Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:14:41.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The breeding of two-row winter-hardy barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. D. H. Bell
G. D. H. Bell
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, School of Agriculture, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has been shown in these breeding investigations that it is possible to combine the winter hardiness of low-yielding varieties possessing characters unsuited for cultivation in this country, with many of the desirable features of the best two-row spring varieties at present grown for malting purposes. Although, with the production of the new hybrid variety Pioneer, a definite advance has been made in the production of a two-row winter barley for malting, there is no reason to suppose that further improvements cannot be made, and work is proceeding with this object in view. But in addition to the special problem of malting barley, the results so far obtained indicate that there is considerable scope in this hybridization of winter and spring varieties for the production of forms suitable for growing as feeding barleys. The hybridization of varieties differing so widely in their morphological and physiological characters, and also in their ecological adaptation, gives a wide basis for the selection of a great range of forms. On the other hand, distant hybridization of this type is liable to result in the production of a very high proportion of worthless material, involving the loss of the highest expression of the very specialized characters necessary in a barley possessing the attributes of a high-yielding malting variety with satisfactory field characters.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , October 1944 , pp. 223 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bell, G. D. H. (1937 a). Z. Zücht. 22, 81–146.Google Scholar
Bell, G. D. H. (1937 b). J. Agric. Sci. 27, 377–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, G. D. H. (1939). J. Agric. Sci. 29, 175–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoff, M. A. (1939). Z. Pflanzenz. 23, 47–90.Google Scholar
Constantinescu, E. (1934). Z. Zücht. A 19, 439–53.Google Scholar
Gaines, E. F. (1917). Bull. Wash. St. agric. Exp. Sta. 135, 3–61.Google Scholar
Grebennikov, P. E. (1935). Proc. agric. Inst. Krasnodar, 1, 65–79.Google Scholar
Harlan, H. V. & Shaw, (1929). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 21, 439–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, J. B. (1936). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 28, 374–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. A. (1932). Z. Zücht. A 17, 217–227.Google Scholar
Hunter, H. (1939). J. Inst. Brew. 45, 286–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneen, Eric & Blish, M. J. (1941). J. agric. Res. 62, 1–26.Google Scholar
Kuckuck, H.See Bibliogr. monogr. Pl. Gen., Hajimi Matsuura, p. 155 (1933).Google Scholar
Kuckuck, H. (1933 b). Proc. World's Grain Exhib. and Conf. 2, 83–84.Google Scholar
Levitt, J. (1941). Mimeographed Publ. Univ. Minn.Google Scholar
Lewicki, S.See Bibliogr. Monogr. Pl. Gen., Hajimi Matsuura, p. 154 (1933).Google Scholar
Neatby, K. W. (1926, 1929). Sci. Agric. 7, 77–84; 9, 701–18.Google Scholar
Rudorf, W. (1938). Züchter, 10, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiemann, E. See Bibliog. Monogr. Pl. Gen., Hajimi Matsuura, p. 154 (1933).Google Scholar
Takahashi, N. See Bibliog. Monogr. Pl. Gen., Hajimi Matsuura, p. 154 (1933).Google Scholar
Tschermak, E. See Bibliog. Monogr. Pl. Gen., Hajimi Matsuura, p. 154 (1933).Google Scholar
Tschermak-Seysenegg, E. (1932). Dtsch. landw. Pr. 59, 423.Google Scholar
Vavilov, W. I. & Kouznetsov, E. S. See Bibliog. Monogr. Pl. Gen., Hajimi Matsuura, p. 154 (1933).Google Scholar
Wishart, John (1940). Imp. Bur. Pl. Br. Gen. Camb. pp. 30–35.Google Scholar