Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:02:03.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on the metabolism of the ruminant by indirect calorimetry. III. The influence of work on the energy exchange of the goat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. E. Magee
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen.

Extract

Two objectives were in view in undertaking this research.; to ascertain the cost in energy of muscular work in the goat and to investigate the adaptability of the Douglas-Haldane method of indirect calorimetry to work experiments on this animal. It is to the results of human experiments chiefly, that the present position of the physiology of muscular exercise is due which owes comparatively little to experiments on other animals. Zuntz and his school (1) have, however, compared the effect of a fixed amount of work on men, horses and dogs, and Lusk (2) has carried out some investigations into the influence of work on the dog. The principal obstacle hitherto in the way of employing animals other than man for work investigations has been the want of a sufficiently adaptable technique. Zuntz's experiments on the horse were conducted by means of a tracheal cannula, a device that, though fairly adaptable for work experiments, is not always desirable. Lusk's experiments were carried out in his respiration calorimeter where the applicability was very limited. Boothby and Sandiford(3) and Kunde(4) have carried out metabolic investigations on dogs by means of the Benedict apparatus, but here again the device is only of limited value for work experiments, which none of these workers have apparently yet undertaken. It was believed therefore that, if the proposed experiments were a success, in addition to possessing a certain physiological value, they would open up a wide field of research of great practical significance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Zuntz, , Frentzel, and Reach, . Cited by Lusk, Science of Nutrition, p. 326, 1919.Google Scholar
(2)Lusk, . Science of Nutrition p. 312.Google Scholar
(3)Boothby, and Sandiford, . Amer. Journ. Physiol. 66, 1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Kunde, . Amer. Journ. Physiol. 59, 448.Google Scholar
(5)Orr, and Magee, . Journ. Agric. Sci. 13, 1923.Google Scholar
(6)Gephart, , Du Bois, and Lusk, . Journ. Biol. Chem. 27, 1916.Google Scholar
(7)Cathcart, , Lothian, and Greenwood, . Journ. of the R.A.M.C. 04, 1920.Google Scholar
(8)Cathoart, and Orr, . Energy Expenditure of Infantry Recruit. H.M. Stationery Office, p. 56, 1919.Google Scholar
(9)Krogh, and Lindhard, . Biochem. Journ. 14, 1920.Google Scholar
(10)Hill, and Lupton, . Quart. Journ. Med. 16, 1923.Google Scholar