Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:13:07.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The response of dairy cows grazing a nitrogen fertilized grass pasture to a supplement of protected casein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. H. Stobbs ,
D. J. Minson  and
M. N. McLeod
T. H. Stobbs
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O. Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, St Lucia, Queensland, 4067 Australia
D. J. Minson
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O. Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, St Lucia, Queensland, 4067 Australia
M. N. McLeod
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O. Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, St Lucia, Queensland, 4067 Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Twenty-one Jersey cows in their 6th–8th week of lactation grazed Chloris gayana pastures fertilized with nitrogen and were treated in three ways, no casein (control), casein (1 kg/cow/day) or formal-casein (1 kg/cow/day) in seven 3 x 3 Latin squares to measure the effect of protein protection on milk yield and milk composition. Additional animals fitted with oesophageal and rumen fistulae were used to determine composition of the diet selected and rumen characteristics on three treatments.

Cows ingested herbage containing 20% crude protein with a protein solubility of 40%. The untreated casein supplement increased milk yield by 3%, fat 5% and protein 2·4%. Formal-casein produced 20% (3·3 kg/day) more milk than the control, a 13% higher yield of butterfat and 27% more protein. Rumen ammonia concentrations in the afternoon were similar for the control and formal-casein supplemented cows (21 and 23mg/100ml) but significantly higher when casein was fed (74 mg/100 ml) indicating extensive deamination of the untreated protein.

Yields of C4–C16 fatty acids in milk fat were 8 and 21% higher for the casein and formal-casein treatments than for the controls, which together with the higher live weight of formal-casein supplemented cows indicated that the milk yield response to the protein supplements was mainly due to a higher daily intake of herbage.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 89 , Issue 1 , August 1977 , pp. 137 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A.O.A.C. (1965). Official Methods of Analysis, 10th edition. Washington, D.C.: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Clark, J. H. (1975). Lactational responses to postruminal administration of proteins and amino acids. Journal Dairy Science 58, 1178–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochrane, G. C. (1975). A review of the analysis of 151–9. free fatty acids (C2–C6,). Journal of Chromatography Science 13, 440–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrig, R. G., Clark, J. H. & Davis, C. L. (1974). Effect of abomasal infusion of sodium caseinate on milk yield, nitrogen utilization and amino acid nutrition of the dairy cow. Journal of Nutrition 104, 151–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egan, A. B. & Moir, R. J. (1965). Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. 1. Effects of duodenally infused single doses of casein, urea and propionate upon voluntary intake of a low-protein roughage by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16, 437–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1974). Effects of formaldehyde treatment of casein and peanut meal supplements on amino acids in digesta and plasma of lambs and sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 25, 583–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, K. A., Hemsley, J. A. & Ries, P. J. (1967). Nutrition and wool growth. The effect of protecting dietary protein from microbial degradation in the rumen. Australian Journal of Science 30, 215–17.Google Scholar
Hale, G. D., Jacobson, D. R. & Hemken, R. E. (1972). Continuous abomasal infusion of casein in lactating Holsteins fed urea supplemented diets. Journal of Dairy Science 55, 689 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. I., Lambourne, L. J., Roe, R. & Minson, D. J. (1970). Quality of tropical grasses for milk production. Proceedings XIth International Grassland Congress, Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia, 1970, 860–4.Google Scholar
Hardison, W. A. (1966). Chemical composition, nutrient content and potential milk production capacity of fresh tropical herbage. Dairy Training and Research Institute, Philippines Research Bulletin, no. 1.Google Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1966). The Rumen and Its Microbes. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, H. (1970). The length of change-over periods in change-over designs with cattle. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 10, 691–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logsdon, E. E. (1960). A method for the determination of ammonia in biological materials on the auto-analyser. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 87, 801–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MoDonald, I. W. (1968). Nutritional aspects of protein metabolism in ruminants. Australian Veterinary Journal 44, 145–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machlin, L. J. (1973). Effect of growth hormone on milk production and feed utilization in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 56, 575–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minson, D. J. & McLeod, M. N. (1972). The in vitro technique: its modification for estimating digestibility of large numbers of tropical pasture samples. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Division of Tropical Pastures, Technical Paper no. 8.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. J. & Leng, R. A. (1972). Dynamic aspects of ammonia and urea metabolism in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 27, 117–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phipps, R. H. (1973). Supplementary feeding of dairy cows in early lactation. Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad 50, 329–32.Google Scholar
Phipps, R. H. & Holmes, W. (1975). Supplementary feeding of grazing dairy cows in Uganda. Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad 52, 59–64.Google Scholar
Reis, P. J. & Tunks, D. A. (1969). Evaluation of formaldehyde-treated casein for wool growth and nitrogen retention. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 20, 775–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. & Line, C. (1961). The effect of the phase of energy nutrition of the cow on the secretion in milk of the constituents of the solids-not-fat fraction and on the concentrations of certain blood plasma constituents. Journal of the British Nutrition Society 15, 109–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal, A. J. E. & Jeffrey, H. (1972). Energy and protein supplements for dairy cows grazing tropical pasture. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 9, 292–6.Google Scholar
Spires, H. R., Clark, J. H. & Derrig, R. G. (1973). Postruminal administration of sodium caseinate in lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 56, 664 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Stobbs, T. H. (1971). Production and composition of milk from cows grazing Siratro (Phaseolus atropurpureus) and greenleaf Desmodium (Desmodium introtum). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 11, 268–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stobbs, T. H. & Brett, D. J. (1974). Milk yields and the composition of milk and blood as indicators of energy intake by Jersey cows. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 25, 657–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storry, J. E. (1970). Ruminant metabolism in relation to the synthesis and secretion of milk fat. Journal of Dairy Research 37, 139–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. W. (1971). Protein requirements of milking cows. Journal of Dairy Science 54, 1629–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vik-Mo, L., Emery, R. A. & Huber, J. T. (1974). Milk protein production in cows abomasally infused with casein or glucose. Journal of Dairy Science 57, 869–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weston, R. H. (1973). Factors limiting the intake of feed by sheep. VII. The digestion of a medium quality roughage and the effect of post-ruminal infusion of casein on its consumption by young sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 387–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlt, J. E., Sniffen, C. J. & Hoover, W. H. (1973). Measurement of protein solubility in common feedstuffs. Journal of Dairy Science 56, 1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar