Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:31:39.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seed disinfection VI. Stripe smut of rye

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Eric Taylor  and
W. A. R. Dillon Weston
R. Eric Taylor
Affiliation:
Dip.Agric. (CANTAB), School of Agriculture, Cambridge
W. A. R. Dillon Weston
Affiliation:
Dip.Agric. (CANTAB), School of Agriculture, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The occurrence of stripe smut of rye, Urocystis occulta (Wallr.) Rab. in Great Britain is recorded.

2. Control of seed-borne infection by disinfecting seed prior to sowing with an approved organomercury seed disinfectant has been shown.

3. Experiments have confirmed that the disease may be soil-borne.

4. With the increase of the acreage of rye grown in Great Britain it is suggested that seed should be treated with an approved organo-mercury seed disinfectant as a preventive measure.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 1945 , pp. 116 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

Butler, E. J. (1918). Fungi and Disease in Plants. 547 pp. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink and Co.Google Scholar
Ciferri, R. (1931). Ann. mycol., Berl., 29, 8–13.Google Scholar
Fischer, G. W. (1942). Phytopathology, 32, 4–5.Google Scholar
Griffiths, M. G. (1924). J. Agric. Res. 27, 425–450.Google Scholar
Ling, L. (1941). Phytopathology, 31, 617–633.Google Scholar
MacAlpine, D. (1910). The Smuts of Australia, pp. 1–285. Melbourne, Viet.Google Scholar
Mundkur, B. B., Pal, B. P. & Bose, R. D. (1941). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 11. 687–94.Google Scholar
Neatby, K. (1943). In litt.Google Scholar
Rabenhorst, L. & Klotzoch, (1856). Herb. Viv. Myc. 2nd ed. p. 393.Google Scholar
Saccardo, P. A. (1888). Sylloge Fungorum, 7, 515.Google Scholar
Tisdale, W. H. & Tapke, V. F. (1927). Fmrs'.Bull. V.S. Dep. Agric. no. 1540, 16 pp.Google Scholar
Verwoerd, L. (1929). Sci. Bull. Dep. Agric. S. Afr. 76.Google Scholar
Vilkattis, V. (1934). Rep. PI. Prot. Sta. Dotnuva, 18 pp. (Cited in Rev. Appl. Mycol. 15, 644.)Google Scholar
Vrlkarns, V. (1936). Yearb. Agric. Acad. Dotnuva, 10, 131–41.Google Scholar
Volkart, A. (1939). Ber. schweiz. bot. Ges. 49, 495–503. (Cited in Rev. Appl. Mycol. 19, 12.)Google Scholar
Wallroth, F. W. (1833). Flora Cryptogamica Germaniae, 2, 212.Google Scholar
Weston, W. A. R. Dillon (1927). Ann. Appl. Biol. 14, 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, W. A. R. Dillon & Taylor, R. E. (1943). Nature, Lond., 152, 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, T. F.Hwang, L. & Tsiang, C. T. (1936). Bull. Chin. Bot. Soc. 2, 111–13. (Cited in Rev. Appl. Mycol. 16, 305.)Google Scholar