Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:15:07.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on carotene in relation to animal nutrition1: Part I. The technique of carotene estimation in feeding stuffs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. A. Seshan  and
K. C. Sen
P. A. Seshan
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Section, Imperial Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, India
K. C. Sen
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Section, Imperial Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A modified method of estimating the carotene content of plant material has been described in detail. The modifications include a combined aqueous and alcoholic potash hydrolysis of the original material before extraction is carried out.

A statistical analysis and a recovery test have shown this method to be relatively more efficient than methods similar to those described by other workers.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 1942 , pp. 194 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

De, N. K. (1936). Indian J. med. Res. 23, 511.Google Scholar
Ferguson, W. S. (1935). Analyst, 60, 680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, W. S. & Bishop, G. (1936). Analyst, 61, 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilbert, H. R. (1934). Industr. Engng Chem., Anal, ed., 6, 452.Google Scholar
Guilbert, H. R. (1937). J. Nutrit. 13, 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegsted, D. M., Poster, J. W. & Peterson, W. H. (1939). Industr. Engng Chem., Anal, ed., 11, 256.Google Scholar
Kon, S. K. & Thompson, S. Y. (1940). J. agric. Sci. 30, 622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, F. E. (1939). J. agric. Sci. 29, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petering, H. G., Wolman, W. & Hibbard, R. P. (1940). Industr. Engng Chem., Anal, ed., 12, 148.Google Scholar
Peterson, W. H., Hughes, J. S. & Freeman, H. F. (1937). Industr. Engng Chem., Anal, ed., 9, 71.Google Scholar
Pyke, M. (1936). J. Soc. chem. Ind. 55, 139.Google Scholar
Russell, T. W., Taylor, M. W. & Chichester, D. F. (1935). Plant Physiol. 10, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaber, W. M. (1940). Analyst, 65, 266.Google Scholar
Sen, K. C. & Seshan, P. A. (1938). Indian J. vet. Sci. 8, 169.Google Scholar
Willstätter, R. & Stoll, A. (1913). Untersuchungen über Chlorophyll. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, H. E. C., Gupta, S. M. D. & Ahmed, B. (1937). Indian J. med. Res. 24, 807.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, W. F. (1939). Private communication.Google Scholar