Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:53:33.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Yield and fertilizer N recommendations in winter wheat – an alternative approach in high rainfall areas of the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2012

E. M. WHITE*
Affiliation:
AFBI Crossnacreevy, Applied Plant Science and Biometrics Division, Plant Testing Station, Crossnacreevy, Belfast BT6 9SH, UK

Summary

The requirement for inorganic fertilizer nitrogen (N) by winter wheat crops in the United Kingdom is derived using the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) Fertilizer Manual. In the experimental programme described and discussed in the present paper, the appropriateness of these recommendations for winter wheat grown in Northern Ireland is examined.

Yield response to N varied in experiments conducted on two winter wheat cultivars (cvars) in Northern Ireland from 2007 to 2009. Consequently the optimum N rate (Nopt, defined as the rate of applied N where the value of the increase in yield equals the cost of the increment in fertilizer applied and beyond which additional N would not repay its cost) also varied from year to year. The band of fertilizer N rates over which margins were reduced by £20 (GBP) and £50 also varied from year to year. Changes in the N:grain price ratio affected Nopt to differing extents in the three experiments depending on the shape of the yield v. N response.

Nopt should therefore be considered as a range of N rates because (1) it varies from year to year and probably also field to field and (2) the margin of income from grain over cost of fertilizer varies little over a range of N rates because of the shape of the asymptotic response of yield to N. Alternatively, in high rainfall areas (annual rainfall >700 mm) of England, Wales and Northern Ireland, where Table C of the Fertilizer Manual (formerly RB 209) is used to determine soil nitrogen supply (SNS) index, a single N rate could be adopted at SNS indices of 2 or less (equating to soil N supplies of 100 kg/ha or less). A rate of 240 kg N/ha could be adopted based on the over-years function fitted to all results in the three experiments reported in the present paper and including treatments that vary in the splitting of N applied between the two applications and in their timing.

Grain N concentration rarely exceeded the guideline 19 mg/g for feed wheat crops identified in the Fertilizer Manual (Anon. 2010). Overall, N taken up by the crops was used efficiently, and particularly so at lower N rates. However, at low fertilizer N rates the contribution from ‘free’ soil N inflates the ‘apparent’ value of grain yield produced. The responses of yield and grain N concentration to N show that crop processes work to maximize yield at the expense of N concentration in the grain. Therefore there is less need to be concerned about identifying the optimum N rate and predicting fertilizer N requirement with a high degree of precision. Instead growers could assess and adjust the efficiency of their N use based on grain N concentration generally, rather than specifically assess whether their fertilizer N applications were close to Nopt. Essentially as grain N concentration increases, yield/kg of applied fertilizer N decreases. Thus at low grain N concentrations, yield could be increased by increasing N applications and at high grain N concentrations yield could be maintained and profitability increased by reducing N applications.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

ANON. (2000). Fertiliser Recommendations for Agricultural and Horticultural Crops (RB 209), 7th edn. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
ANON. (2009). Nitrogen for Winter Wheat – Management Guidelines. Stoneleigh, UK: AHDB-HGCA.Google Scholar
ANON. (2010). Fertiliser Manual (RB 209), 8th edn.London, UK: HMSO.Google Scholar
ANON. (2011 a). UK Mapped Climate Averages. Exeter, UK: The Met Office. Available online at http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/averages/ukmapavge.html (verified 4 April 2012).Google Scholar
ANON. (2011 b). N Ireland 1971–2000 Averages. Exeter, UK: The Met Office. Available online at: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/averages/19712000/areal/n_ireland.html (verified 4 April 2012).Google Scholar
ANON. (2011 c). HGCA Recommended Lists 2011/12 for Cereals and Oilseeds. Stoneleigh, UK: AHDB-HGCA. Available online at: http://www.hgca.com/content.output/5929/5929/Varieties/HGCA%20Recommended%20Lists/RL%20Archive%202011-12.mspx (verified 4 April 2012).Google Scholar
ANON. (2011 d). UK Cereal and Oilseed Rape Recommended List Trial Protocols. Stoneleigh, UK: AHDB-HGCA. Available online at: http://www.hgca.com/content.output/238/262/group/subgroup/Recommended%20list%20protocols.mspx (verified 4 April 2012).Google Scholar
AOAC (2000). Official Methods of Analysis. 17th edn. Arlington, VA: AOAC.Google Scholar
Easson, D. L. (1995). A Dataset for Validating the Rothamsted Model of the Soil Nitrogen Supply to Cereals. Home-grown Cereals Authority Project Report 114. Stoneleigh, UK: AHDB-HGCA.Google Scholar
Kindred, D. R. & Sylvester-Bradley, R. (2010). Routes to reducing the N requirements of high yielding wheat. Aspects of Applied Biology 105, 97106.Google Scholar
Orson, J. H. (2010). Nitrogen recommendations for UK cereal crops: a review. Aspects of Applied Biology 105, 6572.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R., Dampney, P. M. R. & Murray, A. W. A. (1984). The response of winter wheat to nitrogen. In The Nitrogen Requirement of Cereals (Eds Needham, P., Archer, J. R., Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Goodlass, G.), pp. 151174. ADAS/MAFF Reference Book 385. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R., Wiltshire, J. J. J., Kindred, D. R., Hatley, D. L. J. & Wilson, J. (2007). Detecting Soil Nitrogen Supplies by Canopy Sensing – Proof of Concept. HGCA Project Report 427. Stoneleigh, UK: AHDB-HGCA.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R., Kindred, D. R., Blake, J., Dyer, C. J. & Sinclair, A. H. (2008). Optimising Fertiliser Nitrogen for Modern Wheat and Barley Crops. HGCA Project Report No. 438. Stoneleigh, UK: AHDB-HGCA.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Clarke, S. (2009). Using Grain N% as a Signature for Good N Use. HGCA Project Report No. 458. Stoneleigh, UK: AHDB-HGCA.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Kindred, D. R. (2009). Analysing nitrogen responses of cereals to prioritize routes to the improvement of nitrogen use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 19391951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, E. M. (2012). The effects of variety, season and site on variation in grain N concentration and N use efficiency of winter wheat in Northern Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 150, 461474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar