Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:38:17.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Varietal differences in wheat in resistance to germination in the ear and α-amylase content of the grain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. Bingham
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge
E. T. Whitmore
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge

Extract

1. Three varieties of wheat with white grain and eleven with red grain were examined for a-amylase content of the grain and for resistance to germination in the ear when harvest was delayed.

2. There were large differences between varieties in a-amylase activity. These were due partly to differences in susceptibility to germination in the ear, which always resulted in increased a-amylase activity. There were also large differences between varieties in the a-amylase content of grain which had no visible indication of germination. These differences were not related to susceptibility to germination and were confirmed by a glass-house experiment in which the ears were always dry from emergence to harvest.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Belderok, B. (1961). Proc. Int. Seed Testing Ass. 26, 697760.Google Scholar
Bingham, J. (1962). Soc. Chem. and Ind. Monograph, no. 16, pp. 3454.Google Scholar
Farrand, E. A. (1964). Cereal Chem. 41, 98111.Google Scholar
Greer, E. N. & Hutchinson, J. B. (1945). Nature, Lond., 155, 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute of Agricultural Botany (1964). Farmers leaflet no. 8, Winter Wheat.Google Scholar
Spillane, P. A. (1959). Milling and Baking Quality of Irish Wheat. Dublin: Inst. Industr. Res. Standards.Google Scholar
Stewart, B. A. (1964). Nature., Lond, 204, 1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellington, P. S. & Durham, V. M. (1961). Ann. Bot. (N.S.), 25, 185–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar