Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:39:21.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An analysis of the factors determining yields in crosses between semi-dwarf and taller wheat varieties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. G. H. Lupton ,
R. H. Oliver  and
P. Ruckenbauer
F. G. H. Lupton
Affiliation:
The Plant Breeding Institute, Moris Lane, Trumpington, Cambridge
R. H. Oliver
Affiliation:
The Plant Breeding Institute, Moris Lane, Trumpington, Cambridge
P. Ruckenbauer
Affiliation:
Institut für Pflanzenzuchtung, Hochschule für Bodenkultur, 33 Gregor Mendelstrasse, 1180 Vienna, Austria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The growth and development of two semi-dwarf winter wheat varieties, of two taller varieties, and of random selections from two crosses between semi-dwarf and taller varieties were compared over 2 years. Changes with time of crop dry weight/m2, leaf area index and ear size were expressed as orthogonal polynomial regression coefficients. Significant correlations were obtained between yield, the polynomial coefficients and growth measurements relating to number of tillers and flag leaf area duration, but many of these variables were significantly correlated with each other. Multiple regression equations were therefore calculated expressing yield in terms of the variables. These showed flag leaf area duration and rate of ear growth to be the most important characters determining crop yield. The greatest reduction in total yield variance was obtained by the simultaneous consideration of characters relating to photosynthetic capacity and ear development. The significance of this finding in relation to the relative importance of ‘apos;source’ and ‘sink’ in determining grain yield are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 82 , Issue 3 , June 1974 , pp. 483 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bingham, J. (1972). Physiological objectives in breeding for grain yield in wheat. Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of Eucarpia, Cambridge 1971, pp. 15–29.Google Scholar
Borlaug, N. E. (1969). Wheat breeding and its impact on world food supply. In Proceedings of the Third International Wheat Genetics Symposium (ed. Findlay, K. W. and Shepherd, K. W.), pp. 1–36. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Borojevic, S. (1968). Characteristics of some new dwarf and serai dwarf wheat lines. Euphytica 17 Suppl., 143–51.Google Scholar
Briggle, L. W.Vogel, O. A. (1968). Breeding disease resistant short stature wheats in the United States. Euphytica 17 Suppl., 107–30.Google Scholar
Fiddian, W. E. H. (1964). Winter wheat varieties completing primary trials, 1961–63. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 10, 27–50.Google Scholar
Fiddian, W. E. H. (1971). Wheat, barley and oat varieties completing primary trials in 1971. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 12, 358–84.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. E. (1973). Developmental morphology of the inflorescence in hexaploid wheat cultivars with and without the cultivar Norin 10 in their ancestry. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 53, 7–15.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. & Yates, F. (1963). Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research, 6th ed.Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Gale, M. D. & Marshall, G. A. (1973). Insensitivity to gibberellin in dwarf wheats. Annals of Botany 37, 729–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, D. P. (1973). Inflorescence development of semi dwarf and standard height wheat cultivars in different photoperiod and nitrogen treatments. Canadian Journal of Botany 51, 941–56.Google Scholar
Large, E. C. (1954). Growth stages in cereals. Illustration of the Feekes scale. Plant Pathology 3, 128–9.Google Scholar
Lupton, F. G. H. (1972). Further experiments on photosynthesis and translocation in wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 71, 69–79.Google Scholar
Lupton, F. G. H., Ali, M. A. M. & Subramaniam, S. (1967). Varietal differences in growth parameters of wheat and their importance in determining yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 69, 111–23.Google Scholar
Lupton, F. G. H., Oliver, R. H., Ellis, F. B., Barnes, B. T., Howse, K. R., Welbank, P. J. & Taylor, P. J. (1974). Root and shoot growth of semi-dwarf and taller winter wheats. Annals of Applied Biology 77 (in Press).Google Scholar
Paquet, J. (1968). Effects of a selection for semi dwarfness on the other characteristics of bread wheat (autumn sown). Euphytica 17 Suppl., 131–42.Google Scholar
Radley, M. (1970). Comparison of endogenous gibberellins and response to applied gibberellin of some tall and dwarf wheat cultivars. Planta (Berlin) 92, 292–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Subbiah, R. V., Katyal, J. C., Narisinham, R. L. & Dakshinamirti, C. (1968). Preliminary investigations on root distribution of high yielding wheat varieties. International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 19, 385–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaminatham, M. S. (1968). India's success with dwarf wheats. Span, London 11, 138–42.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. N. (1965). Photosynthesis of ears and flag leaves of wheat and barley. Annals of Botany 29, 317–29.Google Scholar
Walton, P. D. (1972). Factor analysis of yield in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop Science 12, 731–3.Google Scholar