Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:06:39.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An assessment of barley straw and oat hulls as energy sources for yearling cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. Smith
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RO2 9 AT
W. H. Broster
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RO2 9 AT
J. W. Siviter
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RO2 9 AT

Summary

Three experiments, each consisting of a feeding trial plus a digestibility and nitrogen retention study, compared long barley straw with rolled barley as basal diets and oat hulls with maize starch as energy supplements for yearling dairy cattle. The protein ontent of the diets was varied by the addition of flshmeal.

Growth rates were reduced by the dietary combination of high fibre and low protein, so that diets rich in straw, or containing a supplement of oat hulls, gave a large response to a supplement of fishmeal compared with low straw or maize starch supplemented diets. The data suggest a crude protein concentration of 115 g/kg dry matter as a requirement for high fibre diets supplemented with fishmeal, when fed to yearling cattle. Retention of nitrogen reflected the pattern of live-weight gain. Molar proportions of VFA were affected by changes in the roughage: concentrates ratio, except where energy and protein intakes were both low.

Barley straw was of a higher nutritive value than oat hulls.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The nutrient requirements of farm livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. Technical Reviews and Summaries. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. (1967). Problems on predicting the value of non-protein nitrogen as a substitute for protein in rations for farm animal ruminants. World Review of Animal Production 3, 8491.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1974). Metabolizable energy and feeding systems for ruminants. University of Nottingham Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers 7 (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 321. London: Butterworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H. & Smith, T. (1972). Compensatory growth. Report, National Institute for Research in Dairying, p. 74.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Smith, T., Broster, V. J. & Siviter, J. W. (1978). Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. X. Effect on nitrogen utilization for growth of chemical and physical treatment of the principal source of protein in the diet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 299310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H., Smith, T., Siviter, J. W., Schuller, E. & Broster, V. J. (1978). Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. XI. Further observations on the effect of energy intake on protein utilization. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 399413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H., Sutton, J. D., Tuck, V. J. & Balch, C. C. (1965). The effect of the addition of large amounts of cod liver oil to the rations of yearling heifers on their rate of live-weight gain. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 65, 227232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H., Tuck, V. J., Smith, T. & Johnson, V. W. (1969). Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. VII. Observations on the effect of the energy intake on the utilization of protein in growth and in lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs (2nd edition). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. C, Reed, W. D. C. & Topps, J. H. (1964). Studies of protein requirements of ruminants. 4. Liveweight changes of two breeds of African cattle given three levels of dietary protein each with varying amounts of digestible energy. British Journal of Nutrition 18, 519528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feedingstuffs Evaluation Unit (1975). First Report. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & Reid, G. W. (1974). Long and short term effects on intake of pelleting a roughage for sheep. Animal Production 19, 7786.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & Reid, G. W. (1979). Complete diets for dairy cows: comparisons of feeding to appetite with rationing according to milk yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 715726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, T. W. (1978). Effects of variations in energy and protein intake on digestibility, nitrogen balance and carcass composition in British Friesian castrate male cattle. Animal Production 26, 233243.Google Scholar
Kay, M. (1976). Meeting the energy and protein requirements of the growing animal. In Principles of Cattle Production (ed. Swan, H. and Broster, W. H.), pp. 255269. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Kellner, O. (1915). The Scientific Feeding of Animals. Translated by Goodwin, William. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1957). Blood-urea concentration in relation to protein utilization in the ruminant. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 48, 438446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food (1975). Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. M.A.F.F.: Technical Bulletin no. 33.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. (1977). Nitrogen digestion and utilization by young and lactating ruminants. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics (ed. Bourne, G. H., Georgia, Atlanta), pp. 225257. Basel: S. Karger.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B., Balch, C. C, Miller, E. L., Ørskov, E. R. & Smith, R. H. (1977). Calculation of the N-requirement for ruminants from nitrogen metabolism studies. In Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, pp. 126129. Pudoc: Wageningen.Google Scholar
Schiemann, R., Nehring, K., Hoffman, L., Jentsch, W. & Chudy, A. (1971). Energetische Futterbewertung und Energienormen, Berlin: VEB Deutscher Landwirtschaft Verlag.Google Scholar
Smith, T. (1978). The utilization of poor quality roughages by yearling dairy heifers. Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Smith, T. (1979). The collection of faeces and urine from steers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 30, 215217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. & Broster, W. H. (1979). Measurements of straw breakdown in the rumen using the nylon bag technique. In Straw Decay and its Effect on Disposal and Utilization (ed. Grossbard, E.), pp. 321322. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Smith, T., Broster, W. H., Broster, V. J. & Siviter, J. W. (1981). The effects of grinding, either with or without NaOH treatment, on the utilization of straw by yearling dairy cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T., Broster, V. J. & Hill, R. E. (1980). A comparison of sources of supplementary nitrogen for young cattle receiving fibre-rich diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 687695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods Applied toExperiments in Agriculture and Biology (5th edition). Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D. (1976). Energy supply from the digestive tract of cattle. In Principles of Cattle Production (ed. Swan, H. and Broster, W. H.), pp. 121143. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Tagari, H., Dror, Y., Ascarelli, I. & Bondi, A. (1964). The influence of level of protein and starch in rations of sheep on the utilization of protein. British Journal of Nutrition 18, 333356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Es, A. J. H. (1976). Factors influencing the efficiency of energy utilization by beef and dairy cattle. In Principles of Cattle Production (ed. Swan, H. and Broster, W. H.), pp. 237253. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Wood, R. S. (1974). Straw production and disposal in Oxfordshire. Report on Straw Utilization Conference, pp. 14. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food.Google Scholar