Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:49:40.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of the fasting metabolism of various breeds of hog: III. Metabolism and surface area measurements.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Thomas Deighton
Thomas Deighton
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

From metabolism experiments carried out on the pigs enumerated in the first paper of this series the following conclusions are drawn:

(a) The metabolism in a state of inanition appears to be more a function of a power of the weight than of the true surface area as determined by the photographic method.

(b) Hogs born in the summer and autumn of one year appear to show two maxima of metabolism; one almost immediately, as has been observed previously, and another during the following summer, provisionally ascribed to the effect of light on thyroid activity, produced by the intermediary action of the anterior pituitary.

(c) Actual, and theoretically computed average growths are shown to agree remarkably well in the case of eleven of the pigs which were treated in an exactly similar manner. Individual growth curves showed no such agreement. This is considered to strengthen the evidence for the writer's previously stated view that nett energy is a statistical rather than a physiological constant.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , July 1937 , pp. 317 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Deighton, T.J. agric. Sci. (1934), 24, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Deighton, T.J. agric. Sci. (1935), 25, 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Deighton, T.J. agric. Sci. (1932), 22, 418.Google Scholar
(4)Hogan, A. G. & Skouby, C. I.J. agric. Res. (1923), 25, 419.Google Scholar
(5)Cowgill, G. R. & Drabkin, D. L.Amer. J. Physiol. (1927), 81, 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Deighton, T.Proc. roy. Soc. (1923), B, 95, 340.Google Scholar
(7)Deighton, T.J. agric. Sci. (1929), 19, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Burton, A. C.J. Nutrit. (1934), 7, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Borra, E.Arch. Fisiol. (1930), 28, 490.Google Scholar
(10)Benedict, F. G.J. biol. Chem. (1915), 20, 263, and in many subsequent publications.Google Scholar
(11)Kleiber, M.Hilgardia (1932), 6, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Kestner, O.Pflüg. Arch. ges. Physiol. (1934), 234, 290.Google Scholar
(13)Hill, M. & Parkes, A. S.Proc. roy. Soc. (1933), B, 113, 537.Google Scholar
(14)Marshall, F. H. A. & Bowden, F. P.J. exp. Biol. (1934), 11, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Loeb, L. & Friedman, H.Proc. Soc. exp. Biol, N.Y. (1931), 29, 14.Google Scholar
(16)Janssen, S. & Loeser, A.Arch. exp. Path. Pharm. (1931), 163, 516.Google Scholar
(17)Hertz, S. & Kraues, A.Endocrinology (1934), 18, 435.Google Scholar
(18)Kendall, E. C. & Simonsen, D. G.J. biol. Chem. (1928), 80, 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(19)Dawbarn, M.Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. (1929), 6, 65 (cit.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20)Cruickshank, E. M.Biochem. J. (1929), 23, 1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(21)Hosker, A. J.exp. Biol. (1936), 13, 344.Google Scholar
(22)Riddle, et al. Yearb. Carneg. Instn (1934–1935), No. 34, pp. 53–4.Google Scholar
(23)Burton, A. C.J. Nutrit. (1934), 7, 527.Google Scholar
(24)Hammond, J.J. R. agric. Soc. (1932), 93, 131.Google Scholar
(25)Edin, H. & Helleday, T.Medd. No. 449 CentAnst. Försöksv. Jordbr., Stockh. (1935). Husdjuravdelningen No. 87.Google Scholar
(26)Wood, T. B.J. agric. Sci. (1926), 16, 425.Google Scholar
(27)Odriozola, M.Maiz, cebada y arroz en la ceba de cerdos. Institute de investigaciones agronómicas, Dirección general de agricultura, servicio de publicaciones agricolas. Madrid, 1935.Google Scholar
(28)Mitchell, H. et al. J. agric. Res. (1927), 34, 927.Google Scholar
(29)Mitchell, H.J. agric. Res. (1932), 45, 163.Google Scholar
(30)Forbes, E. B.Science (1933), 77, 306.Google Scholar
(31)Forbes, E. B.Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Production (1932), p. 32.Google Scholar
(32)Forbes, E. B.J. agric. Res. (1933), 46, 753.Google Scholar