Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:10:55.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bloat investigations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. E. Alder
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Berks.
William Davies
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Berks.

Extract

A series of seven experiments were carried out between May and September 1954 at the Grassland Research Institute as part of a co-operative study of bloat, which the Agricultural Research Council had helped to organize.

Hereford colour-marked steers were grazed or fed on legume-dominant herbage in an endeavour to produce pasture bloat. Observations were made to determine patterns of animal behaviour and bloat incidence. Heart rates were determined both before and during the experiments and jugular blood samples were taken for determination of cholin-esterase levels. Herbage samples were analysed botanically in order to determine the type of material eaten, and chemically for nitrogen content. Other herbage samples were placed in cold storage.

In the seven experiments (375 cattle feeding or grazing days) only twenty-seven cases of mild bloat and five cases of moderate bloat were recorded. This is surprising, because pains had been taken to provide feed that would by all normal standards be regarded as likely to induce bloat in cattle.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bath, D. R. (1955). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 64.Google Scholar
Cole, H. H., Huffman, C. F., Kleiber, M., Olson, T. M. & Schalk, A. F. (1945). J. Anim. Sci. 4, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, R. W. (1953). J. Amer. Vet. Med. Ass. 122, 345.Google Scholar
Ferguson, W. S. & Terry, R. A. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 46, 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, W. S. (1954). Brit. Vet. Ass. Publ. no. 24, 77.Google Scholar
Hancocks, J. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, D. F. & Park, P. P. (1953). Nature, Lond., 172, 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, A. T. (1954 a). Proc. Ruakura Fmrs' Conf. Week, N.Z. 178.Google Scholar
Johns, A. T. (1954 b). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 36, 289.Google Scholar
Johns, A. T. (1956). Vet. Rev. Annot. Weybridge, 2, 107.Google Scholar
Lawrence, A. J. L. (1954). N.A.A.S. Quart. Rev. 7, 16.Google Scholar
Papworth, D. S. (1958). Biochem. J. (in the Press).Google Scholar