Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:07:21.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sucrose metabolism in the subtending leaf to cotton boll at different fruiting branch nodes and the relationship to boll weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2013

J. LIU ,
Y. WANG ,
J. CHEN ,
F. LV ,
Y. MA ,
Y. MENG ,
B. CHEN  and
Z. ZHOU
J. LIU
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
Y. WANG
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
J. CHEN
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
F. LV
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
Y. MA
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
Y. MENG
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
B. CHEN
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
Z. ZHOU*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Changes of sucrose metabolism in the subtending leaf to cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) boll at different fruiting branch nodes (FBN) were investigated. Two cotton cultivars, Kemian 1 and Sumian 15, were grown in the field at three planting dates in 2009 and 2011. Cotton planted on different dates but experiencing similar climatic factors flowered on the same date and had similar boll opening dates, but had different FBN. In the present study, boll weight and carbohydrate content were significantly affected by both flowering date (FD) and FBN. However, only cystolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (cy-FBPase) and sucrose-phosphate synthase (SPS) activities of the sucrose-metabolizing enzymes were influenced significantly by FBN, and the influence of FBN was lower with delayed FD. In general, effects of FBN on boll weight and sucrose metabolism in the subtending leaf were higher at the optimal FD (13 August) than those at later FD (9 September 2009 and 2 September 2011), and total fruiting branches were used to characterize cotton physiological age in the current study. Sucrose transport capacity (Tn) and SPS in the subtending leaf had significantly positive correlations with boll weight at 17–24 days post anthesis (DPA), a crucial period when boll weight was significantly affected. In addition, higher SPS activity was favourable for sucrose export and boll weight during boll development.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 152 , Issue 5 , October 2014 , pp. 790 - 804
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashley, D. A. (1972). C-labelled photosynthate translocation and ultilization in cotton plant. Crop Science 12, 69–74.Google Scholar
Baxter, C. J., Foyer, C. H., Turner, J., Rolfe, S. A. & Quick, W. P. (2003). Elevated sucrose-phosphate synthase activity in transgenic tobacco sustains photosynthesis in older leaves and alters development. Journal of Experimental Botany 54, 1813–1820.Google Scholar
Boquet, D. J. & Clawson, E. L. (2009). Cotton planting date: yield, seedling survival, and plant growth. Agronomy Journal 101, 1123–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constable, G. A. & Rawson, H. M. (1980). Carbon production and utilization in cotton: inferences from a carbon budget. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 7, 539–553.Google Scholar
Daie, J. (1993). Cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase: a key enzyme in the sucrose biosynthetic pathway. Photosynthesis Research 38, 5–14.Google Scholar
Davidonis, G. H., Johnson, A. S., Landivar, J. A. & Fernandez, C. J. (2004). Cotton fiber quality is related to boll location and planting date. Agronomy Journal 96, 42–47.Google Scholar
Gandin, A., Lapointe, L. & Dizengremel, P. (2009). The alternative respiratory pathway allows sink to cope with changes in carbon availability in the sink-limited plant Erythronium americanum. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 4235–4248.Google Scholar
Gao, X. B., Wang, Y. H., Zhou, Z. G. & Oosterhuis, D. M. (2012). Response of cotton fiber quality to the carbohydrates in the leaf subtending the cotton boll. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 175, 152–160.Google Scholar
Gormus, O. & Yucel, C. (2002). Different planting date and potassium fertility effects on cotton yield and fiber properties in the Çukurova region, Turkey. Field Crop Research 78, 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, X. X. & Zeng, W. (1989). Study on the relationship between temperature and boll development in Xinjiang cotton area. Acta Agronomica Sinica 15, 202–212 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Guo, X. X., Zeng, W. & Su, Y. L. (1991). Photosynthate accumulation and export in cotton leaf and the relationship with night temperature and fiber debelopment. Acta Agronomica Sinica 17, 115–122 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Guy, C. L., Huber, J. L. A. & Huber, S. C. (1992). Sucrose phosphate synthase and sucrose accumulation at low temperature. Plant Physiology 100, 502–508.Google Scholar
Haigler, C. H., Singh, B., Zhang, D., Hwang, S., Wu, C., Cai, W. X., Hozain, M., Kang, W., Kiedaisch, B., Strauss, R. E., Hequet, E. F., Wyatt, B. G., Jividen, G. M. & Holaday, A. S. (2007). Transgenic cotton over-producing spinach sucrose phosphate synthase showed enhanced leaf sucrose synthesis and improved fiber quality under controlled environmental conditions. Plant Molecular Biology 63, 815–832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartmans, K. & Van Loon, C. (1987). Effect of physiological age on growth vigour of seed potatoes of two cultivars. I. Influence of storage period and temperature on sprouting characteristics. Potato Research 30, 397–409.Google Scholar
Hendrix, D. L. (1993). Rapid extraction and analysis of nonstructural carbohydrates in plant tissues. Crop Science 33, 1306–1311.Google Scholar
Hendrix, D. L. & Grange, R. I. (1991). Carbon partitioning and export from mature cotton leaves. Plant Physiology 95, 228–233.Google Scholar
Hendrix, D. L., Mauney, J. R., Kimball, B. A., Lewin, K., Nagy, J. & Hendrey, G. R. (1994). Influence of elevated CO2 and mild water stress on nonstructural carbohydrates in field-grown cotton tissues. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 70, 153–162.Google Scholar
Hu, M. Y., Zhang, Z. B. & Xu, P. (2008). Photoassimilate transport proteins and biology function in plant. Plant Physiology Communications 44, 1–6 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Huber, S. C. & Huber, J. L. (1992). Role of sucrose-phosphate synthase in sucrose metabolism in leaves. Plant Physiology 99, 1275–1278.Google Scholar
Huber, S. C. & Huber, J. L. (1996). Role and regulation sucrose phosphate synthase in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 47, 431–444.Google Scholar
Huber, S. C. & Israel, D. W. (1982). Biochemical basis for partitioning of photosynthetically fixed carbon between starch and sucrose in soybean (Glycine max Merr.) leaves. Plant Physiology 69, 691–696.Google Scholar
Huber, S. C., Wilson, R. F. & Burton, J. W. (1983). Studies on genetic male-sterile soybeans : II. Effect of nodulation on photosynthesis and carbon partitioning in leaves. Plant Physiology 73, 713–717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huner, N. P. A., Öquist, G., Hurry, V. M., Krol, M., Falk, S. & Griffith, M. (1993). Photosynthesis, photoinhibition and low temperature acclimation in cold tolerant plants. Photosynthesis Research 37, 19–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jang, H. K., Lee, S. W., Lee, Y. H. & Hahn, T. R. (2003). Purification and characterization of a recombinant pea cytoplasmic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase. Protein Expression and Purification 28, 42–48.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. J. & Nilsen, J. (2004). Influence of low growth temperatures on physiological age of seed potatoes. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Soil and Plant Science 54, 185–188.Google Scholar
Kalt-Torres, W., Kerr, P. S., Usuda, H. & Huber, S. C. (1987). Diurnal changes in maize leaf photosynthesis : I. Carbon exchange rate, assimilate export rate, and enzyme activities. Plant Physiology 83, 283–288.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. J. (2006). Photosynthesis. carbon metabolism: in and beyond the chloroplast. In Thirty Years of Photosynthesis 1974–2004 (Eds Kelly, G. J. & Latzko, E.), pp. 302–329. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Li, C. R., Liang, Y. H. & Hew, C. S. (2002). Responses of Rubisco and sucrose-metabolizing enzymes to different CO2 in a C3 tropical epiphytic orchid Oncidium Goldiana. Plant Science 163, 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liakatas, A., Roussopoulos, D. & Whittington, W. J. (1998). Controlled-temperature effects on cotton yield and fiber properties. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 130, 463–471.Google Scholar
Liu, X., Jiang, C. M., Zheng, Z. R., Zhou, Z. N., He, M. R. & Wang, Z. L. (2005). Activities of the enzymes involved in starch synthesis and starch accumulation in grains of wheat cultivars GC8901 and SN1391. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 38, 897–903 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Lunn, J. E. & Hatch, M. D. (1995). Primary partitioning and storage of photosynthate in sucrose and starch in leaves of C4 plants. Planta 197, 385–391.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Y., Tamoi, M. & Shigeoka, S. (2001). Overexpression of a cyanobacterial fructose-1,6-/sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase in tobacco enhances photosynthesis and growth. Nature Biotechnology 19, 965–969.Google Scholar
Neuhaus, H. E., Quick, W. P., Siegl, G. & Stitt, M. (1990). Control of photosynthate partitioning in spinach leaves. Planta 181, 583–592.Google Scholar
Peng, S. & Krieg, D. R. (1991). Single leaf and canopy photosynthesis response to plant age in cotton. Agronomy Journal 83, 704–708.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, W. T. & Turley, R. B. (1998). Variation in photosynthetic components among photosynthetically diverse cotton genotypes. Photosynthesis Research 56, 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rufty, T. W. Jr & Huber, S. C. (1983). Changes in starch formation and activities of sucrose phosphate synthase and cytoplasmic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase in response to source-sink alterations. Plant Physiology 72, 474–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seifter, S., Dayton, S., Novic, B. & Muntwyler, E. (1950). The estimation of glycogen with the anthrone reagent. Archives of Biochemistry 25, 191–200.Google ScholarPubMed
Shan, S. H., Shi, P., Sun, X. Z., Zhou, Z. G. & Bian, D. C. (2002). Effect of anthesis date and fruiting branches on cotton fiber qualities and super-molecular structure. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 35, 163–168 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Sharkey, T. D., Savitch, L. V. & Butz, N. D. (1991). Photometric method for routine determination of kcat and carbamylation of Rubisco. Photosynthesis Research 28, 41–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shu, H. M. (2009). Mechanism on genotypic differences in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fiber strength formation. PhD thesis, Nanjing Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Stitt, M. (1989). Control analysis of photosynthetic sucrose synthesis: assignment of elasticity coefficients and flux-control coefficients to the cytosolic fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase and sucrose phosphate synthase. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences 323, 327–338.Google Scholar
Stitt, M. & Heldt, H. W. (1981). Simultaneous synthesis and degradation of starch in spinach chloroplasts in the light. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Bioenergetics 638, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, X. L., He, Z. P. & Wang, B. M. (2000). Boll development and yield components of Bt cotton CCRI30 influenced by flowering date. Acta Gossipii Sinica 12, 306–309 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Van Heerden, P. D. R., Viljoen, M. M., De Villiers, M. F. & Krüger, G. H. J. (2004). Limitation of photosynthetic carbon metabolism by dark chilling in temperate and tropical soybean genotypes. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 42, 117–124.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. H., Chen, B. L., Bian, H. Y., Jiang, G. H., Zhang, W. J., Hu, H. B., Shu, H. M. & Zhou, Z. G. (2006). Synergistic effect of temperature and cotton physiological age on fibre development. Acta Agronomica Sinica 32, 1671–1677 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Wang, Y. H., Shu, H. M., Chen, B. L., McGiffen, M. jr, Zhang, W. J., Xu, N. Y. & Zhou, Z. G. (2009). The rate of cellulose increase is highly related to cotton fibre strength and is significantly determined by its genetic background and boll period temperature. Plant Growth Regulation 57, 203–209.Google Scholar
Weeden, N. F. & Buchanan, B. B. (1983). Leaf cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase: a potential target site in low temperature stress. Plant Physiology 72, 259–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wullschleger, S. D. & Oosterhuis, D. M. (1990). Photosynthetic carbon production and use by developing cotton leaves and bolls. Crop Science 30, 1259–1264.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. Z., Zhou, Z. G. & Xu, X. (1994). Effect of cotton physiological age on quality of seeds and fiber. Shanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4, 1–3 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Zentgraf, U., Jobst, J., Kolb, D. & Rentsch, D. (2004). Senescence-related gene expression profiles of rosette leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana: leaf age versus plant age. Plant Biology 6, 178–183.Google Scholar
Zhao, D. & Oosterhuis, D. M. (2000). Dynamics of non-structural carbohydrates in developing leaves, bracts and floral buds of cotton. Environmental and Experimental Botany 43, 185–195.Google Scholar
Zhao, W. Q., Meng, Y. L., Chen, B. L., Wang, Y. H., Li, W. F. & Zhou, Z. G. (2011). Effects of fruiting-branch position, temperature-light factors and nitrogen rates on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fiber strength formation. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 44, 3721–3732 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhao, X. H., Wang, Y. H., Shu, H. M. & Zhou, Z. G. (2010). Effect of plant physiological age on biomass and nitrogen accumulation in cotton boll. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 43, 4605–4613 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhou, K. J., Guo, W. Y., Huang, Q. P., Sun, W. D. & Wu, S. L. (1998). Study on effect of different flowering date on economic characters and fibre quality of cotton. Cotton Science 10, 244–248 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar