Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:57:35.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies of grazing behaviour in relation to grassland management: III. Rotational compared with continuous grazing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

John Hancock
Affiliation:
Ruakura Animal Research Station, Department of Agriculture, Hamilton, New Zealand
C. P. McMeekan
Affiliation:
Ruakura Animal Research Station, Department of Agriculture, Hamilton, New Zealand

Extract

1. A series of observations on the grazing behaviour of identical twin cattle on two contrasting systems of pasture management—rotationally and continuously grazed—is described.

2. The rotationally grazed cows averaged only 11 min. (day/cow) shorter feeding time and 18 min. shorter ruminating time than their continuously grazed co-twins. The total time they spent in work was thus 29 min. shorter.

3. While the average differences in total work over the whole trial was not great, the continuously grazed cows worked for appreciably longer daily periods at the time of seasonal feed shortage during which time the rotationally grazed cows were buffered by their pasture diet being supplemented with silage.

4. The differences in grazing behaviour between the cows of the two treatments, together with the magnitude of the seasonal variations which occurred in both groups, indicated that dairy cows attempt to maintain a stable production in the face of adverse pasture conditions by increasing their feeding time.

5. Previous conclusions based on observations of uniformly treated twins regarding the importance of heredity in the determination of grazing behaviour were fully confirmed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hancock, J. (1950). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A, 32 (4), 22.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. (in the Press).Google Scholar