Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:31:16.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of winter-sown maize cultivars to sowing time and row direction in north-west India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. S. Narwal ,
S. Poonia ,
G. Singh  and
D. S. Malik
S. S. Narwal
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, India
S. Poonia
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, India
G. Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, India
D. S. Malik
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In a 3-year study, maize (Zea mays L.) sown on 11 November or 1 December produced longer ears, higher grain yield per plant and greater grain yield per hectare than maize sown on 21 October. However, 100-kernel weight was greater when the crop was sown on 21 October and 11 November than on 1 December. There were no differences in yield characters or grain yield between cultivars or between row orientation. The sowing dates, maize cultivars and row direction had no influence on the number of ears per plant.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 106 , Issue 1 , February 1986 , pp. 169 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alberda, Th. (1969). The effect of low temperature on dry matter production, chlorophyll concentration and photosynthesis of maize plants at different ages. Ada Botanica Neerlandica 18, 39–49.Google Scholar
All India Coordinated Maize Improvement Project (1981). Response of maize varieties to date of planting and plant population at Varanasi. Annual Report, (1980–1981), pp. A1–4.Google Scholar
Allison, J. C. S. & Watson, D. J. (1966). The production and distribution of dry matter in maize after flowering. Annals of Botany (New series) 30, 365–381.Google Scholar
Ho, W. (1944). Soil inhabiting fungi attacking the roots of maize. Iowa Research Bulletin, No. 332.Google Scholar
Ho, W. & Melhus, I. E. (1940). Succession of soil inhabiting fungi attacking roots of maize. Phytologist 30, 10.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. B., Tollenaar, M. & Breuer, C. M. (1977). Effect of photoperiod and temperature on vegetative and reproductive growth of a maize (Zea mays L.) hybrid. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 57, 1127–1133.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis. New Jersey, U.S.A.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lee, C. H. (1978). Genetics of photoperiod sensitivity seasonal effects in corn. Ph.D. thesis, University of Hawaii (cited in Agricultural Meteorology 24, 253–262).Google Scholar
Mcwillian, J. R. & Naylor, A. W. (1967). Temperature and plant adaptation. I. Interaction of temperature and light in the synthesis of chlorophyll in corn. Plant Physiology 42, 1711–1715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. W., Watanabe, E. S. & Dean, L. A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soil, extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Circular No. 959. Washington, D.C.: U.S.D.A.Google Scholar
Scarsbkook, C. E. & Doss, B. D. (1973). Leaf area index and radiation as related to corn yield. Agronomy Journal 65, 459–461.Google Scholar
Sharma, A. K. (1984). Microclimatic modification for winter maize. M.Sc. thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.Google Scholar
Struik, P. C. & Deinum, B. (1982). Effect of light intensity after flowering on the productivity and quality of maize. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 30, 297–316.Google Scholar
Walkley, A. & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warrington, I. J. & Kanemasu, E. T. (1983). Corn growth response to temperature and photopheriod. I. Seedling emergence, tassel initiation and anthesis. Agronomy Journal 75, 749–754.Google Scholar
Wilkes, H. G. (1979). Mexico and Central America as a centre for the origin of agricultural and the evolution of maize. Crop Improvement 6, 1–18.Google Scholar