Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T10:43:46.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Varietal differences in the nutritive value of cereal grains for pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. F. Fuller
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksbum, Aberdeen AB2 9SB, UK
A. Cadenhead
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksbum, Aberdeen AB2 9SB, UK
D. S. Brown
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksbum, Aberdeen AB2 9SB, UK
A. C. Brewer
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksbum, Aberdeen AB2 9SB, UK
M. Carver
Affiliation:
Nickerson RPB, Rothwell, Lines., UK
R. Robinson
Affiliation:
Nickerson RPB, Rothwell, Lines., UK

Summary

Estimates were made of the dry matter (DM) yield and N content of cereal grains harvested from trial plots. They included 236 combinations of variety and treatment, with 13 varieties of winter wheat grown under six husbandry regimes, 14 varieties of spring barley under three husbandry regimes and ten varieties of winter barley under 11 husbandry regimes. The husbandry included timing and rate of fertilizer application, use of growth regulator and fungicide, and seed rate.

For all three cereals, there were highly significant positive associations between grain N content (g/kg DM) and grain DM yield (t/ha) when individual varieties were grown under different conditions. The regression coefficients were: winter wheat 2·28, spring barley 0·74 and winter barley 1·06. When varieties were compared under constant husbandry, the association between N content and yield was negative; the regression coefficients were: winter wheat – 1·53, spring barley –1·14 and winter barley –1·21.

The contents of lysine, threonine, isoleucine and valine were examined in 19 samples of winter wheat, 19 of spring barley and 21 of winter barley. Each cereal type included a comparison of varieties under one husbandry regime and a comparison of husbandry regimes in one variety.

The amino acid composition of wheat protein changed little with either variety or treatment. In spring and winter barley, lysine concentration in grain protein (g/16 g N) decreased with increases in grain N which arose from additional fertilizer N. There were similar decreases in threonine, isoleucine and valine in winter barley, but varietal differences in grain N were not associated with significant changes in the amino acid composition of grain protein.

The nutritive values of spring barley, winter barley and winter wheat were compared in digestion and N balance studies in growing pigs. A subset often samples was examined which included, for each cereal type, high- and low-protein varieties, each (except for spring barley) grown with high or low rates of applied fertilizer N.

Apparent digestibility of dry matter measured at the terminal ileum was similar (0·67–0·70) in all three types of cereal but there was a tendency for the DM of high-protein varieties to be digested better than that of low-protein varieties. Over the whole digestive tract, the apparent digestibility of the DM of wheat was higher (0·83) than that of barley (0·75).

The apparent digestion of the starch of all samples was virtually complete (0·98) by the end of the ileum; the remainder was digested in the large intestine.

The apparent digestibility of N up to the terminal ileum was significantly higher for wheat than for barley, and significantly higher in high- than in low-protein varieties. Over the whole gastro-intestinal tract, the difference between the cereals was even larger; a greater proportion of wheat N than of barley N was digested in the large intestine.

The rate of N fertilizer application did not significantly affect the apparent digestibility of any amino acid but there were significant differences amongst the cereal types in the apparent digestibility of seven amino acids. The amino acids in high-protein varieties were, on average, 6 % more digestible than those in low-protein varieties.

When allowance was made for the endogenous flow of amino acids, some of the differences between cereals and between high- and low-protein varieties disappeared but some significant differences remained.

The biological value (BV) of wheat protein (0·43) was significantly lower than that of barley protein (mean 0·57). When pigs were fed wheat as the sole protein source, the higher N content of wheat compensated for its lower BV. There were no significant differences in the rates of N retention between pigs fed on wheat or barley.

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, A. J. (1977). Effects of fertilizers on barley protein quantity and quality. Cereal Research Communications 5, 159167.Google Scholar
Andersen, D. M., Sauer, W. C., Jorgensen, H. & Thacker, P. A. (1984). The total and digestible yield of nutrients in barley cultivars grown in the Peace River area of Alberta fed to growing swine. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64, 479485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, C. R. & Robson, R. (1976). Bioenergetic considerations in cereal breeding for protein improvement. Science 194, 14181421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bright, S. W. J., Norbury, P. B. & Miflin, B. J. (1980). Isolation and characterization of barley mutants resistant to aminoethylcysteine and lysine plus threonine. In Plant Cell Cultures: Results and Perspectives (Eds Sala, F., Parisi, B., Cella, R. & Cifferi, O.), pp. 179182. Amsterdam: North Holland Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, J., Mathieson, J. & Boyne, A. W. (1970). The use of automation in determining nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method, with final calculations by computer. Analyst 95, 181193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eggum, B. O. (1970). Über die Abhängigkeit der Proteinqualität vom Stickstoffgehalt der Gerste. Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie, Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde 26, 671.Google Scholar
Fowden, L. (1979). From fertilizer nitrogen to grain protein: constraints and opportunities. In Scottish Plant Breeding Institute Annual Report, 1978–1979, pp. 159168.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. F., Livingstone, R. M., Baird, B. A. & Atkinson, T. (1979). The amino acid supplementation of barley for the growing pig. 1. Response of nitrogen metabolism to progressive supplementation. British Journal of Nutrition 41, 321331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage fibre analysis. Agricultural Handbook No. 379, Washington, DC: ARS/USDA.Google Scholar
Ivan, M., Farrell, D. J. & Edey, T. N. (1975). Nutritional evaluation of wheat. 3. Effects of supplementation with lysine, threonine and methionine of diets based on wheat containing 13% crude protein on the performance of pigs. Animal Production. 20, 267276.Google Scholar
Jones, A. S.Cadenhead, A. & Livingstone, R. M. S. (1968). Variation in the composition of barley and its effect on the performance of pigs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 19, 446448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, A., Fernandez, J. A. & JØrgensen, H. (1983a). The net energy value of diets for growth in pigs in relation to the fermentative processes in the digestive tract and the site of absorption of the nutrients. Livestock Production Science 10, 171186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, A., Fernandez, J. A. & Jorgensen, H. (1983 b). Elucidation of causes of variations in the feed value of barley for pigs. Beretning fra Statens Husdyrbrugsforsog 543.Google Scholar
Just, A., Jørgensen, H. & Fernandez, J. A. (1983c). Feed value of spring barley, winter barley and winter wheat for pigs and the influence of type of soil and nitrogen fertilisation on the feed value. Beretning fra Statens Husdyrbrugsforsog 546.Google Scholar
Kirkman, M. A., Shewry, P. R. & Miflin, B. J. (1982). The effect of nitrogen nutrition on the lysine content and protein composition of barley seeds. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 33, 115127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, A., Eggum, B. O., Mortensen, A. P., Larsen, A. E. & Viuf, B. T. (1974). The relationship between dietary levels of protein, lysine, methionine, threonine, tryptophan and the performance of rats and bacon pigs fed two barley varieties grown at different levels of nitrogen. Yearbook, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 5577.Google Scholar
MacCrae, J. C. & Armstrong, D. G. (1968). Enzyme method for determination of α-linked glucose polymers in biological materials. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 19, 578581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGeown, P. & Maguire, M. F. (1967). Relationship between crude protein content and amino acid composition of Irish barleys. Irish Journal of Agriculture 6, 221227.Google Scholar
Mathieson, J. (1970). The automated estimation of chromic oxide. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 29, 30 A.Google Scholar
Miflin, B. J. (1978). Energy considerations in nitrogen metabolism. In Carbohydrate and Protein Synthesis (Eds Miflin, B. J. & Zoschke, M.), pp. 1331. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Miflin, B. J. (1980). Nitrogen metabolism and amino acid biosynthesis in crop plants. In The Biology of Crop Productivity (Ed. Carlson, P. S.), pp. 255296. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. (1963). On the determination of cystine as cysteic acid. Journal of Biological Chemistry 238, 235237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosse, J. & Baudet, J. (1977). Relation entre la composition en acides amines basiques et la teneur en azote des graines d'orge. In Proceedings of the 16th European Brewing Congress, pp. 2734. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Pushman, F. & Bingham, J. (1976). The effects of a granular nitrogen fertilizer and a foliar spray of urea on the yield and bread-making quality of ten winter wheats. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 281292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, A. P. & Jenkins, G. (1975). The effect of varying nitrogen supply on the protein composition of a high lysine mutant of barley. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 26, 705709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, A. P. & Mathers, J. C. (1974). Varietal differences in the amino acid composition of barley grain during development and under varying nitrogen supply. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 25, 963972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauer, W. C., Kennelly, J. J., Aherne, F. X. & Cichan, R. M. (1981). Availability of amino acids in barley and wheat for growing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 61, 793802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, W. C., Stothers, S. C. & Phillips, G. D. (1977). Apparent availabilities of amino acids in corn, wheat and barley for growing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 87, 585597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shewry, P. R., Field, J. M., Kirkman, M. A. & Miflin, B. J. (1980). The extraction, solubility and characterization of two groups of barley storage proteins. Journal of Experimental Botany 121, 393407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shewry, P. R., Kirkman, M. A., Pratt, H. M. & Miflin, B. J. (1978). Storage protein formation in normal and high lysine barley. In Carbohydrate and Protein Synthesis (Eds Miflin, B. J. & Zoschke, M.), pp. 155170. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Thomke, S. (1970). Uber die Veränderung des Aminosäuregehaltes der Gerste mit steigendem Stickstoffgehalt. Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie, Tierernährung und Fultermittelkunde 27, 2331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomke, S. (1972). Über den Futterwert von Gerste für Mastschweine. Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie, Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde 29, 132165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trinder, P. (1969). Determination of glucose in blood, using glucose oxidase with an alternative oxygen acceptor. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry 6, 2427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodham, A. A. (1973). The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the amino acid composition and nutritive value of cereals. Qualitas Plantarum 23, 281291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodham, A. A., Savic, S. & Hepburn, W. R. (1972). Evaluation of barley as a source of protein for chickens. 1. Variety and nitrogen application in relation to protein content and amino acid composition of the feed. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 23, 10451054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zebrowska, T. (1973). Digestion and absorption of nitrogenous compounds in the large intestine of pigs. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych B95–3, 8690.Google Scholar