Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:59:01.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Yield and plant population in sugar beet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. L. Engledow
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge;
C. A. Maher
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge;
J. Hunter Smith
Affiliation:
Hertfordshire Institute of Agriculture;
H. Rhys Williams
Affiliation:
Hertfordshire Institute of Agriculture;
H. Fail
Affiliation:
Norfolk Agricultural Station.
F. Rayns
Affiliation:
Norfolk Agricultural Station.

Extract

Three years of subsidised sugar-beet growing in England has made clear the chief agricultural features of the crop. Many of our soils suit it well; the climate is favourable; it fits satisfactorily into some of our typical rotations. With the 1928 crop will come into operation the first of the subsidy reductions. The consequential change in standard price per ton of beet—46s. instead of 54s. as in 1925–7—has aroused anxious interest in the likelihood that the crop will outlive the subsidy. What price the factories will be able to offer on termination of the subsidy is not yet known. It will, of course, be decided by world-prices of sugar. Values between 30s. and 35s. per ton have been tentatively suggested. It has been claimed, further, that any price which covers cost of production will make the crop an asset to English agriculture because of the benefit to following crops. Whatever the strength of this claim farmers are and will continue to be anxiously concerned about net monetary return per acre. Now this return is governed by three factors—cost of growing, yield per acre, and price per ton. Costs of growing are not likely to alter substantially. Price per ton is considerably influenced by sugar content. The factories have devoted much effort to routine sampling and testing of deliveries but have not convinced farmers that their ascertainments are reliable. It may well be doubted whether any workable factory testing can be devised to ensure accuracy to 1 per cent, of sugar content.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

(1)Engledow, F. L. (1926). A Census of an Acre of Corn (by sampling). J. Agric. Sci. 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2) (1926). A Census of an Acre of Barley. J. Boy. Agric. Soc. 87.Google Scholar
(3)Hunter Smith, J. and Williams, Rhys H. (08. 1927). A Census of an Acre of Roots. J. Min. Agric. 34.Google Scholar
(4)Engledow, P. L. (1928). Investigations on Yield in the Cereals. IV. The Action of the Seed Drill. J. Agric. Sci. 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Doughty, L. R. and Engledow, F. L. (1928). Investigations on Yield in the Cereals. V. A Study of Four Wheat Fields: the Limiting Effect of Populationdensity on Yield and an Analytical Comparison of Yields. J. Agric. Sci. 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar