Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:18:13.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Results from experiments comparing aqueous and anhydrous ammonia with ‘nitro-chalk’ for grass cut for silage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. V. Widdowson ,
A. Penny  and
R. C. Flint
F. V. Widdowson
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
A. Penny
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
R. C. Flint
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In five experiments made at Rothamsted from 1966 to 1970 ‘Nitro-Chalk’ (ammonium nitrate–calcium carbonate mixture, 21% N) was broadcast for grass cut for silage, either in a single dose in spring or divided equally for three cuts. The ‘Nitro-Chalk’ was used to evaluate anhydrous ammonia (82% N) in 1966, anhydrous ammonia and aqueous ammonia (approximately 26% N) in 1967, 1968 and 1969, and anhydrous ammonia, aqueous ammonia and aqueous urea (18% N) in 1970. All these fertilizers were applied to give 125, 250, 375 and 500 kg N/ha, except in 1968 when 250, 375, 500 and 625 kg N/ha were given.

Anhydrous ammonia gave smaller yields (of dry matter) than the other N fertilizers except in 1968, a wet year, when it was at least as good as ‘Nitro-Chalk’, but slightly less good than aqueous ammonia. Yields were larger with autumn- than with springinjected aqueous ammonia and larger with either, than with equivalent single doses of ‘Nitro-Chalk’. Yields with aqueous ammonia were also larger than with ‘Nitro-Chalk’ divided equally for three cuts when more than 375 kg N/ha was tested, but smaller with less. Aqueous urea was as good as a single dose of ‘Nitro-Chalk’ but less good than divided ‘Nitro-Chalk’ in 1970, the only year it was tested. ‘Nitro-Chalk’ divided equally for three cuts gave larger yields than when a single dose of up to 375 kg N/ha was given, but with more N than this a single dose was better.

Apparent recovery of N was least from anhydrous ammonia and differed little between autumn and spring injection in 1968, the only year when a valid comparison was possible. Apparent recoveries of N from autumn and from spring-injected aqueous ammonia and from ‘Nitro-Chalk’ broadcast in a single dose differed little, nor did the proportion of the N recovered at each cut. Recovery from ‘Nitro-Chalk’ broadcast in three equal amounts was more uniform, but little larger.

Judged by yield, no more than 375 kg N/ha was justified; grass given this amount of N either as aqueous ammonia or as ‘Nitro-Chalk’ removed approximately 29 kg of N, 3 kg of P (7 kg P2O6), 26 kg of K (31 kg K2O) and 2 kg of Mg (3 kg MgO) per tonne of dry matter produced.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , December 1973 , pp. 465 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chalmers, G. R. & Kemp, D. C. (1962). A harvester for herbage plots. J. agric. Engng Res. 7, 64.Google Scholar
Cooke, G. W. (1964). Nitrogen fertilisers. Proc. Fertil. Soc. no. 80.Google Scholar
Cowling, D. W. (1968). Ammonia as a source of nitrogen for grass swards. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 23, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, J. K. R., Blakemore, M. & Flint, R. C. (1972). Experiments on the use of anhydrous ammonia for grass. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 78, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herriott, J. B. D., Tkibe, A. J., Crooks, P. & Edwards, A. (1970). Anhydrous liquified ammonia for grassland. In Proceedings of a Symposium on Anhydrous Ammonia, pp. 55–60. National College of Agricultural Engineering, Silsoe, Bedford.Google Scholar
Hodgson, D. R. & Draycott, A. P. (1968). Aqueous ammonia compared with other nitrogenous fertilizers as solids and solutions on grass. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 71, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, F. & Jarvis, G. F. (1953). Ammonia gas as a fertilizer. Agriculture, Lond. 60, 275–7.Google Scholar
Jameson, H. R. (1959). Liquid nitrogenous fertilizers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 53, 33–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, D. & Castle, M. E. (1970). A comparison of the effects of anhydrous ammonia and a solid ammonium nitrate fertilizer on herbage production from a pure perennial ryegrass sward. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 75, 523–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitear, J. D. (1970). Levington experiments on anhydrous ammonia for grass and arable crops. In Proceedings of Symposium on Anhydrous Ammonia, pp. 39–54. National College of Agricultural Engineering, Silsoe, Bedford.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V. (1968). Why starve grass? Dairy Farmer, 02 1968.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V. & Penny, A. (1970). Anhydrous ammonia – yields and recoveries by spring wheat. In Proceedings of a Symposium on Anhydrous Ammonia, pp. 61–6. National College of Agricultural Engineering, Silsoe, Bedford.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A. & Flint, R. C. (1972 a). Results from an experiment comparing aqueous ammonia and ‘Nitro-Chalk’ for grazed grass. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 79, 341–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A. & Flint, R. C. (1972 b). Results from barley experiments comparing aqueous ammonia and aqueous urea with ammonium nitrate, and also liquid with granular NPK fertilizers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 79, 349–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. J. B. & Cooke, G. W. (1972). Experiments on herbage crops at Saxmundham, 1967–1971. Rep. Roihamsted exp. Stn for 1971, part 2, pp. 95–121.Google Scholar
Williams, R. J. B. (1971). The chemical composition of water from land drains at Saxmundham and Woburn, and the influence of rainfall upon nutrient losses. Rep. Rothamsted exp. Stn for 1970, part 2, pp. 36–67.Google Scholar