Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:10:47.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recovery of 15N-labelled fertilizer applied in autumn to winter wheat at four sites in eastern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. S. Powlson
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., ALB 2JQ
P. B. S. Hart
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., ALB 2JQ
G. Pruden
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., ALB 2JQ
D. S. Jenkinson
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., ALB 2JQ

Summary

The recovery of autumn-applied labelled fertilizer N in winter wheat and in the soil and roots was measured in five experiments on three soil types in eastern England. In four of the experiments, crop recoveries of fertilizer N ranged from 11 to 34 % in years when drainage during winter and early spring was close to, or less than, the long-term average of about 200 mm. Crop recovery was higher (42 %) at a site where the soil was heavier and winter drainage was less. Total recoveries (in crop and soil, 0–50 cm) ranged from 22 to 61 %. Fertilizer N was at least risk to leaching when there was a large soil moisture deficit at the time of application. There was a linear relationship between fertilizer N lost and drainage (but not rainfall) between the time of N application and the end of March of the following year. Autumn-applied fertilizer N increased grain yield slightly in two of the experiments and decreased it in a third.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Addiscott, T. M. (1977). A simple computer model for leaching in structured soils. Journal of Soil Science 28, 654–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullen, E. R. & Lessells, W. J. (1957). The effect of nitrogen on cereal yields. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 49, 319328.Google Scholar
Catt, J. A., Weir, A. H., Nourish, R. E., Rayner, J. H., King, D. W., Hall, D. G. M. & Murphy, C. P. (1980). The soils of Woburn Experimental Farm. III. Stackyard. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1979, Part 2, pp. 539.Google Scholar
Cooke, G. W. & Williams, R. J. B. (1972). Problems with cultivations and soil structure at Saxmundham. Rotkamsted Experimental Station Report for 1971, Part 2, pp. 122142.Google Scholar
Hall, D. G. M., Reeve, M. J., Thomasson, A. J. & Wright, V. F. (1977). Water retention, porosity and density of field soils. Soil Survey Technical Monograph No. 9, 74 pp. Harpenden: Rothamsted Experimental Station.Google Scholar
Hodge, C. A. H. (1972). The soils at Saxmundham Experimental Station. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1971, Part 2, pp. 143148.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. E. (1975). Experiments made on Stackyard Field, Woburn, 1876–1974. I. History of the fields, details of the cropping and manuring and the yields in continuous wheat and barley experiments. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1974, Part 2, pp. 2944.Google Scholar
Leitch, M. H. (1980). Soil and fertilizer nitrogen use by winter wheat established in cultivated and undisturbed soil. Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading, England.Google Scholar
Powlson, D. S., Pruden, G., Johnston, A. E. & Jenkinson, D. S. (1986). The nitrogen cycle in the Broadbalk Wheat Experiment: recovery and losses of 15N-labelled fertilizer applied in spring and inputs of nitrogen from the atmosphere. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 591609.Google Scholar
Powlson, D. S., Jenkinson, D. S., Pruden, G. & Johnston, A. E. (1985). The effect of straw incorporation on the uptake of nitrogen by winter wheat. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 36, 2630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruden, G., Powlson, D. S. & Jenkinson, D. S. (1985). The measurement of 15N in soil and plant material. Fertilizer Research 6, 205218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Society (1983). The Nitrogen Cycle of the United Kingdom. Report of a Royal Society Study Group, Royal Society, London.Google Scholar
Smith, L. P. (1971). The significance of winter rainfall over farmland in England and Wales. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Technical Bulletin No. 24, 69 pp.Google Scholar
Thompson, N., Barrie, I. A. & Ayles, M. (1981). The Meteorological Office rainfall and evaporation calculation system. Hydrological Memorandum No. 45, 72 pp.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Darby, R. J. & Bird, E. (1982). Bothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1981, Part 1, pp. 250261.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V. & Penny, A. (1965). Experiments measuring the residual effects of nitrogen fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 65, 195200.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V. & Penny, A. (1975). Results from experiments measuring the effects of large amounts of an NPK fertilizer on yield, tuber size and N, P and K contents of three potato varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 515525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A., Darby, R. J. & Bird, E. (1984). The effect of sowing date and of leaching on soil nitrogen supply for winter wheat, at Rothamsted and Woburn, 1981. In The Nitrogen Requirements of Cereals, MAFF/ADAS Reference Book 385, pp. 125128.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A., Guttebidge, R. J., Darby, R. J. & Hewitt, M. V. (1985). Tests of amounts and times of application of nitrogen and of sequential sprays of aphicide and fungicides on winter wheat, following either beans or wheat, and the effects of take-all (Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici), on two varieties at Saxmundham, Suffolk 1980–3. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105, 97122.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A. & Williams, R. J. B. (1967). Experiment comparing the effects on yields of potatoes of three methods of applying three amounts of NPK fertilizer and the residual effects on following winter wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 69, 247253.Google Scholar