Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:11:50.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The rôle of aluminium in soil infertility and toxicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. Hardy
F. Hardy
Affiliation:
(Imperial College of Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad, British West Indies.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The main results of soil investigations on the rôle of aluminium in soil infertility are reviewed, with particular regard to the physicochemical principles involved.

2. Magistad's conclusion that soils or other nutrient media whose reaction values lie within the range pH 4·7 and pH 8·5 do not contain aluminium in soluble form, and are probably therefore not toxic to plants, is discussed in the light of modern knowledge of the properties of hydrous alumina and its peptisation phenomena.

3. Dialysis experiments which have led to this generalisation are criticised on the grounds that they do not take into account the disturbing effect of dialysis on hydrous colloidal systems, and that dialyser membranes do not simulate plant-cell membranes.

4. Aluminium may possibly penetrate plant-root cells, and, under certain conditions, may be translocated, within the plant body, in at least four different forms, namely, (a) simple ions, (b) more complex colloidal electrolytes, (c) co-ordinated complex anions, and (d) organo-compounds. These may conceivably be interconvertible.

5. Aluminium appears to exert true toxic effect only when presented to plant roots as simple ions, or as the more soluble colloidal electrolytes. Apparently, the degree of toxicity varies for different plant species.

6. The reaction conditions of nutrient media and of plant saps doubtless largely decide the form in which aluminium occurs therein. At reactions approaching the isoelectric point of hydrous alumina, toxic effects may never be exerted, although the assignation of a strict reaction-range applicable to all soils or nutrient media, and to all plant species, is probably inadmissible.

7. Non-toxic forms of aluminium may apparently accumulate under certain conditions at definite tissue regions of certain plants, and may disturb their metabolic processes, disposing the plants to certain diseases.

8. Within the reaction-range at which toxic aluminous solutes cannot exist in soils or other culture media, hydrogen-ions may exert controlling influence on plant growth, and may thus be of major significance in natural plant distribution, and in the behaviour of plants growing in normal agricultural soils.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1926 , pp. 616 - 631
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Hopkins, C. G., Knox, W. H. and Pettit, J. H. (1903). A quantitative method for determining the acidity of soils. U.S. Dept. Agric. Bur. Chem. Bul. 73, 114.Google Scholar
(2)Veitch, F. P. (1904). Comparison of methods for the estimation of soil acidity. Journ. Am. Chem. Soc. 24, 637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Abbott, J. B., Conner, S. D. and Smalley, H. R. (1913). Soil acidity, nitrification, and the toxicity of soluble salts of aluminium. Indiana Agric. Exp. Sta. Bul. 170.Google Scholar
(4)Daikuhara, G. (1914). Ueber saure Mineralböden. Bul. Imp. Centr. Agric. Exp. Sta. Japan, 2, 1.Google Scholar
(5)Rose, R. P. (1914). Einige reversible von Aluminium Hydroxid abstammende Hydrosole. Koll-Zeitsch. 15, 1.Google Scholar
(6)Ruprecht, W. R. (1915). Toxic effect of iron and aluminum salts on clover seedlings. Mass. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bul. 161.Google Scholar
(7)Ruprecht, R. W. and Morse, F. W. (1915). The effect of sulfate of ammonia on soil. Mass. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bul. 165.Google Scholar
(8)Miyake, K. (1916). The toxic action of soluble aluminum salts upon the growth of the rice plant. Journ. Biol. Chem. 25, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Rice, F. E. (1916). Studies in soil, I. Journ. Phys. Chem. 20, 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Blum, W. (1916). The determination of aluminium as oxide. Journ. Am. Chem. Soc. 38, 1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Gile, P. L. and Carrero, J. O. (1916). Assimilation of iron by rice from certain nutrient solutions. Journ. Agric. Res. 7, 503.Google Scholar
(12)Ruprecht, R. W. and Morse, F. W. (1917). The cause of the injurious effect of sulfate of ammonia when used as a fertilizer. Mass. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bul. 176.Google Scholar
(13)Stoklasa, J. et al. (1918). Ueber die Verbreitung des Aluminum-ions in der Pflanzenwelt. Bioch. Zeitsch. 88, 292.Google Scholar
(14)Hartwell, B. L. and Pember, F. R. (1918). The presence of aluminum as a reason for the difference in the effect of so-called acid soils on barley and rye. Soil Sci. 6, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Hartwell, B. L., Pember, F. R. and Howard, L. P. (1918). Lime requirements as determined by the plant and by the chemist. Soil Sci. 7, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16)Jones, H. W. (1920). The distribution of inorganic iron in plant and animal tissues. Bioch. Journ. 14, 654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(17)Knight, H. G. (1920). Acidity and acidimetry of soils, I. Studies of the Hopkins and Pettit method for determining soil acidity. Journ. Ind. Eng. Chem. 12, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18)Mirasol, J. J. (1920). Aluminum as a factor in soil acidity. Soil Sci. 10, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(19)Gile, P. L. and Carrero, J. O. (1920). Cause of lime-induced chlorosis and availability of iron in the soil. Journ. Agric. Res. 20, 33.Google Scholar
(20)Wherry, E. T. (1920). Soil acidity, its nature, measurement and relation to plant distribution. Smithsonian Inst. Rept. for 1920, 1922, p. 247.Google Scholar
(21)McCall, A. G. and Haag, J. R. (1921). The relation of the hydrogen-ion concentration of nutrient solutions to growth and chlorosis of wheat plants. Soil Sci. 12, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(22)Comber, N. M. (1921). Letter to Nature, Sept. 29, p. 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(23)Ames, J. W. (1921). The solvent action of nitrification and sulfofication. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta. Bul. 351.Google Scholar
(24)Conner, S. D. and Sears, O. H. (1922). Aluminum salts and acids at varying hydrogen-ion concentrations, in relation to plant growth in water cultures. Soil Sci. 13, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(25)Atkins, W. R. G. (1922). Some factors affecting the hydrogen ion concentration of the soil and its relation to plant distribution. Proc. Roy. Dubl. Soc. 16, No. XXX.Google Scholar
(26)Denison, I. A. (1922). The nature of certain aluminium salts in the soil and their influence on ammonification and nitrification. Soil Sci. 13, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(27)Arndt, C. K. (1922). The growth of field corn as affected by iron and aluminium salts in solution. Am. Journ. Bot. 9, 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(28)Greenfield, R. E. and Buswell, A. M. (1922). Investigation by means of the hydrogen electrode of the chemical reactions involved in water purification. Journ. Am. Chem. Soc. 44, 1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(29)Buswell, A. M. and Edwards, G. P. (1922). Some facts about residual alum in filtered water. Ch. Met. Eng. 26, 826.Google Scholar
(30)Comber, N. M. (1922). The availability of mineral plant food. Journ. Agric. Sci. 12, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(31)Sheppard, S. E. (1922). Gelatin in the photographic process. Journ. Ind. Eng. Chem. 14, 1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(32)Olsen, C. (1923). Studies on H-ion concentration of soils and its significance to vegetation, especially to the natural distribution of plants. Compt, rend. Lab. Carlsberg, 15, 1.Google Scholar
(33)Blair, A. W. and Prince, A. L. (1923). Studies on the toxic properties of soils. Soil Sci. 15, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(34)Burgess, P. S. (1923). A method for the determination of “active” aluminum in acid soils. Soil Sci. 15, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(35)Hoffer, G. N. and Carr, R. H. (1923). Accumulation of aluminum and iron compounds in corn plants and its probable relation to root rots. Journ. Agric. Res. 23, 801.Google Scholar
(36)Burgess, P. S. (1923). Active aluminum and hydrogen-ions in acid soils. Comparison of “active” aluminium and hydrogen-ion concentrations of widely separated acid soils. Soil Sci. 15, 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(37)Carr, R. H. and Brewer, P. H. (1923). Manganese, aluminium and iron ratio as related to soil toxicity. Journ. Ind. Eng. Chem. 15, 634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(38)Whiting, A. L. (1923). Inorganic substances, especially aluminum, in relation to the activities of soil organisms. Journ. Am. Soc. Agron. 15, 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(39)McCall, A. G. (1923). The influence of acidity itself on plant growth without regard to other factors. Journ. Am. Soc. Agron. 15, 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(40)Gils, P. L. (1923). Methods of diagnosing toxicity. Journ. Am. Soc. Agron. 15, 305.Google Scholar
(41)Marsh, R. P. (1923). Iron solubility tests in culture solutions at different pH values. New Jer. Agric. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rept. 44, for 1923 (1924), 252.Google Scholar
(42)Tottingham, W. E. and Rankin, E. J. (1923). The availability of iron in nutrient solutions for wheat. Ann. Journ. Bot. 10, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(43)Hatfield, W. D. (1924). Soluble aluminium and the haematoxylin test in filtered waters. Journ. Eng. Chem. 16, 233.Google Scholar
(44)Carr, R. and Havercamp, H. G. (1924). Modifications of plant growth and ash content as affected by acids added to the soil. Journ. Am. Soc. Agron. 16, 278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(45)Reed, H. S. and Haas, A. R. C. (1924). Iron supply in a nutrient medium. Bot. Gaz. 77, 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(46)McGeorge, W. T. (1924). Iron, aluminum and manganese in the soil solution of Hawaiian soil. Soil Sci. 18, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(47)Banerji, N. L. (1924). The influence of the H-ion concetration on the dose of alum, and the mechanism of the action of alum in the clarification of natural waters. Indian Med. Res. 11, 695.Google Scholar
(48)Sen, K. C. (1924). On the stability of colloidal solutions. Pt. I. Aluminum hydroxide suspension. Journ. Phys. Chem. 28, 1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(49)Salisbury, E. J. (1925). The incidence of species in relation to soil reaction. Journ. Ecol. 13, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(50)Marsh, R. P. and Shive, J. W. (1925). Adjustment of iron supply to the requirements of soy-bean in solution culture. Bot. Gaz. 79, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(51)Miller, L. B. (1925). The effect of anions upon the physical, chemical and colloidal properties of aluminium hydroxide. Colloid Sympos., Univ. Minnes. 3, 208.Google Scholar
(52)McGeorge, W. T. (1925). The influence of aluminum, manganese and iron salts upon the growth of sugar cane, and their relation to infertility of acid island soils. Exp. Sta. Hawaiian Sugar Planters’ Assoe. Bul. 49.Google Scholar
(53)Magistad, O. C. (1925). The aluminium content of the soil solution and its relation to soil reaction and to plant growth. Soil Sci. 20, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(54)Britton, H. T. S. (1925). Electrometric studies of the precipitation of hydroxides, Pt. I. Journ. Chem. Soc. Lond. 127, 2110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(55)Child, T. B., Roberts, E. and Turner, E. E. (1925). The alumino-oxalates of some active bases. Journ. Chem. Soc. Lond. 127, 2971.Google Scholar
(56)Michaelis, L. (1925). The Effects of Ions in Colloidal Systems. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
(57)Bassett, H. (1925). The Theory of Quantitative Analysis. Routledge, London. Chs. IV, XII, XIII.Google Scholar
(58)Hardy, F. (1926). Anomalous flocculation in colloidal clays and soils. Journ. Phys. Chem. 30, 254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar