Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:37:55.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The statistical basis of selection in animal husbandry. II. Studies on life performance of brood sows: the judging of brood sows by their number of offspring born and reared in the earliest litters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. M. Olbrycht
Affiliation:
The Gallon Laboratory, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts

Extract

To study the total-life performance of all the 156 sows, they were divided into groups consisting of sows having produced 73 to 77, 78 to 82, 83 to 87, … pigs throughout their breeding life often litters. The frequency distribution, of total number of offspring born, thus obtained is shown in Fig. 2.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bartram, H. A. (1926). Züchtungskunde, 1, 256–69.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P. (1941). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 9, 236–17.Google Scholar
Elltnger, T. (1921). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash., 7, 134–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1937). The Design of Experiments. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1941). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1914). J. Agric. Sci. 6, 263–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. (1941). Biol. Rev. 16, 165–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haring, F. & Hagen, H. (1939). Kühn-Arch. 52, 121–35.Google Scholar
Hodgson, R. E. & Clark, R. T. (1934). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 27, 212–14.Google Scholar
Hofmann, F. (1939). Z. Schweinez. 46, 299300.Google Scholar
Hopkins, J. A. (1928). Bull. la Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 255.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. (1929). Z. Tien. ZüchtBiol. 15, 4986.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. (1931). Pig Breed. Ann. 11, 80–7.Google Scholar
Keith, T. B. (1930). J. Agric. Res. 41, 593600.Google Scholar
King, F. G. (1926). Poland China J. 17, 4.Google Scholar
Krallinger, H. F. & Gruhn, R. (1938). Landw. Jb. 85, 828–67.Google Scholar
Krallinoer, H. F. & Schott, A. (1934). Züchtungskunde, 9, 175–9.Google Scholar
Křiženecký, J. (1935). Sbornik, 10, 140–54.Google Scholar
Křiženecký, J. (1936). Zur Analyse der ‘Fruchtbarkeit’ als Nutzeigenschaft des Schweines.—Neue Forschungen in Tierzucht. Bern: Verbandsdr.Google Scholar
Křiženbcký, J. (1937). Sbornik, 12, 229–35.Google Scholar
Kudrjavzev, P. N. (1934). Zuchtungskunde, 9, 444–52.Google Scholar
Lush, J. L. (1937). Animal Breeding Plans. Ames, Iowa, U.S.A.: Collegiate Press.Google Scholar
Lush, J. L., Anderson, A. L., Culberton, C. C. & Hammond, W. E. (1933). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 26, 282–7.Google Scholar
Lush, L. J. & Molin, A. E. (1937). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 30, 133–7.Google Scholar
Lüthge, H. (1933). Züchtungskunde, 8, 333–44.Google Scholar
McPhee, H. C. (1931). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 24, 262–4.Google Scholar
Menzies-Kitchin, A. W. (1937 a). Farm Econ. 2,126–9.Google Scholar
Menzies-Kitchin, A. W. (1937 b). J. Agric. Sci. 27, 611–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, H. P. & Johnson, D. W. (1932). J. Agric. Res. 44, 511–21.Google Scholar
Olbrycht, T. M. (1941). Bull. Nat. Pig Breed. Ass. no.2.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. W. (1935). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 28, 222–35.Google Scholar
Smith Buchanan, A. D., Robinson, O. J. & Bryant, D. M. (1936). Bibliogr. genet. 12.Google Scholar
Smith, W. W. (1933). Pork Production. New York: Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
Walton, A. (1938). Folia morphol., Warszawa, 10, 270–80.Google Scholar
Winters, L. M. (1938). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 31, 278–84.Google Scholar
Zorn, W., Krallinger, H. F. & Schott, A. (1933). Züchtungskunde, 8, 433–50.Google Scholar