Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:58:38.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential nutritive value of a wide range of grassland species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Wilman  and
J. A. Riley
D. Wilman
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3DD, UK
J. A. Riley
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3DD, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Fifteen grassland species were grown in a heated glasshouse in February-April 1985. The harvested herbage was separated into leaf and ‘stem’ and analysed for neutral detergent fibre, digestibility, physical breakdown when macerated, fibrosity, water soluble carbohydrate and N, P, K, Ca, Mg and Na.

Lolium perenne was digestible, but rather high in neutral detergent fibre and not readily broken down by maceration. The other grasses tested, Holcus lanatus, Poa annua and Glyceria fluitans, tended to be less digestible and higher in neutral detergent fibre than L. perenne.

The leaves of all 11 dicotyledonous species were much lower in neutral detergent fibre than the leaves of the grasses, and most broke down readily when macerated. The stems of Medicago saliva and of two shrub species (Lonicera periclymenum and Prunus spinosa) were the highest in neutral detergent fibre.

Rumex obtusifolius, Spergula arvensis and Stellaria media were high in Mg; Plantago lanceolata, S. arvensis and S. media were high in Na; and S. arvensis was high in P.

Three perennial and two annual herbaceous, dicotyledonous non-legumes were selected as being of sufficient promise and interest to be compared with Lolium perenne in feeding experiments: Plantago lanceolata, Taraxacum officinale, Rumex obtusifolius, Spergula arvensis and Stellaria media.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 120 , Issue 1 , February 1993 , pp. 43 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Courtney, A. D. & Johnston, R. (1978). A consideration of the contribution to production of Rumex obtusifolius in a grazing regime. In Proceedings of the 1978 British Crop Protection Conference – Weeds (14th British Weed Control Conference) vol. 1, pp. 325–331. Brighton: British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Davies, W. (1960). The Grass Crop: Its Development, Use, and Maintenance. 2nd edn.London: E. & F. N. Spon Ltd.Google Scholar
Derrick, R. W., Moseley, G. & Wilman, D. (1993). Intake, by sheep, and digestibility of chickweed, dandelion, dock, ribwort and spurrey, compared with perennial ryegrass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edlin, H. L. (1951). British Plants and their Uses. London: B. T. Batsford Ltd.Google Scholar
Fairbairn, C. B. & Thomas, B. (1959). The potential nutritive value of some weeds common to north-eastern England. Journal of the British Grassland Society 14, 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faithfull, N. T. (1971). Automated simultaneous determination of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and calcium on the same herbage digest solution. Laboratory Practice 20, 41–44.Google Scholar
Faithfull, N. T. (1974). The analysis of magnesium in herbage Kjeldahl digests by atomic absorption spectrophotometry with the nitrous oxide/acetylene flame. Laboratory Practice 23, 177–178.Google Scholar
Fream, W. (1900). The Complete Grazier and Farmers' and Cattle-Breeders' Assistant Forming a Compendium of Husbandry (originally written by Youatt, W.), 14th edn.London: Crosby Lockwood & Son.Google Scholar
Haggar, R. J., Soper, D. & Cormack, W. F. (1990). Weed control in agricultural grassland. In Weed Control Handbook: Principles (Eds Hance, R. J. & Holly, K.) 8th edn, pp. 387–405. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Hides, D. H., Lovatt, J. A. & Hayward, M. V. (1983). Influence of stage of maturity on the nutritive value of Italian ryegrasses. Grass and Forage Science 38, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, C. E. (1984). Grasses: A Guide to their Structure, Identification, Uses, and Distribution in the British Isles. 3rd edn. revised by Hubbard, J. C. E.. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Ivins, J. D. (1952). The relative palatability of herbage plants. Journal of the British Grassland Society 7, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, W. A. (1974). Yorkshire Fog (Holcus lanatus). Its potential as a pasture species. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 35, 249–257.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1960). Rations for Livestock. Bulletin no. 48, 15th edn.London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Moseley, G. (1982). The role of physical breakdown in controlling the nutritive quality of forages. Report for 1981, Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwvth, pp. 167–182.Google Scholar
Moseley, G. & Dellow, D. W. (1985). Particle breakdown and chewing activity in sheep fed on fresh perennial ryegrass and white clover. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 44, 52A.Google Scholar
National Institute of Agricultural Botany (1989). Recommended Varieties of Grasses and Herbage Legumes 1989/90. Farmers Leaflet no. 4. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Payne, J. M. (1977). Metabolic Diseases in Farm Animals. London: W. Heinemann Medical Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Ramanathan, V. (1988). Factors affecting the nutritional quality of conserved forage species and varieties. PhD thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Sharman, B. C. (1947). The biology and developmental morphology of the shoot apex in the Gramineae. New Phytologist 46, 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, H. L., Blair, R. M. & Segelquist, C. A. (1974). Fiber composition and forage digestibility by small ruminants. Journal of Wildlife Management 38, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spedding, C. R. W. & Diekmahns, E. C. (Eds) (1972). Grasses and Legumes in British Agriculture. Bulletin no. 49, Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field Crops. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Thomas, T. A. (1977). An automated procedure for the determination of soluble carbohydrates in herbage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 639–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D. J. (Ed.) (1984). Forage Legumes. Occasional Symposium no. 16, British Grassland Society. Hurley: British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, E. J. (1981). The Mineral Nutrition of Livestock. 2nd edn.Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1982). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. Corvallis, Oregon: O & B Books Inc.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. & Wine, R. H. (1967). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 50, 50–55.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. R. (1985). An interdisciplinary approach for increasing yield and improving quality of forages. Proceedings of the XV International Grassland Congress, Kyoto, Japan, 1985, pp. 49–55.Google Scholar