Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:55:22.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Retention of energy and nitrogen by young sheep on different feeding patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. Freer ,
D. B. Jones  and
K. R. Christian
M. Freer
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Industry, CSIRO, Canberra, A.C.T.
D. B. Jones
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Industry, CSIRO, Canberra, A.C.T.
K. R. Christian
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Industry, CSIRO, Canberra, A.C.T.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In each of two experiments the comparative slaughter technique was used to compare the retention of energy by young Border Leicester × Merino wethers when the same total amount of food was offered according to two different feeding regimens. These were designed to simulate, in pens with a diet of pelleted lucerne, feeding patterns typical of continuous and intensive rotational grazing.

In the first experiment ten 9-month-old sheep that were offered the same amount of food daily (mean intake 367 g digestible organic matter) during each of 14 weeks made mean daily gains of 39 g live weight, 6·3 g body fat and 0·59 MJ (140 kcal) energy compared with a gain of 30 g live weight, a loss of 1·4 g body fat and a gain of 0·28 MJ (67 kcal) energy by a similar group that ate the same total quantity of food but in amounts that ranged, during each week, from 1·8 to 0·1 times the daily intake of the other group. This cyclic feeding pattern caused a small decrease in the digestibility of dietary organic matter.

In the second experiment two similar feeding patterns were compared with ten pairs of 3-month-old sheep eating twice as much food each week as in the first experiment. One member of each pair was, in each of 13 weeks, offered food ad lib. for 3 days and then amounts falling to 20% of voluntary intake on the seventh day; the other one ate the same amount of food each week but in seven almost equal feeds. The latter sheep gained, on average, 132 g live weight daily and retained 58 g body fat and 2·96 MJ (707 kcal) energy compared with 124 g live weight, 49 g body fat and 2·61 MJ (624 kcal) energy by the sheep on the cyclic feeding pattern. In neither experiment was wool growth affected by feeding pattern.

The greater effect of the cyclic feeding pattern in reducing the efficiency of energy retention in the first experiment is attributed to the higher number of days each week during which these animals were estimated to be in negative energy balance. These results suggest that adverse nutritional effects of a fluctuating feeding pattern in rotational grazing are likely to be most important where sheep are being rationed near their maintenance level and only small where food is ample.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , February 1972 , pp. 7 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Livestock. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Baich, C. C. (1950). Factors affecting the utilization of food by dairy cows. 1. The rate of passage of food through the digestive tract. Br. J. Nutr. 4, 361–88.Google Scholar
Birbell, H. A. & Bishop, A. H. (1970). The effect of feeding frequency of a roughage on wool production. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 8, 277–82.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. E. & Wheeler, J. L. (1963). Dyebanding: a technique for fleece growth studies. Aust. J. Sci. 26, 53–4.Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC. (1967). Effects of feeding frequency on energy and nitrogen balance in sheep given a ground and pelleted forage. Aust. J. agric. Res. 18, 467–84.Google Scholar
Keenan, D. M., McManus, W. R. & Freer, M. (1969). Changes in the body composition and efficiency of mature sheep during loss and regain of live weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72, 139–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, D. M., McManus, W. R. & Freer, M. (1970). Voluntary intake of food by mature sheep following restricted feeding. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 74, 477–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kley, F. K. Van Der (1956). A simple method for the accurate estimation of daily variations in the quality and quantity of herbage consumed by rotationally grazed cattle and sheep. Neth. J. agric. Sci. 4, 197–204.Google Scholar
McKinney, G. T., Axelsen, A. & Morley, F. H. W. (1970). The consumption of lucerne by sheep at pasture. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 8, 466–71.Google Scholar
Moir, R. J. (1961). A note on the relationship between the digestible dry matter and the digestible energy content of ruminant diets. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 1, 24–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paladines, O. L., Reid, J. T., Bensadoun, A. & Niekerk, R. D. H. Van (1964). Heat of combustion values of the protein and fat in the body and wool of sheep. J. Nutr. 82, 145–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, H. N., Haymast, R. H., Riches, J. H., Roberts, N. F. & Wilson, L. T. (1953). Physical definition of sheep and their fleece for breeding and husbandry studies. Divl Rep. Div. Anim. Health Prod. OSIRO, no. 4.Google Scholar
Wheeler, J. L. (1960). Field experiments on systems of management for mesophytic pastures. Divl Rep. Div. Pl. Ind. CSIRO, no. 20.Google Scholar
White, E. P., Thompson, F. B. & Brice, N. (1948). Application of the Dumas micromethod to pasture nitrogen analysis. Analyst 73, 146–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed