Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:23:19.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Statistical research on the digestibility in the cow. II. Nitrogen and ether extract

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Paquay ,
R. de Baere  and
A. Lousse
R. Paquay
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cureghem, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
R. de Baere
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cureghem, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
A. Lousse
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cureghem, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The results obtained for nitrogen and ether extract digestibility with 116 different rations fed to 242 non-pregnant dry cows and 96 lactating cows were studied.

A hyperbolic relation exists between nitrogen digestibility (Y) and crude protein content (X), with the equation:

Y = 88·6–(301/X)(r = – 0·928**, RSD = 4·78).

Digestible protein content ( Y) is linearly related to crude protein content(X):

Y = 0·90X-3·10 (r = 0·982**, RSD = 0·823).

From dry-matter intake and crude protein content it is possible to estimate accurately the amount of digestible nitrogen. With all the experimental rations the mean metabolic faecal nitrogen was 496 mg/100 g of ingested dry matter, and the true nitrogen digestibility was conspicuously constant up to 90%.

Digestibility of ether extract depends on the nature of the feeds. When the concentrate percentage of the ration is high, the digestibility of ether extract obeys the same laws as that of nitrogen.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , February 1972 , pp. 141 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arroyo-Aguilu, J. A. & Rivera-Brenes, L. (1965). Relationship between the percentage of crude protein and apparently digestible protein in some forages of Puerto Rico. J. Agric. Univ. Rico 49, 145–8.Google Scholar
Colburn, M. W., Evans, J. L. & Ramage, C. H. (1968). Apparent and true digestibility of forage nutrients by ruminant animals. J. Dairy Sci. 51, 1450–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deijs, W. B. & Harberts, C. L. (1966). Lipid fractions in feed and faeces and their apparent digestibility in cattle. Jaarb. Inst. biol. scheik. Onderz. LandbGewass. 79–89.Google Scholar
Demarquilly, C. & Jarrige, R. (1964). Valeur alimentaire de l'herbe des prairies temporaires aux stades d'exploitation pour le pâturage. I. Composition chimique et digestibilité. Annls Zootech. 13, 301–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, R. C. & Topps, J. H. (1963). Studies of protein requirements of ruminants. 2. Protein requirements for maintenance of three breeds of cattle. Br. J. Nutr. 17, 549–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garton, G. A. (1969). Digestion and absorption of lipids in the ruminant. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 28, 131–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glover, J., Duthie, D. W. & French, M. H. (1957). The apparent digestibility of crude protein by the ruminant. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 48, 373–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, G. E., Paar, G. E. & Little, J. A. (1964). Composition, intake, digestibility and prediction of digestibility of coastal Bermudagrass hays. J. Dairy Sci. 47, 865–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J. P. & Weston, R. H. (1968). Digestion of protein in the intestines of the sheep. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 7, 364–8.Google Scholar
Holter, J. A. & Reid, J. T. (1959). Relationship between the concentration of crude protein and apparently digestible protein in forages. J. Anim. Sci. 18, 1339–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, J. B. (1962). Studies on the nutritive value of New Zealand dairy pastures. II. Herbage intake and digestibility studies with dry cattle. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 5, 409–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jentsch, W., Hoffmann, L., Schiemann, R. & Hoffmann, B. (1969). Ergebnisse vergleichender Untersuchungen Über die Verdaulichkeit von Rationen bei Rind und Schaf unter besonderer Berücksichtigung pansenphysiologischer Parameter. Arch. Tierernähr. 19, 531–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lousse, A. (1959). Contribution expérimentale a l'établissement des bases physiologiques du rationnement azoté des bovins. C. r. Reck. Inst. Encour. Reck, scient. Ind. Agric., no. 21.Google Scholar
McC. Graham, N. (1969). The net energy value of artificially dried subterranean clover harvested before flowering. Aust. J. agric. Res. 20, 365–73.Google Scholar
Paquay, R. (1968). Les réserves azotées chez les bovins et les facteurs alimentaires qui les influencent. Thesis, Université de Louvain.Google Scholar
Paquay, R., de Baere, R. & Lousse, A. (1966). Recherches statistiques sur la digestibilité des éléments de la ration. Annls Méd. vét. 110, 13–55.Google Scholar
Paquay, R., de Baere, R. & Lousse, A. (1972). Statistical research on the digestibility in the cow. I. Dry matter and energy. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 78, 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, M. A. & Lepartulo, L. (1965). Losses during storage and digestibility of different crops as silage. Agron. J. 57, 425–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Storry, J. E. & Nicholson, J. W. G. (1970). The digestion of fatty acids in the stomach and intestines of sheep given, widely different rations. J. Dairy Res. 37, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Niekerk, B. D. H., Smith, D. W. W. Q. & Oosthtuysen, D. (1967). The relationship between the crude protein content of South African feeds and its apparent digestion by ruminants. Proc. S. Afr. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6, 108–16.Google Scholar
Ward, G. M. & Morrill, J. L. (1966). Digestibility and nitrogen utilization of rolled and moist-heat-treated sorghum grain. J. Dairy Sci. 49, 332–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, R., Johnston, M. J. & Armstrong, D. G. (1964). The evaluation of artificially dried grass as a source of energy for sheep. 1. The effect of stage of maturity on the apparent digestibility of rye-grass, cocksfoot and timothy. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 62, 391–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar