Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:19:07.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships between certain carcass measurements, weights of wholesale joints and sample joint composition of Hereford cross-bred steers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. C. Tayler ,
J. E. Rudman  and
C. D. Kemp
J. C. Tayler
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Berkshire
J. E. Rudman
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Berkshire
C. D. Kemp
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Berkshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. In a population of Hereford crossbred steers carcass conformation was measured by weighing wholesale joints cut in London and Home Counties fashion and dissecting a single rib sample joint. Correlations were calculated between weight of joints and certain linear carcass measurements.

2. Weights of individual joints in a group of good cuts were studied in relation to carcass composition estimated from sample joint dissection. Carcass fatness at constant carcass weight was correlated positively with some joints and negatively with others. A thigh width measurement was related to the weight of these joints in a similar fashion. This accounted for the low value of thigh width as an index of the proportion of good cuts.

3. The weights of joints, and many of the measurements, were highly correlated with carcass weight. When carcass weight was allowed for, partial correlations were too low to support the use of linear measurements to predict weight of joints in individual carcasses.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , November 1961 , pp. 347 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bodwell, C. E., Harrington, G., Pomeroy, R. W. & Williams, S. D. R. (1959). Beef carcass measurements in relation to the yields of wholesale and retail cuts: preliminary results. Fifth Meeting of European Meat Research Workers, Paris.Google Scholar
Gerrard, F. (1951). Meat Technology, 2nd ed.London: Leonard Hill.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Harrington, G. & Pomeroy, R. W. (1959). The yields of wholesale cuts from carcasses of Aberdeen-Angus crosses fattened on grass and in yards. J. Agric. Sci. 53, 64–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, A. H. & Barton, R. A. (1958). Live-weight loss and its components in Romney ewes subjected to L-thyroxine therapy and a low plane of nutrition. I. Effects on live weight, carcass weight and carcass composition. J. Agric. Sci. 51, 265–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneebone, H., Marks, T., McMeekan, C. P. & Walker, D. E. (1950). Evaluation of the chiller beef carcass. N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A, 31 (part 5), 3–14.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. (1958). Carcass quality studies in cattle: the measurement of conformation. Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. 1958, p. 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. (1952). The quantitative definition of cattle carcasses. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 3, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar