Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:45:40.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the adaptability of three breeds of sheep to a tropical environment modified by altitude V. The annual fluctuation in breeding ability of rams maintained on Rhodesian highveld

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. B. Symington
R. B. Symington
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Rhodesia and Nyasaland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Semen characteristics and libido were observed for 34 months in German Merino, Persian Blackhead and indigenous ‘Native’ rams maintained on Rhodesian highveld. Birth rate from controlled service was determined during 23 of these months.

1. Breeding ability, as judged by semen production and libido, was continuous in all rams. A fluctuation in birth rate from controlled service was due more likely to seasonal variation in female fertility than in seminal fertilizing capacity.

2. Monthly changes occurred in all seminal characteristics but only those in sperm concentration were consistent between years. In all breeds spermatogenic activity was high in spring and mid-summer, low in late summer and autumn.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , April 1961 , pp. 165 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. (1945). The Semen of Animals and its Use in Artificial Insemination. Edinburgh: Imp.Bureau Anim. Genetics.Google Scholar
Brochart, M. & Debatene, D. (1953). Anim. Breed. Abstr. 21, 329.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. C., Dott, H. M. & Glover, T. D. (1956). J. Agric. Sci. 48, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, M. C. (1945). J. Agric. Sci. 35, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmens, C. W. (1959). Fertility in the mule; Chap. 22. In Progress in the Physiology of Farm Animals. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Frank, A. H. (1952). Artificial insemination in livestock breeding. U.S.D.A. Circ. no. 567.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. M. C., Sanders, R. N. & Granger, W. (1942). C.S.I.R.O., Aust. Bull. no. 148.Google Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. (1951). Nature, Lond., 167, 777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E., Badreldin, A. L. & Darwish, Y. H. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, J. A. (1955). Fertility and Infertility in Domestic Animals. London: Baillière.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. T., Squiers, C. D., Bogart, R. & Oloufa, M. M. (1951). J. Anim. Sci. 10, 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, F. F., Miller, K. C. & Baugess, L. G. (1938). Cited Anderson (1945).Google Scholar
Sapsford, C. P. (1951). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2, 331, 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starke, N. C. (1949). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 22, 415.Google Scholar
Symington, R. B. (1959). Proc. Henderson Res. Sta. Sci. Soc. S. Rhodesia.Google Scholar
Symington, R. B. (1960 a). Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Symington, R. B. (1960 b). J. Agric. Sci. 55, 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, A. (1945). Technique of Artificial Insemination. London: Holborn Surgical Instrument Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Webster, W. M. (1952). Anim. Breed. Astr. 20, 241.Google Scholar
Wiggins, E. L., Terrell, C. E. & Emik, O. L. (1953). J. Anim. Sci. 12, 684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, L. M. (1954). Animal Breeding. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar