Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:57:46.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relay intercropping and mineral fertilizer effects on biomass production, maize productivity and weed dynamics in contrasting soils under conservation agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2016

B. MHLANGA ,
S. CHEESMAN ,
B. MAASDORP ,
W. MUPANGWA  and
C. THIERFELDER
B. MHLANGA*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zimbabwe, P. O. Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, Zimbabwe, P. O. Box MP 163, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
S. CHEESMAN
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, Zimbabwe, P. O. Box MP 163, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
B. MAASDORP
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zimbabwe, P. O. Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
W. MUPANGWA
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, Zimbabwe, P. O. Box MP 163, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
C. THIERFELDER
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, Zimbabwe, P. O. Box MP 163, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Cash-constrained farmers who cannot afford herbicides and mineral fertilizers may incorporate green manure cover crops (GMCCs) as relay crops to aid in management of weeds and nitrogen in maize systems under conservation agriculture in cases where rotations are a challenge. An experiment was conducted at two sites with contrasting soil types, University of Zimbabwe farm (clay) and Domboshawa Training Centre (sandy) to investigate the effects of maize/velvet bean intercropping at 8 weeks after planting maize (WAPM), applying different fertilizer rates and exploring their interactive effects on weed composition, maize productivity and biomass production [total maize non-cob biomass (stover) plus GMCC biomass]. The performance of the system depended largely on the amount of rainfall received within and across the seasons, sites and their interaction; also on the amount of fertilizer applied. Generally, biomass yields attained by velvet bean [Mucuna pruriens L. (DC.)] were lower than reported previously. Maize grain yield and weed diversity were higher in treatments with higher fertilizer rates, reaching up to 5·1 t/ha and 1·39, respectively. Generally, the highest weed diversity and highest maize grain yield values were observed in maize/velvet bean combinations and higher fertilizer rates (i.e. 0·27 and 4·8 t/ha, respectively) in the sandy soil. Higher fertilizer rates resulted in greater maize stover yield and this contributed greatly to the biomass productivity of the system in the sandy soil in the 2012/13 season, while the high biomass productivity observed in velvet bean in the clay site in the final season contributed significantly to productivity. Maize productivity was not affected by velvet bean introduced at 8 WAPM in any of the seasons. The present study showed that relay cropping velvet bean as late as 8 WAPM and onwards has potential to increase biomass production without compromising maize yields. However, planting it as late as 8 WAPM results in reduced productivity due to reduced moisture availability.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 155 , Issue 6 , August 2017 , pp. 876 - 887
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baudron, F., Andersson, J. A., Corbeels, M. & Giller, K. E. (2001). Failing to yield? Ploughs, conservation agriculture and the problem of agricultural intensification: an example from the Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe. Journal of Development Studies 48, 393–412.Google Scholar
Beuerlein, J. (2001). Relay Cropping Wheat and Soybeans. Extension factsheet AGF-106-01. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Boddey, R. M., Alves, B. J. R. & Urquiaga, S. (2006). Leguminous biological nitrogen fixation in sustainable tropical agroecosystems. In Biological Approaches to Sustainable Soil Systems (Eds Uphoff, N., Ball, A. S., Fernandes, E., Herren, H., Husson, O., Laing, M., Palm, C., Pretty, J., Sanchez, P., Sanginga, N. & Thies, J.), pp. 401–408. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheesman, S., Andersson, J. A. & Frossard, E. (2016). Does closing knowledge gaps close yield gaps? On-farm conservation agriculture trials and adoption dynamics in three smallholder farming areas in Zimbabwe. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 155, 81–100. doi: 10.1017/S0021859616000095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisk, J. W., Hesterman, O. B., Shrestha, A., Kells, J. J., Harwood, R. R., Squire, J. M. & Sheaffer, C. C. (2001). Weed suppression by annual legume cover crops in no-tillage corn. Agronomy Journal 93, 319–325.Google Scholar
Giller, K. E., Tittonell, P., Rufino, M. C., Van Wijk, M. T., Zingore, S., Mapfumo, P., Adjei-Nsiah, S., Herrero, M., Chikowo, R., Corbeels, M., Rowe, E. C., Baijukya, F., Mwijage, A., Smith, J., Yeboah, E., Van Der Burg, W. J., Sanogo, O. M., Misiko, M., De Ridder, N., Karanja, S., Kaizzi, C., K'ungu, J., Mwale, M., Nwaga, D., Pacini, C. & Vanlauwe, B. (2011). Communicating complexity: integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development. Agricultural Systems 104, 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M. & Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812–818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heuzé, V., Tran, G. & Baumont, R. (2013). Common vetch (Vicia sativa). Feedipedia, a programme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. Paris & Rome: INRA, CIRAD, AFZ & FAO. Available from: http://www.feedipedia.org/node/239 (verified 20 September 2016).Google Scholar
IIRR & ACT (2006). Crops and cropping systems. In Conservation Agriculture: A Manual for Farmers and Extension Workers in Africa (Ed. Wagner, B.), pp. 104–115. Nairobi & Harare: International Institute of Rural Reconstruction & African Conservation Tillage Network. Available online from http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/AfricaTrainingManual.html (verified 20 September 2016).Google Scholar
Kaizzi, C. K., Ssali, H. & Vlek, P. L. G. (2004). The potential of Velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens) and N fertilizers in maize production on contrasting soils and agro-ecological zones of East Uganda. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 68, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamanga, B. C. G., Shamudzarira, Z. & Vaughan, C. (2003). On-Farm Legume Experimentation to Improve Soil Fertility in the Zimuto Communal Area, Zimbabwe: Farmer Perceptions and Feedback. Risk Management Project Working Paper Series 03–02. Harare, Zimbabwe: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Kassie, G. T., Erenstein, O., Mwangi, W. M., La Rovere, R., Setimela, P. & Langyintuo, A. (2012). Characterization of Maize Production in Southern Africa: Synthesis of CIMMYT/ DTMA Household Level Farming System Surveys in Angola, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Socioeconomics Working Paper 4. Mexico, DF, Mexico: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Lesoing, G., Moomaw, R. & Francis, C. (1991). Two Crops in One Year: Relay Intercropping. Historical Materials from University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension. Paper 722. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Google Scholar
Liebman, M. & Dyck, E. (1993). Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management. Ecological Applications 3, 92–122.Google Scholar
Lithourgidis, A. S., Dordas, C. A., Damalas, C. A. & Vlachostergios, D. N. (2011). Annual intercrops: an alternative pathway for sustainable agriculture. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5, 396–410.Google Scholar
Lu, Y., Watkins, K. B., Teasdale, J. R. & Abdul-Baki, A. A. (2000). Cover crops in sustainable food production. Food Reviews International 16, 121–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maasdorp, B. & Titterton, M. (1997). Nutritional improvement of maize silage for Dairying: mixed crop silages from sole and intercropped legumes and a long season variety of maize. 1. Biomass yield and nutritive value. Animal Feed Science and Technology 69, 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Kent, UK: Croom Helm Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mapfumo, P., Mtambanengwe, F. & Vanlauwe, B. (2007). Organic matter quality and management effects on enrichment of soil organic matter fractions in contrasting soils of Zimbabwe. Plant Soil 296, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mhlanga, B., Cheesman, S., Maasdorp, B., Mupangwa, W. & Thierfelder, C. (2015). Contribution of cover crops to the productivity of maize-based conservation agriculture systems in Zimbabwe. Crop Science 55, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mhlanga, B., Cheesman, S., Maasdorp, B., Mupangwa, W., Munyoro, C., Sithole, C. & Thierfelder, C. (2016). Effects of relay cover crop planting date on their biomass and maize productivity in a sub-humid region of Zimbabwe under conservation agriculture. Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 78, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, K. A. & Callahan, J. E. (2006). Beachcomber biology: the Shannon-Weiner species diversity index. In Tested Studies for Laboratory Teaching, Vol. 27. Proceedings of the 27th Workshop/Conference of the Association for Biology Laboratory Education (ABLE) (Ed. O'Donnell, M. A.), pp. 334–338. Blacksburg, VA: Association for Biology Laboratory Education (ABLE).Google Scholar
Nyamapfene, K. W. (1991). The Soils of Zimbabwe. Harare, Zimbabwe: Nehanda Publishers (Pvt) Ltd.Google Scholar
Olorunmaiye, P. M. (2010). Weed control potential of five legume cover crops in maize/cassava intercrop in a Southern Guinea savanna ecosystem of Nigeria. Australian Journal of Crop Science 4, 324–329.Google Scholar
Peachey, E., Luna, J., Dick, R. & Sattell, R. (1999). Cover Crop Weed Suppression in Annual Rotations. EM8725. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Extension Service.Google Scholar
Ratnadass, A., Fernandes, P., Avelino, J. & Habib, R. (2012). Plant species diversity for sustainable management of crop pests and diseases in agroecosystems: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32, 273–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusinamhodzi, L., Corbeels, M., Nyamangara, J. & Giller, K. E. (2012). Maize-grain legume intercropping is an attractive option for ecological intensification that reduces climatic risk for smallholder farmers in central Mozambique. Field Crops Research 136, 12–22.Google Scholar
Sommer, R., Bossio, D., Desta, L., Dimes, J., Kihara, J., Koala, S., Mango, N., Rodriguez, D., Thierfelder, C. & Winowiecki, L. (2013). Profitable and Sustainable Nutrient Management Systems for East and Southern African Smallholder Farming Systems–Challenges and Opportunities. Cali, Colombia: CIAT, The University of Queensland, QAAFI & CIMMYT.Google Scholar
STATISTIX (2008). Statistix: Analytical Software. Tallahassee, FL: Analytical Software.Google Scholar
Stevenson, F. C., Legere, A., Simard, R. R., Angers, D. A., Pageau, D. & Lafond, J. (1997). Weed species diversity in spring barley varies with crop rotation and tillage, but not with nutrient source. Weed Science 45, 798–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. (2012). Database File for Velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens). Milam County, TX: Raintree. Available from: http://www.rain-tree.com/velvetbean.htm#.UzFY4oXQEUM (verified 20 September 2016).Google Scholar
Thierfelder, C., Cheesman, S. & Rusinamhodzi, L. (2013). Benefits and challenges of crop rotations in maize-based conservation agriculture (CA) cropping systems of Southern Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 11, 108–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, V., Thomas, R. G. & Staples, R. E. (1960). An Agricultural Survey of Southern Rhodesia. Part I. The Agroecological Survey. Salisbury, Rhodesia: The Government Printer.Google Scholar
Vogel, H. (1994). Weeds in single-crop conservation farming in Zimbabwe. Soil and Tillage Research 31, 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VSN International (2002). GenStat for Windows, 12th edn. Hemel Hempstead, UK: VSN International.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. (1965). Dominance and diversity in land plant communities: numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution. Science 147, 250–260.Google Scholar