Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:48:35.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some effects of live weight and body condition on the milk production of Blackface ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. N. Peart
Affiliation:
The Hill Farming Research Organization, 29 Lauder Road, Edinburgh

Summary

Approximately 15 weeks before parturition, forty-eight pregnant Blackface ewes were divided into three similar groups. During the 15–6 weeks prepartum period the ewes were fed to increase the live weights and body condition scores of ewes in each of groups A and B and to decrease those of ewes in group C. At 6 weeks prepartum mean differences of approximately 11 kg live weight and two grades of body condition had been created. Food was rationed to the ewes in all groups per kg live weight based on their weights 6 weeks prepartum, to provide the theoretical requirements of Blackface ewes bearing twin lambs. All groups of ewes made similar live-weight gains in late pregnancy and the mean birth weights of the lambs were also similar. Blood plasma F.F.A. values confirmed that the ewes were similarly nourished in late pregnancy regardless of live weight or body condition. During lactation the ewes were fed 9·2 g D.O.M./kg based on their immediate post-partum live weights, plus an allowance for a predicted level of milk production. Ewes in groups A and C were fed 0·5 and ewes in group B, 0·25 g D.O.M. per g of predicted milk production. The ration was increased after the 1st and 2nd weeks of lactation, then maintained at a constant level for the remainder of lactation. Milk production of the ewes was measured using a lamb suckling technique during a 10-week lactation. The mean daily milk production of ewes in groups A and C were similar and the yield of each of these groups was substantially greater than that of group B ewes. The mean total milk production of ewes suckling twin lambs in groups A, B and C was 127, 108 and 142 kg respectively, and of ewes suckling single lambs 104, 81 and 91 kg respectively. The mean live-weight changes of ewes in groups A and C were similar during lactation. Except for group A ewes suckling single lambs, which maintained their mean live weight, all ewes lost weight in early lactation and consistent gains were not made until late lactation. Greatest live-weight loss occurred in group B ewes and extended further into lactation. Changes in body condition followed a similar course to live weight changes. The mean daily live-weight gain of twin lambs in groups A, B and C was 279, 275 and 284 g respectively, and of single lambs, 318, 300 and 319 g respectively. The evidence indicates that ewes in lean body condition have a higher efficiency of food conversion to milk and that in situations of continuous undernourishment a high state of body condition is undesirable during lactation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Babnicoat, C. R., Logan, A. G. & Grant, A. I. (1949). Milk secretion studies with New Zealand Romney ewes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 39, 4445, 237–48.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. & Wainman, F. W. (1956). Some observations on the digestiblity of food by sheep and on related problems. Br. J. Nutr. 10, 6991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coop, I. E. (1962). The energy requirements of sheep for maintenance and gain. I. Pen fed sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 58, 179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. W., Hogue, D. E. & Bensadoun, A. (1964). Body composition and growth of suckling lambs as affected by level of feed intake. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 943–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, N. McC. & Williams, A. J. (1962). The effects of pregnancy on the passage of food through the digestive tract of sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 13, 894900.Google Scholar
Hadjipieris, G., Jones, J. G. W., Wimble, R. H. & Holmes, W. (1966). Studies on feed intake and feed utilisation by ewes. II. The utilisation of feed by ewes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66, 341–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, B. C. (1961). Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasmanian J. Agric. 32, 1921.Google Scholar
McCance, I. (1959). The determination of milk yield in the Merino ewe. Aust. J. agric. Res. 10, 839–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N. (1967). The effect of different levels of nutrition during late pregnancy on the subsequent milk production of Blackface ewes and on the growth of their lambs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68, 365–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N. (1968). Lactation studies with Blackface ewes and their lambs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 70, 8794.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. & Reid, R. L. (1967). Energy requirements of the pregnant ewe. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68, 359–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A. M. & Thomson, W. (1949). Lambing in relation to the diet of the pregnant ewe. Br. J. Nutr. 2, 290305.Google Scholar
Underwood, E. J., Sheib, F. L. & Cariss, H. G. (1943). Studies in sheep husbandry in Western Australia. IV. The influence of a high level of prenatal feeding in lamb production. J. agric. West Aust. 20, 288–97.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948). The growth of lambs before and after birth in relation to the level of nutrition. J. agric Sci., Camb. 38, 93153, 243–302, 369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar