanced productivity, profitability and sustainability of the rice–wheat system in South Asia. In Ladha, JK, Singh, Y, Erenstein, O and Hardy, B (eds), Integrated Crop and Resource Management in the Rice–Wheat System of South Asia. Los Banos, Philippines: IRRI and Asian Development Bank, pp. 69–108.Google Scholar
Lal, R (1997) Residue management, conservation tillage and soil restoration for mitigating greenhouse effect by CO2-enrichment. Soil and Tillage Research 43, 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitra, S and Zaman, A (2017) Brown manuring, an effective technique for yield sustainability and weed management of cereal crops: a review. International Journal of Bioresource Science 4, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nath, CP, Das, TK and Rana, KS (2016) Effects of herbicides and tillage practices on weeds and summer mungbean (Vigna radiata) in wheat (Triticum aestivum)-mungbean cropping sequence. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 86, 860–864.Google Scholar
Nawaz, A, Farooq, M, Lal, R, Rehman, A, Hussain, T and Nadeem, A (2017) Influence of Sesbania brown manuring and rice residue mulch on soil health, weeds and system productivity of conservation rice–wheat systems. Land Degradation and Development 28, 1078–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, BC, Cole, CV, Watenabe, FS and Dean, LA (1954) Estimation of Available Phosphorus by Extraction with Sodium Carbonate. Washington, USA: USDA, p. 19.Google Scholar
Oyeogbe, AI, Das, TK, Bhatia, A and Singh, SB (2017) Adaptive nitrogen and integrated weed management in conservation agriculture: impacts on agronomic productivity, greenhouse gas emissions, and herbicide residues. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 189, 198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pandey, AK, Prakash, V, Singh, RD and Mani, VP (2001) Integrated weed management in maize (Zea mays). Indian Journal of Agronomy 46, 260–265.Google Scholar
Ram, H, Singh, Y, Saini, KS, Kler, DS, Timsina, J and Humphreys, EJ (2012) Agronomic and economic evaluation of permanent raised beds, no tillage and straw mulching for an irrigated maize–wheat system in northwest India. Experimental Agriculture 48, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, A, Veeramani, A and Prema, P (2012) Effect of brown manuring on weed growth, yield and economics of irrigated maize. Indian Journal of Weed Science 44, 204–206.Google Scholar
Rangaswamy, R (2006) A Text Book of Agricultural Statistics. New Delhi, India: New Age International.Google Scholar
Saad, AA, Das, TK, Rana, DS, Sharma, AR, Bhattacharyya, R and Lal, K (2016) Energy auditing of maize-wheat-greengram cropping system under conventional and conservation agriculture in irrigated North-western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Energy 116, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A, Singh, SC, Sharma, SN, Singh, AK, Singh, R and Pal, AK (2000). Agronomy of maize inbred parental line. Indian Farming 1, 18–20.Google Scholar
Sharma, AR, Singh, R, Dhyani, SK and Dube, RK (2010 a) Effect of live mulching with annual legumes on performance of maize (Zea mays) and residual effect on following wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian Journal of Agronomy 55, 177–183.Google Scholar
Sharma, AR, Singh, R, Dhyani, SK and Dube, RK (2010 b) Moisture conservation and nitrogen recycling through legume mulching in rainfed maize (Zea mays)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 87, 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, AR, Singh, R, Dhyani, SK and Dube, RK (2011) Agronomic and economic evaluation of mulching in rainfed maize-wheat cropping system in the Western Himalayan Region of India. Journal of Crop Improvement 25, 392–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Y, Singh, B and Timsina, J (2005) Crop residue management for nutrient cycling and improving soil productivity in rice-based cropping systems in the tropics. Advances in Agronomy 85, 269–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S, Ladha, JK, Gupta, RK, Rao, AN and Singh, PP (2007) Evaluation of mulching, intercropping with Sesbania and herbicides use for weed management in dry seed rice (Oryza sativa L.). Crop Protection 26, 518–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S, Chhokar, RS, Gopal, R, Ladha, JK, Gupta, RK, Kumar, V, Singh, M (2009) Integrated weed management: a key to success for direct-seeded rice in the Indo-Gangetic plains. In Ladha, JK, Singh, Y, Erenstein, O and Hardy, B (eds), Integrated Crop and Resource Management in the Rice–Wheat System of South Asia. Los Banos, Philippines: IRRI and Asian Development Bank, pp. 261–278.Google Scholar
Singh, S, Walia, US, Kaur, R and Shergill, LS (2010) Chemical control of Cyperus rotundus in maize. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 42, 189–192.Google Scholar
Subbiah, BV and Asija, GL (1956) A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science 25, 259–260.Google Scholar
Susha, VS, Das, TK and Sharma, AR (2014) Weed management in maize (Zea mays) in western Indo-Gangetic Plains through tank-mix herbicide application. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 84, 1363–1368.Google Scholar
Susha, VS, Das, TK, Nath, CP, Pandey, R, Paul, S and Ghosh, S (2018) Impacts of tillage and herbicide mixture on weed interference, agronomic productivity and profitability of a maize–wheat system in the North-western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research 219, 180–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuti, MD and Das, TK (2011). Sequential application of metribuzin on weed control, growth and yield of soybean (Glycine max). Indian Journal of Agronomy 56, 57–61.Google Scholar
Verhulst, N, Kienle, F, Sayre, KD, Deckers, J, Raes, D, Limon-Ortega, A, Tijerina-Chavez, L and Govaerts, B (2011) Soil quality as affected by tillage-residue management in a wheat-maize irrigated bed planting system. Plant and Soil 340, 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkley, A and Black, IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
X-RATES (2016) Exchange rates. Available at https://xrates.com/average/from=INR&to=USD (Accessed 7 December 2016).Google Scholar