Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:11:25.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A study of the habits of zebu cattle in Tanganyika

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. G. Hutchison
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Station, Mpwapwa, Tanganyika
R. Woof
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Station, Mpwapwa, Tanganyika
R. M. Mabon
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Station, Mpwapwa, Tanganyika
I. Salehe
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Station, Mpwapwa, Tanganyika
J. M. Robb
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Station, Mpwapwa, Tanganyika

Extract

1. The habits of five Tanganyika Shorthorn zebus and their suckling calves were studied during periods of 72 consecutive hours at monthly intervals in each of the first 6 months of the calves' lives, during the ‘dry’ season of the year.

2. Cows grazed for 7·16 hr. per day while grass was green and plentiful, but, as grazing became dry and sparse, they ate silage at night for up to 3 hr., and reduced their grazing time by about 2 hr. The ratio of rumination time to eating time tended to increase as grazing became drier and as silage eating increased. The average ratio was 1·01 to 1.

3. All calves were actively grazing for 4·0 hr. per day by the second month, and for 5·6 hr. per day by the fifth month. They ate silage diffidently in the second month, but they were eating silage for 1·7 hr. per night at 6 months. Rumination was observed in a calf at 18 days of age, but was consistently observed in the second month when calves ruminated for 6·1 hr. per day. The ratio of rumination time to grazing time for calves declined from 1·5 to 1 in the second month to 1·1 to 1 in the fifth month. Rumination time among calves was more closely related to silage eating than to grazing time.

4. The calves acted as individuals in the first month, and thereafter their eating habits were determined more by their dam than by their age. Day-time rumination pattern was a characteristic of the age of calf, but night-time rumination by calves was more closely correlated to that of their dams.

5. Calves suckled for an average period of 9·2 min. per suckle. There was very little variation with age, but frequency of suckles decreased from 9·5 times per day at 1 month to 5·6 times per day at 6 months. The fastest-growing calf suckled less frequently for shorter periods, suggesting readier availabilty of more milk.

6. Suckling intensity was evenly spread over the 24 hr. during the first 2 months, but thereafter suckling became increasingly confined to nighttime while the cattle were yarded.

7. It was concluded that artificial feeding divided into three equal feeds per day at 05.00, 13.00 and 21.00 hr. for the first 2 months, followed by two equal feeds per day at 05.00 and 18.00 hr., would be reasonably consistent with natural suckling activities if restrictive feeding has to be applied. But further work is required to determine the cost, in terms of reduced efficiency of milk utilization, incurred by concentration of intake to restricted feeding times.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, D. L. (1960). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 28, 44.Google Scholar
Brownlee, A. (1950). Bull. Anim. Behav. no. 8, p. 11.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E. & Halley, R. J. (1953). Brit. J. Anim. Behav. 1, 139.Google Scholar
Chambers, D. T. (1959). J. Agric. Sci. 53, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, J. L. (1953). Brit. J. Anim. Behav. 1, 67.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. (1950). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 28, 249.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harker, K. W., Taylor, J. I. & Rollinson, D. H. L. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 193.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. P. & Beid, D. (1951). J. Agric. Sci. 41, 350.Google Scholar
Lambkin, K. & Lampkin, G. H. (1960). J. Agric. Sci. 55, 233.Google Scholar
Lampkin, G. H., Quartermain, J. & Kidner, M. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 50, 211.Google Scholar
McArthur, A. T. G. (1951). Proc. N. A. Soc. Anim. Prod. 11, 87.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B., Shillam, K. W. G. & Palmer, J. (1955). J. Dairy Res. 22, 252.Google Scholar