Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:13:05.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses of Yield, Components of Yield and Nutrient Content of Maize to Soil-Applied Zinc in Tropical Rainforest and Savannah Regions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. O. Kayode
G. O. Kayode
Affiliation:
National Cereals Research Institute, Moor Plantation, P. M. B. 5042, Ibadan, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Results of a 2-year studyin the rainforest and savannah zones of Nigeria todetermine the responses of yield, components of yield and nutrient content of maize to soilapplied zinc showed that Zn significantly increased yield in the new and old savannah soils, whereas significant yield response was recorded only in an old field of the forest zone. Ear weight was the only yield component significantly influenced by Zn treatments in the two zones. Application of 2·5 kg Zn/ha appears adequate for successful maize production in the savannah and old forest zones in the tropics.

Soil-applied Zn significantly increased ear-leaf N and Zn, but P concentration was significantly decreased. Grain yield was positively correlated with ear-leaf Zn.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 105 , Issue 1 , August 1985 , pp. 135 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alloway, B. J. (1976). Field studies on the magnesium, copper and zinc nutrition of maize. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baenette, B. M. & Warner, J. D. (1935).A response of chlorotic corn plants to the application of zinc sulfate to the soil. Soil Science 39, 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boawn, L. C., Viets, F. G. & Crawford, C. L. (1954). Effect of phosphate fertilizers on zinc nutrition of field beans. Soil Science 78, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, R. H. & Kurtz, L. T. (1945). Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science 59, 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, H. G. (1972). Trends in the use of micronutrients. In Micronutrients in Agriculture (ed. Mortvedt, J. L., Giordano, P. M. and Lindsay, W. L.), pp. 419–430. Madison, Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Fuehring, H. D. & Soofi, G. S. (1964). Nutrition of corn on a calcareous soil. II. Effect of zinc on the yields of grain and stover in relation to other micronutrients. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 28, 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1962). Soil Chemical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kanwar, J. S. & Randhawa, N. S. (1967). MicronutrientResearch in Soil and Plants in India. A Review. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Kayode, G. O. & Agboola, A. A. (1981). Effect of different nitrogen levels, plant population and soil nutrient status on yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.) in different ecological zones of Nigeria. Fertilizer Research 2, 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayode, G. O. & Agboola, A. A. (1983). Investigation on the use of macro and micro-nutrients to improve maize yields in south western Nigeria. Fertilizer Research 4, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinkenberg, K. & Higgins, G. M. (1968). An outline of northern Nigerian soils. Nigerian Journal of Science 2, 91–115.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. & Knezek, B. D. (1972). Climate and soil conditions promoting micronutrient deficiencies in plants. In Micronutrients in Agriculture (ed. Mortvedt, J. L., Giordano, P. M. and Lindsay, W. L.), ch. 12. Madison, Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Osiname, O. A., Schulte, E. E. & Corey, R. B. (1973). Soil tests for available copper and zinc in soils of western Nigeria. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 24, 1341–1349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Safaya, N. M. & Gupta, A. P. (1979). Differential susceptibility of corn cultivars to zinc deficiency. Agronomy Journal 71, 132–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safaya, N. M. & Singh, B. (1977). Differential susceptibility of two varieties of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) to phosphorus-induced zinc deficiency. Plant and Soil 48, 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, U. C. & Raj, H. (1976). Zinc response in corn as influenced by genetic variability. Agronomy Journal 68, 20–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, U. C. & Raj, H. (1980). Zinc response in pigeon pea as influenced by genotypic variability. Plant and Soil 57, 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takkar, P. N. & Randhawa, N. S. (1978). Micronutrients in Indian agriculture. Fertilizer News 23, 3–26.Google Scholar
Tiwari, K. N., Pathak, A. N. & Upadhyay, G. P. (1982). Effect of sedimentary pyrites and Zn application on yield, Zn and Ca nutrition of rice and wheat crops and on amelioration of saline sodic soil. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 411–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Survey Staff (1975). Soil classification. A comprehensive system (7th Approximation), 265 pp. United States Department of Agriculture. Washington D. C.Google Scholar
Walkley, A. & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar