Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T23:28:12.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adaptation of the ovine ruminal flora to biuret

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. H. E. Schröder  and
F. M. C. Gilchrist
H. H. E. Schröder
Affiliation:
Research Department, African Explosives and Chemical Industries Ltd., Northrand, Transvaal, South Africa
F. M. C. Gilchrist
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Institute, Onderstepoort
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The adaptation of the ruminal flora of sheep to the hydrolysis of biuret has been successfully demonstrated. Bi-weekly measurements of biuretolytic activity of ruminal ingesta were made before, during and after the supplementation of biuret to poor, medium and high-quality rations. Generally no activity was found prior to biuret feeding, but an almost immediate response to biuret feeding occurred which increased progressively with the number of days the animals were fed biuret. The time required to reach maximum activity on very low, medium and somewhat higher protein diets were found to be 15, 30 and 70 days approximately. The supplementation with starch in addition to biuret was found to increase biuretolytic activity. Since neither protein nor starch was found to have any direct effect on biuretolytic activity in vitro, a change in numbers of biuretolytic organisms in the ingesta is discussed as a likely mechanism for the adaptation and de-adaptation of the ruminal flora. A stoichiometric conversion of biuret-N to NH3-N by active ingesta was demonstrated in vitro but was not reflected by the nitrogen levels in vivo. The activity of the ingesta was greatly reduced by straining.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , January 1969 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, G. C., McLaren, G. A., Campbell, C. D. & Smith, G. S. (1959). Comparative effects of urea, uramite, biuret, soybean protein, and creatine on digestion and nitrogen metabolism in lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 18, 134–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belasco, I. J. (1954). New nitrogen feed compounds for ruminants—a laboratory evaluation. J. Anim. Sci. 13, 601–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, W. T. Jr., Riggs, J. K. & Kunkel, H. O. (1956). The lack of toxicity of biuret to animals. J. Anim. Sci. 15, 225–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, T. C., Loosli, J K., Warner, R. G. & Tasaki, I. (1963). Utilization of biuret by ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 22, 139–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R., Barrett, E. L. & Kellerman, J. H. (1963). A comparison between nitrogen retention from biuret and urea by sheep on a low roughage diet. Jl S. Afr. vet. med. Ass. 34, 419–23.Google Scholar
Clark, R., Barrett, E. L. & Kellerman, J. H. (1965). A comparison between nitrogen retention from urea, biuret, triuret and cyanuric acid by sheep on a low protein roughage diot. Jl S. Afr. vet. med. Ass. 36, 79–80.Google Scholar
Ewan, R. C., Hatfield, E. E. & Garrigus, U. S. (1958). The effect of certain inoculations on the utilization of urea or biuret by growing lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 17, 298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaither, W., Garrigus, U. S., Forbes, R. M. & Hatfield, E. E. (1955). Biuret as a source of nonprotein nitrogen for sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 14, 1203.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, F. M. C. & Kistner, A. (1962). Bacteria of the ovine rumen. I. The composition of the population on a diet of poor teff hay. J. ogric. Sci., Camb. 59, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilchrist, F. M. C., Potgieter, E. & Voss, J. B. N. (1968). The biuretolytic activity of the ruminal flora of sheep fed practical rations containing biuret. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 70, 157–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouws, L. & Kistner, A. (1965). Bacteria of the ovine rumen. IV. Effect of change of diet on the predominant type of cellulose-digesting bacteria. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 64, 51–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, R. S. & Clark, R. (1964). The excretion of biuret in the urine of sheep fed biuret. Onderstepoort J. vet. Res. 31, 91–5.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E. E., Garrigus, U. S., Forbes, R. M., Neumann, A. L. & Gaither, W. (1959). Biuret— a source of NPN for ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 18, 1208–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. R. & McClure, K. E. (1963). In vitro and in vivo studies on the adaptation of sheep to biuret. J. Anim. Sci. 22, 1123.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. R. & McClure, K. E. (1964). In vitro and in vivo comparisons on the utilization of urea, biuret and diammonium phosphate by sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 208–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karr, M. R., Garrigus, U. S., Hatfield, E. E., Norton, H. W. & Doane, B. B. (1965). Nutritional and chemical evaluation of urea and of biuret in complete ensiled finishing diets by lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 24, 469–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKenzie, H. I. & Altona, R. E. (1964a). Biuret as a supplement to roughage rations for sheep and cattle. Jl S. Afr. vet. med. Ass. 35, 301–6.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, H. I. & Altona, R. E. (1964b). Observations on a biuret-containing lick as a nitrogen supplement to low quality roughage. Jl S. Afr. vet. med. Ass. 35, 309–12.Google Scholar
McLaren, A. (1964). Symposium on microbial digestion in ruminants: Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 577–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, G. A., Anderson, G. C., Welch, J. A., Campbell, C. D. & Smith, G. S. (1959). Diethylstilbestrol and length of preliminary period in the utilization of crude biuret and urea by lambs. I. Digestion and nitrogen retention. J. Anim. Sci. 18, 1319–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, G. A., Anderson, G. C., Welch, J. A., Campbell, C. D. & Smith, G. S. (1960). Diethylstilbestrol and length of preliminary period in the utilization of crude biuret and urea by lambs. II. Various aspects of nitrogen metabolism. J. Anim. Sci. 19, 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiske, J. C., Van Arsdell, W. J., Luecke, R. W. & Hoefer, J. A. (1955). The utilization of urea and biuret as sources of nitrogen for growing-fattening lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 13, 941–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, R. M. & Smith, J. A. B. (1943). The utilization of urea in the bovine rumen. I. Methods of analysis of the rumen ingesta and preliminary experiments in vivo. Biochem. J. 37, 142–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaadt, H. Jr, Johnson, R. R. & McClure, K. E. (1964). Nitrogen digestibility and excretion patterns during adaptation to urea, biuret and DAP by sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 891.Google Scholar
Schwartz, H. M., Schoeman, C. A. & Färber, M. S. (1964). Utilization of urea by sheep. I. Rates of breakdown of urea and carbohydrates in vivo and in vitro. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 63, 289–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, J. A., Anderson, G. C., McLaren, A. H., Campbell, C. D. & Smith, G. S. (1967). Time, diethylstilbestrol and vitamin B12 in the adaptation of lambs to NPN utilization. J. Anim. Sci. 16, 1034.Google Scholar