Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:02:03.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the excretion of copper in the rabbit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. Eden
A. Eden
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Veterinary Laboratory, New Haw, Weybridge, Surrey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. In metabolism experiments undertaken to study the channels of elimination of copper under varying conditions, the rabbit was chosen as experimental animal for convenience of manipulation. This choice, although not defeating the main objects of the work, accidentally added valuable informationon the little-known habit of “physiological faecal refection”in this animal.

2. On a normal diet of bran and oats, containing the usual traces of copper, the rabbit is in copper equilibrium, excreting as much in faeces and urine as is taken in the food. Urinary elimination is of the order of 0·07–0·38 mg. per litre, but this is very subsidiary to faecal elimination of about 2·5 mg. per 100 g. of dry matter, which may account for even more than 96 % of the total food copper.

3. Increase of food copper is not reflected by material increase of urinary output, the higher quantities appearing almost entirely in the faeces. Of 50 mg. of copper or nearly 200 times the normal food intake, as the dissolved sulphate dried on to the food, only 0·1 mg. appeared in the urine, the remainder being slowly excreted in the faeces over the unexpectedly long period of 4 or 5 weeks.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , January 1941 , pp. 145 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cunningham, I. J. (1931). Biochem. J. 25, 1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eden, A. (1940a). J. camp. Path. 53, 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eden, A. (1940 b). Nature, Lond., 145, 36.Google Scholar
Eden, A.Green, H. H. (1939). J. comp. Path. 52, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindow, C. W., Peterson, W. H. & Steenbock, H. (1929). J. biol. Chem. 84, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, H. (1939). Nature, Lond., 143, 981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitch, I. M. (1933). J. biol. Chem. 100, 479.Google Scholar
Ross, A. & Rabinowitch, I. M. (1935). J. biol. Chem. 111, 803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E. L. (1939). Nature, Lond., 143, 981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E. L. (1940). Vet. Rec. 52, 259.Google Scholar
Tompsett, S. L. (1934). Biochem. J. 28, 2088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar