Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:03:25.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of semi-dwarf and conventional winter wheat varieties to the application of nitrogen fertilizer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. A. Blackman ,
J. Bingham  and
J. L. Davidson
J. A. Blackman
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Maris Lane, Trumpington, Cambridge CB2 2LQ
J. Bingham
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Maris Lane, Trumpington, Cambridge CB2 2LQ
J. L. Davidson
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Maris Lane, Trumpington, Cambridge CB2 2LQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Winter wheat varieties of contrasting height were grown in a series of yield trials to investigate their response to nitrogen fertilizer. The treatments also included application of fungicides and the use of nets to prevent lodging. The varieties were ‘semidwarfs’ based on the Norin 10 genetic factor Rht2 or taller ‘conventional’ varieties, all well adapted to the U.K. environment. The average response of the semi-dwarf varieties was similar to the conventional and there were varietal differences within each group. There was a marked tendency for the newer varieties to be more responsive but the varietal differences were not consistent between trials, the occurrence of powdery mildew (Erysiphe graminis) being a major factor. When this disease was prevalent, response to nitrogen was greatest in resistant varieties and increased by application of fungicides. In farm practice the optimum rate of nitrogen application for a variety will depend on its physiological response, resistance to lodging and resistance to diseases if these are not controlled by fungicides. No evidence was obtained that the gene Rht2 necessarily confers a greater response to nitrogen.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 90 , Issue 3 , June 1978 , pp. 543 - 550
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, R. E. (1970). Differentiating between two Norin 10-Brevor 14 semi-dwarf genes in a common genetic background. Seiken Ziho 22, 83–90.Google Scholar
Bingham, J. (1972). Physiological objectives in breeding for grain yield in wheat. Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of Eucarpia, Cambridge, 1971, 15–29.Google Scholar
Bockmann, H. (1968). Phytopathological aspects of chlorocholinechloride application. Euphytica Supplement No. 1, 271–4.Google Scholar
Borojevic, S. (1968). Characteristics of some new dwarf and semi-dwarf lines. Euphytica Supplement No. 1, 143–51.Google Scholar
Briggle, L. W. & Vogel, O. A. (1968). Breeding short statured disease resistant wheats in the United States. Euphytica Supplement. No. 1, 107–30.Google Scholar
Cavazza, L. (1974). Response of wheat varieties to fertilisers – Italy. Proceedings of the Fourth FAO/Rockefeller Foundation Wheat Seminar, Tehran 1973, 344–9.Google Scholar
Fiddian, W. E. H. (1970). Cereal variety and nitrogen fertiliser relationships. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 12, 57–64.Google Scholar
Finlay, K. W. & Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). The analyses of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 742–54.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1976). Future role of physiology in wheat breeding. Proceedings of the Second International Winter Wheat Conference, Zagreb, 1975, 178–96.Google Scholar
Gale, M. D., Law, C. N. & Worland, A. J. (1975) The chromosomal location of a major dwarfing gene from Norin 10 in new British semi-dwarf wheats. Heredity 35 (3), 417–21.Google Scholar
Gale, M. D. & Law, C. N. (1977). Norin 10 based semi-dwarfism. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Genetic Diversity in Plants, Lahore, Pakistan 1976, 133–51.Google Scholar
Gale, M. D. & Marshall, G. A. (1976). The chromosomal location of Gai1 and Rhtl genes for gibberellin insensitivity and semi-dwarfism, in a derivative of Norin 10 wheat. Heredity 37 (2), 283–9.Google Scholar
Humphries, E. C. & Bond, W. (1969). Experiments with CCC on wheat: effect of spacing, nitrogen and irrigation. Annals of Applied Biology 64, 375–84.Google Scholar
Jain, N. K. & Singh, K. (1971). Performance of dwarf wheat varieties at increasing levels of fertility. Indian Journal of Agronomy 16 (2), 176–7.Google Scholar
Lupton, F. G. H. (1976). The potential of semi-dwarf winter wheats. Proceedings of the Second International Winter Wheat Conference, Zagreb, 1975, 60–4.Google Scholar
Lupton, F. G. H., Oliver, R. H. & Ruckenbauer, P. (1974). An analysis of the factors determining yields in crosses between semi-dwarf and taller wheat varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 483–96.Google Scholar
McNeal, F. H., Berg, M. A., Stewart, V. R., & Baldridge, D. E. (1972). Agronomic response of three height classes of spring wheat, Triticum aestivum L., compared at different yield levels. Agronomy Journal 64, 362–4.Google Scholar
National Institute of Agricultural Botany (1971). Wheat, barley and oat varieties completing trials in 1971. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 12 (2), 358–84.Google Scholar
National Institute of Agricultural Botany (1976). Recommended varieties of cereals. Farmers' Leaflet No. 8.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. N. & Blacklock, J. C. (1971). Effects of plant density and nitrogen fertilizer on growth and yield of short varieties of wheat derived from Norin 10. Annals of Applied Biology 68, 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitear, J. D. (1976). Nitrogen requirements of winter wheat and spring barley varieties. Fisons Agricultural Technical Information, Autumn 1976.Google Scholar