Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:19:42.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of deficit irrigation strategies by using SUBSTOR-Potato model in a semi-arid area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2020

F. Montoya ,
D. Camargo ,
J. I. Córcoles ,
A. Domínguez Open the ORCID record for A. Domínguez [Opens in a new window]  and
J. F. Ortega
F. Montoya
Affiliation:
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Regional Center of Water Research, Campus Universitario, Albacete02071, Spain
D. Camargo
Affiliation:
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Regional Center of Water Research, Campus Universitario, Albacete02071, Spain
J. I. Córcoles
Affiliation:
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Regional Center of Water Research, Campus Universitario, Albacete02071, Spain
A. Domínguez*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Regional Center of Water Research, Campus Universitario, Albacete02071, Spain
J. F. Ortega
Affiliation:
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Regional Center of Water Research, Campus Universitario, Albacete02071, Spain
*
Author for correspondence: A. Domínguez, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In areas where water is scarce, the use of regulated deficit irrigation, combined with decision support system tools, may decrease the impact of agriculture on natural water resources, as well as on energy consumption, thereby improving the profitability of farms. With this aim, the SUBSTOR-Potato model (incorporated in the DSSAT Program) was evaluated with a 2-year field test (2011 and 2012) conducted in a semi-arid area (Albacete, Spain) applying four irrigation levels (120, 100, 80 and 60% of irrigation requirements). Subsequently, the model was used for simulating the potato yield under several deficit irrigation strategies (ISs) during 30 years of a semi-arid climate (1988–2017) and determining the most profitable option. The considered ISs were deemed those most suitable from the yield and water productivity point of view by some authors. The model performance for tuber yield was satisfactory with an index of agreement >0.91 and errors between 0.71 and 3.06 × 103 kg/ha. The ISs simulated with SUBSTOR-Potato showed that slight deficit irrigation (5–10%) may increase the water productivity and profitability of the farms. Moreover, tuber formation (from onset of tuber initiation to harvest) was shown to be the most sensitive stage, therefore it is highly recommended to avoid deficit during this stage, which would cause a large reduction in yield (around 8 t/ha, depending on the level of deficit suffered by the crop).

Keywords

Centre pivot irrigation systemdecision support systemprofitabilitytuber yieldwater productivity
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 157 , Issue 7-8 , October 2019 , pp. 578 - 591
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, RG, Pereira, LS, Raes, D and Smith, M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
Allen, RG, Pereira, LS, Howell, TA and Jensen, ME (2011) Evapotranspiration information reporting: II. Recommended documentation. Agricultural Water Management 98, 921–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araya, A, Habtu, S, Hadgu, KM, Kebede, A and Dejene, T (2010) Test of AquaCrop model in simulating biomass and yield of water deficient and irrigated barley (Hordeum vulgare). Agricultural Water Management 97, 1838–1846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, VK, Nath, JC and Singh, CB (2013) Analyzing potato response to irrigation and nitrogen regimes in a sub-tropical environment using SUBSTOR-Potato model. Agricultural Water Management 124, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benli, B, Pala, M, Stöckle, C and Oweis, T (2007) Assessment of winter wheat production under early sowing with supplemental irrigation in a cold highland environment using CropSyst simulation model. Agricultural Water Management 93, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boote, KJ, Jones, JW, Hoogenboom, G and White, JW (2010) The role of crop systems simulation in agriculture and environment. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems 1, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camargo, DC, Montoya, F, Córcoles, JI and Ortega, JF (2015 a) Modeling the impacts of irrigation treatments on potato growth and development. Agricultural Water Management 150, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camargo, DC, Montoya, F, Ortega, JF and Córcoles, JI (2015 b) Potato yield and water use efficiency responses to irrigation in semiarid conditions. Agronomy Journal 107, 2120–2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camargo, DC, Montoya, F, Moreno, MA, Ortega, JF and Córcoles, JI (2016) Impact of water deficit on light interception, radiation use efficiency and leaf area index in a potato crop (Solanum tuberosum L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 154, 662–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrión, F, Tarjuelo, JM, Hernández, D and Moreno, MA (2013) Design of microirrigation subunit of minimum cost with proper operation. Irrigation Science 31, 1199–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Confalonieri, R, Bellocchi, G, Boschetti, M and Acutis, M (2009) Evaluation of parameterization strategies for rice modelling. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 7, 680–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Córcoles, JI, de Juan, JA, Ortega, JF, Tarjuelo, JM and Moreno, MA (2010) Management evaluation of Water Users Associations using benchmarking techniques. Agricultural Water Management 98, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, RB, Peart, RM, Jones, JW, Boote, KJ and Allen, LH (1990) Simulation as a tool for analyzing crop response to climate change. Transaction of ASAE 33, 981–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daccache, A, Weatherhead, EK, Stalham, MA and Knox, JW (2011) Impacts of climate change on irrigated potato production in a humid climate. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 151, 1641–1653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daryanto, S, Wang, L and Jacinthe, PA (2016) Drought effects on root and tuber production: a meta-analysis. Agricultural Water Management 176, 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Juan Valero, JA, Ortega, JFO and Tarjuelo Martín-Benito, JM (2003) Sistemas de Cultivo. Evaluación de Itinerarios Técnicos. Madrid, Spain: Mundi-Prensa.Google Scholar
Domínguez, A, Jiménez, M, Tarjuelo, JM, de Juan, JA, Martínez-Romero, A and Leite, KN (2012 a) Simulation of onion crop behavior under optimized regulated deficit irrigation using MOPECO model in a semi-arid environment. Agricultural Water Management 113, 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, A, De Juan, JA, Tarjuelo, JM, Martínez, RS and Martínez-Romero, A (2012 b) Determination of optimal regulated deficit irrigation strategies for maize in a semi-arid environment. Agricultural Water Management 110, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, A, Martínez-romero, A, Leite, KN, Tarjuelo, JM, de Juana, JA and López-Urreac, R (2013) Combination of typical meteorological year with regulated deficit irrigation to improve the profitability of garlic growing in central Spain. Agricultural Water Management 130, 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, A, Martínez-Navarro, A, López-Mata, E, Tarjuelo, JM and Martínez-Romero, A (2017) Real farm management depending on the available volume of irrigation water (part I): financial analysis. Agricultural Water Management 192, 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabeiro, C, Martín De Santa Olalla, F and De Juan, JA (2001) Yield and size of deficit irrigated potatoes. Agricultural Water Management 48, 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahem, M and Haverkort, AJ (1988) Comparison of the growth of potato crops grown in autumn and spring in North Africa. Potato Research 31, 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2018) FAOSTAT. Rome, Italy: FAO. Available online from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (Accessed 6 November 2019).Google Scholar
Farahani, HJ, Izzi, G and Oweis, TY (2009) Parameterization and evaluation of the AquaCrop model for full and deficit irrigated cotton. Agronomy Journal 101, 469–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fereres, E and Soriano, MA (2007) Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geerts, S and Raes, D (2009) Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas. Agricultural Water Management 96, 1275–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, DC and Singh, U (1998) Nitrogen balance and crop response to nitrogen in upland and lowland cropping systems. In Tsuji, GY, Hoogenboom, G, Thornton, PK (eds), Understanding Options for Agricultural Production. System Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, TS, Johnson, BS and Ritchie, JT (1993) A Simulation Model for Potato Growth and Development: SUBSTOR-Potato Version 2.0. IBSNAT Research Report Series 02. Honolulu, HI, USA: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Hassan, AA, Sarkar, AA, Ali, MH and Karim, NH (2002) Effect of deficit irrigation at different growth stages on the yield of potato. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 5, 128–134.Google Scholar
Heng, LK, Hsiao, T, Evett, S, Howell, T and Steduto, P (2009) Validating the FAO AquaCrop model for irrigated and water deficient field maize. Agronomy Journal 101, 488–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoogenboom, G, Jones, JW, Wilkens, PW, Porter, CH, Boote, KJ, Hunt, LA, Singh, U, Lizaso, JL, White, JW, Uryasev, O, Ogoshi, R, Koo, J, Shelia, V and Tsuji, GY (2015) Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) Version 4.6. Available at http://dssat.net (Accessed 15 July 2016). Gainesville, Florida, USA: DSSAT Foundation.Google Scholar
ITAP (2017) Lonja. Información de Precios. Albacete, Spain: ITAP. Available at http://www.itap.es/inicio/lonja/ (Accessed 12 October 2018).Google Scholar
Jefferies, RA and Mackerron, DKL (1989) Radiation interception and growth of irrigated and droughted potato (Solanum tuberosum). Field Crops Research 22, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, M, De Juan, JA, Tarjuelo, JM and Ortega, JF (2010) Effect of irrigation uniformity on evapotranspiration and onion yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 148, 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, JW, Hoogenboom, G, Porter, CH, Boote, KJ, Batchelor, WD, Hunt, LA, Wilkens, PW, Singh, U, Gijsman, AJ and Ritchie, JT (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 235–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karam, F, Amacha, N, Fahed, S, EL Asmar, T and Domínguez, A (2014) Response of potato to full and deficit irrigation under semiarid climate: agronomic and economic implications. Agricultural Water Management 142, 144–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, MS, van Eck, HJ and Struik, PC (2013) Model-based evaluation of maturity type of potato using a diverse set of standard cultivars and a segregating diploid population. Potato Research 56, 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kifle, M and Gebretsadikan, TG (2016) Yield and water use efficiency of furrow irrigated potato under regulated deficit irrigation, Atsibi-Wemberta, North Ethiopia. Agricultural Water Management 170, 133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, KN, Martínez-Romero, A, Tarjuelo, JM and Domínguez, A (2015) Distribution of limited irrigation water based on optimized regulated deficit irrigation and typical meteorological year concepts. Agricultural Water Management 148, 164–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Léllis, BC, Carvalho, DF, Martínez-Romero, A, Tarjuelo, JM and Domínguez, A (2017) Effective management of irrigation water for carrot under constant and optimized regulated deficit irrigation in Brazil. Agricultural Water Management 192, 294–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackerron, DKL and Davies, HV (1986) Markers for maturity and senescence in the potato crop. Potato Research 29, 427–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahdian, MH and Gallichand, J (1995) Validation of the SUBSTOR model for simulating soil water content. Transactions of the ASAE 38, 513–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAPAMA (2018) Anuario de Estadística. Avance de Anuario 2016. Madrid, Spain: MAPAMA. Available at http://www.mapama.gob.es/es/ (Accessed 25 September 2018).Google Scholar
Meier, U (2001) Growth Stages of Mono- and Dicotyledonous Plants: BBCH Monograph, 2nd Edn.Bonn, Germany: Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry.Google Scholar
Montoya, F, Camargo, D, Ortega, F, Córcoles, JI and Domínguez, A (2016) Evaluation of AquaCrop model for a potato crop under different irrigation conditions. Agricultural Water Management 164, 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, MA, Ortega, JF, Córcoles, JI, Martínez, A and Tarjuelo, JM (2010) Energy analysis of irrigation delivery systems: monitoring and evaluation of proposed measures for improving energy efficiency. Irrigation Science 28, 445–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, SH and Hwang, KE (1975) Water usage by potato plants at different stages of growth. American Potato Journal 52, 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NRCS (2004) Part 630 Hydrology. National Engineering Handbook. Washington, DC, USA: United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Onder, S, Caliskan, ME, Onder, D and Caliskan, S (2005) Different irrigation methods and water stress effects on potato yield and yield components. Agricultural Water Management 73, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, JF, De Juan, JA and Tarjuelo, JM (2005) Improving water management: the irrigation advisory service of Castilla-La Mancha (Spain). Agricultural Water Management 77, 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega Álvarez, JF, De Juan Valero, JA, Tarjuelo Martín-Benito, JM and López Mata, E (2004) MOPECO: an economic optimization model for irrigation water management. Irrigation Science 23, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadakis, J (1966) Climates of the World and Their Agricultural Potentialities. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Published by the author.Google Scholar
Paredes, P, D'Agostino, D, Assif, M, Todorovic, M and Pereira, LS (2018) Assessing potato transpiration, yield and water productivity under various water regimes and planting dates using the FAO dual Kc approach. Agricultural Water Management 195, 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raes, D, Steduto, P, Hsiao, TC and Fereres, E (2012) AquaCrop Reference Manual, AquaCrop version 4.0. Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
Raymundo, R, Asseng, S, Prassad, R, Kleinwechter, U, Concha, J, Condori, B, Bowen, W, Wolf, J, Olesen, JE, Dong, Q, Zotarelli, L, Gastelo, M, Alva, A, Travasso, M, Quiroz, R, Arora, V, Graham, W and Porter, C (2017) Performance of the SUBSTOR-potato model across contrasting growing conditions. Field Crops Research 202, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, JT (1998) Soil water balance and plant stress. In Tsuji, GY, Hoogenboom, G and Thornton, PK (eds), Understanding Options for Agricultural Production. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxton, KE, Rawls, W, Romberger, JS and Papendick, RI (1986) Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50, 1031–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shock, CC, Feibert, EBG and Saunders, LD (1998) Potato yield and quality response to deficit irrigation. HortScience 33, 655–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, TR and Muchow, RC (1999) Radiation use efficiency. Advances in Agronomy 65, 215–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snapp, SS and Fortuna, AM (2003) Predicting nitrogen availability in irrigated potato systems. HortTechnology 13, 598–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soil Survey Staff (2006) Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 10th Edn.Washington, DC, USA: USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.Google Scholar
Šťastná, M, Toman, F and Dufková, J (2010) Usage of SUBSTOR model in potato yield prediction. Agricultural Water Management 97, 286–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steduto, P, Hsiao, TC, Raes, D and Fereres, E (2009) AquaCrop – The FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: I. Concepts and underlying principles. Agronomy Journal 101, 426–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stöckle, CO, Donatelli, M and Nelson, R (2003) Cropsyst, a cropping systems simulation model. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarjuelo, JM, Rodriguez-Diaz, JA, Abadía, R, Camacho, E, Rocamora, C and Moreno, MA (2015) Efficient water and energy use in irrigation modernization: lessons from Spanish case studies. Agricultural Water Management 162, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todorovic, M, Albrizio, R, Zivotic, L, Abi Saab, MT, Stöckle, C and Steduto, P (2009) Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst, and WOFOST models in the simulation of sunflower growth under different water regimes. Agronomy Journal 101, 509–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travasso, MI, Caldiz, DO and Saluzzo, JA (1996) Yield prediction using the SUBSTOR-potato model under Argentinian conditions. Potato Research 39, 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varlet-Grancher, C, Gosse, G, Chartier, M, Sinoquet, H, Bonhomme, R and Allirand, JM (1989) Mise au point: rayonnement solaire absorbé ou intercepté par un couvert végétal. Agronomie 9, 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villalobos, FJ, Mateos, L, Orgaz, F and Fereres, E (2009) Fitotecnica: Bases y Tecnologías de la Producción Agrícola, 2nd Edn.Madrid, Spain: Ediciones Mundi-Prensa.Google Scholar
Vos, J and Haverkort, AJ (2007) Water availability and potato crop performance. In Vreugdenhil, D, Bradshaw, J, Gebhardt, C, Govers, F, MacKerron, DKL, Taylor, MA and Ross, HA (eds), Potato Biology and Biotechnology Advances and Perspectives. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmott, CJ (1982) Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 63, 1309–1313.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woli, P, Hoogenboom, G and Alva, A (2016) Simulation of potato yield, nitrate leaching, and profit margins as influenced by irrigation and nitrogen management in different soils and production regions. Agricultural Water Management 171, 120–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Z, Andersen, MN and Plauborg, F (2016) Radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of potato affected by different N fertigation and irrigation regimes. European Journal of Agronomy 81, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar